Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Critics Assail Rumsfeld, But What Is Their Plan?
New York Observer ^ | 4/24/2006 | Richard Brookhiser

Posted on 04/19/2006 6:25:32 AM PDT by kellynla

So The New York Times has found six generals who want Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld to resign. The peace party often makes a show of embracing the martial virtues, though they should be careful what they ask for. People often suspect a ruse, and the uniformed front men that come forward are not necessarily top quality.

In 1864, at the climax of the Civil War, the Democrats tried to unseat Abraham Lincoln with “the young Napoleon,” Gen. George B. McClellan. McClellan had commanded the Union’s armies, but chafed at the civilians under whom he served: He called Lincoln a “well-meaning baboon.” But what should McClellan have been called? This is what the historian John Keegan calls him: “vain, vainglorious, opinionated, worldly, self-satisfied, ostentatiously busy …. [H]e resembled [Douglas] MacArthur in his arrogance and George C. Marshall in his hauteur, [while lacking] the former’s dynamism and the latter’s strength of character …. ” Young Napoleon managed to carry only three states for the peace party. If the insurgents of the Confederacy had been able to vote, no doubt he would have done better.

Let us assume that Mr. Rumsfeld’s critics, and Mr. Rumsfeld himself, are all, all honorable men. Real philosophical issues divide them, which makes their dispute more than a catfight, and something other than the obvious protest of outraged experts against the bumbling of outsiders.

In the soft days before 9/11, Mr. Rumsfeld came to the Pentagon intent on transformation—making the military more high-tech, breaking down the barriers to inter-service cooperation. This is an old fight, for the Pentagon, like any corporation, must evolve to live; if it doesn’t, it becomes General Motors. Tail-kickers like Mr. Rumsfeld naturally acquire enemies,

(Excerpt) Read more at observer.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; iraq; rummy; rumsfield; war
We've liberated FIFTY-MILLION PEOPLE in less than three years with less than 2000 KIA's.

The Left's poster boys LBJ, JFK and FDR would have given their right arms for successes like these.

Semper Fi, Kelly

1 posted on 04/19/2006 6:25:35 AM PDT by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kellynla
The Left's poster boys LBJ, JFK and FDR would have given their right arms for successes like these.

For all the failings of those three, they still believed in the righteousness of American power, so I doubt they would be on the side of the moonbats were they alive today.

2 posted on 04/19/2006 6:27:37 AM PDT by dirtboy (Illegal is to immigration is as methyl is to alcohol - both make a good thing toxic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Fortunately, in this country, unlike most places