Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2nd Duke party dancer now questions doubts about accuser
Daily Comet & AP ^ | April 21, 2006 | ALLEN G. BREED

Posted on 04/21/2006 12:56:01 AM PDT by OakOak

Edited on 04/21/2006 2:52:00 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

At first, a stripper who performed at a Duke University lacrosse team party doubted the story of a colleague who told police she was dragged into a bathroom and raped.

Now, Kim Roberts isn't so sure.

"I was not in the bathroom when it happened, so I can't say a rape occurred - and I never will," Roberts told The Associated Press Thursday in her first on-the-record interview. But after watching defense attorneys release photos of the accuser, and upset by the leaking of both dancers' criminal pasts, she said she has to "wonder about their character."

"In all honesty, I think they're guilty," she said. "And I can't say which ones are guilty ... but somebody did something besides underage drinking. That's my honest-to-God impression."

Attorneys for the 46 players have aggressively proclaimed the players' innocence, citing DNA tests during a public campaign that has included describing and releasing photos from the party.

Those photos, the defense maintains, show the accuser was both injured and impaired when she arrived, and also support the claim that one of the two players who has been indicted would not have had enough time to participate in any assault before he left the party. The district attorney has said he also hopes to charge a third suspect in the case.

The attorneys claim Roberts at first told a member of the defense team that she did not believe the accuser's allegations. They say she has changed her story to gain favorable treatment in a criminal case against her. They note she also e-mailed a New York public relations firm, asking in her letter for advice on "how to spin this to my advantage."

"We believe ... her story has been motivated by her own self-interest," said attorney Bill Thomas, who represents one of the uncharged players. "I think that a jury will ultimately have to decide the question of her credibility."

Roberts, 31, was arrested on March 22 - eight days after the party - on a probation violation from a 2001 conviction for embezzling $25,000 from a photofinishing company in Durham where she was a payroll specialist, according to documents obtained by the AP.

On Monday, the same day a grand jury indicted lacrosse players Reade Seligmann and Collin Finnerty, a judge agreed to a change so that Roberts would no longer have to pay a 15 percent fee to a bonding agent. District Attorney Mike Nifong signed a document saying he would not oppose the change.

"It seems she is receiving very favorable financial treatment for what she is now saying," Thomas said.

Mark Simeon, Roberts' attorney, said the bond conditions were changed because Roberts is not considered a flight risk. Nifong, who hasn't spoken with reporters about the case in weeks, didn't return a call seeking comment.

Roberts' testimony could be vital during any trial of the two sophomores, indicted on charges of first-degree rape, sexual offense and kidnapping.

Other than lacrosse players and the accuser, a 27-year-old student at a nearby university, Roberts is believed to be the only other person at the March 13 party.

Roberts said Thursday she does not remember Seligmann's face, but said she recalls seeing Finnerty - whom she described as the "little skinny one."

"I was looking him right in the eyes," she said.

Although she would not talk extensively about the party, she confirmed some of what the other dancer told police - including that the women initially left the party after one of the players threatened to sodomize the women with a broomstick.

The players' attorneys have said their clients were angry and demanded a refund when the women stopped dancing, but Roberts disputed that.

"They ripped themselves off when they started hollering about a broomstick," she said.

The accuser told police that the women were coaxed back into the house with an apology, at which point they were separated. That's when she said she was dragged into a bathroom and raped, beaten and choked for a half hour.

Later, police received a 911 call from a woman complaining that she had been called racial slurs by white men gathered outside the home where the party took place. The defense has said it believes the second dancer at the party made that call.

Roberts then drove the accuser - whom she reportedly had just met that night - to a grocery store and asked a security guard to call 911. The accuser was described later by a police officer as "just passed-out drunk."

The defense timeline is backed up by a cab driver who said Seligmann called for a ride at 12:14 a.m., and was picked up five minutes later. The defense argues that if the dancers were performing around midnight, Seligmann would not have had enough time to participate in the 30-minute assault described by the accuser.

The cabbie, Moez Mostafa, also said he saw a woman leaving the party in anger, and overheard someone say, "She just a stripper. She's going to call the police."

"She looked, like, mad," he said of the woman. "In her face, the way she walked, the way she talked, she looked like mad."

On Thursday, authorities released warrants detailing their search earlier this week of Finnerty's dorm room. Seized during the search were a newspaper article and an envelope addressed to Finnerty.

Also Thursday, 5W Public Relations, a New York firm that specializes in "crisis communication," distributed an e-mail signed "The 2nd Dancer," and Roberts confirmed she sent it after learning the AP knew her identity.

"I've found myself in the center of one of the biggest stories in the country," she wrote. "I'm worried about letting this opportunity pass me by without making the best of it and was wondering if you had any advice as to how to spin this to my advantage."

Ronn Torossian, 5W's president, said he replied, but got no response.

"If this person is indeed who they say they are, I would be happy to speak with her," said Torossian, whose firm has represented the likes of Sean "Diddy" Combs, Ice Cube and Lil' Kim.

Roberts, like the accuser a divorced single mother who is black, took umbrage at the notion that she should not try to make something out of her experience. She's worried that once her name and criminal record are public, no one will want to hire her.

"Why shouldn't I profit from it?" she asked. "I didn't ask to be in this position ... I would like to feed my daughter."

Roberts is bracing for an all-out attack, but said she's almost past caring.

"Don't forget that they called me a damn n####," she said. "She (the accuser) was passed out in the car. She doesn't know what she was called. I was called that. I can never forget that."


BLOCKBUSTER !! KIM's a GEM !!

Roberts, 31, was arrested on March 22 - eight days after the party - on a probation violation from a 2001 conviction for embezzling $25,000 from a photofinishing company in Durham where she was a payroll specialist, according to documents obtained by the AP.


TOPICS: Local News
KEYWORDS: da; dancer; duke; dukelax; durham; lacrosse; lax; rape
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 761-780781-800801-820 ... 1,601-1,619 next last
To: Howlin

coming up next


781 posted on 04/21/2006 12:18:33 PM PDT by abb (Because News Reporting is too important to be left to the Journalists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 778 | View Replies]

To: bonfire

Well, for goodness sakes, I hope everybody is okay now, or at the very least recovering. Good to see you.


782 posted on 04/21/2006 12:19:01 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 755 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Unfortunately, Mark Geragos agrees with us, too. :-)
-----

ugh...DAGGER!

He needs to ZIP IT!


783 posted on 04/21/2006 12:19:11 PM PDT by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 780 | View Replies]

To: Jay Gould
I don't think anyone who did not make the slur should be humiliated.

Why not? Can't white people "group think," too?

784 posted on 04/21/2006 12:20:50 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 760 | View Replies]

To: abb

Watching now.......

Of, FGS, Nappy gonna tell us there's a squealer in the Lacrosse team?

No.


785 posted on 04/21/2006 12:22:21 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 781 | View Replies]

To: pepperhead
That's right. A poor person, a minority, a female, a gay can get pro bono legal assistance faster than you can say Jack Robbins, than say, the average "non-racial/sexual-identity" classification of "person". All TAXPAYERS pay for these "free" legal services.

Second, it can cost NOTHING to anyone in these "classifications" to file a harassive suit, a false suit. No bother to them. But you, the accused, will have to find and pay for your own lawyers.

You'll be paying thousands even when that suit is thrown out of court.

786 posted on 04/21/2006 12:23:14 PM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 714 | View Replies]

To: sissyjane

wild ass theory about a cooperating witness who's a team member...


787 posted on 04/21/2006 12:23:18 PM PDT by abb (Because News Reporting is too important to be left to the Journalists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 766 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Stuck at work here.

Is this his THEORY, or he is citing sources???


788 posted on 04/21/2006 12:23:33 PM PDT by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 785 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

maybe it's the black player...


789 posted on 04/21/2006 12:23:35 PM PDT by Krodg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 785 | View Replies]

To: abb

No way.

Absolutely none.

When is the last time Nap has been right about anything?


790 posted on 04/21/2006 12:23:53 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 787 | View Replies]

To: Jay Gould
This has escalated beyond humiliation, doncha think?

I don't care what those boys called that girl. Name calling isn't anywhere near as horrible as being falsely accused of rape. And yes, this woman is falsely accusing these boys. I absolutely believe that.

791 posted on 04/21/2006 12:23:58 PM PDT by PleaseNoMore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 760 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

That's not enough.
Nap is reaching.


792 posted on 04/21/2006 12:24:02 PM PDT by onyx (It's easier to indict a ham sandwich or Tom DeLay than it is to indict a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 785 | View Replies]

To: snarkytart

complete WAG


793 posted on 04/21/2006 12:24:02 PM PDT by abb (Because News Reporting is too important to be left to the Journalists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 788 | View Replies]

To: abb

Judge says DA must have a teammate who will testify against the defendants.


794 posted on 04/21/2006 12:24:03 PM PDT by Crawdad (So the guy says to the doctor, "It hurts when I do this.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 776 | View Replies]

To: Krodg

I don't even know what to think about that.


795 posted on 04/21/2006 12:24:31 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 789 | View Replies]

To: All
Ok when you all went to Kim's brother's myspace.com page....did you all click on Kim's myspace.com account? Cause when you do....there's interesting stuff on there.... ;)

Let's see...our bachelorette is 5'5...slim...puts her ethnicity as 'other'....she's a Gemini...she says her income is 30-45K a year....she has a company called 'RockNRoll Model Management......

And....her Quote is:

""Only You Can Start A Forest Fire""

796 posted on 04/21/2006 12:24:37 PM PDT by BossLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 751 | View Replies]

To: snarkytart
Is this his THEORY, or he is citing sources???

Theory

797 posted on 04/21/2006 12:24:48 PM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 788 | View Replies]

To: snarkytart

This is his theory; he can't believe the DA is so dumb. He MUST have an inside witness.


798 posted on 04/21/2006 12:25:19 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 788 | View Replies]

To: Swanks

Good point. But she didn't identify herself to the 911 operator nor was she there when the police showed up to respond/handle her complaint. And then she couldn't make up her mind where she exactly heard the slur, in front of the house, or over by the wall which is a distance from the house.


799 posted on 04/21/2006 12:25:51 PM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 771 | View Replies]

To: All
If someone is talking why the negative DNA test?
800 posted on 04/21/2006 12:25:57 PM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 794 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 761-780781-800801-820 ... 1,601-1,619 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson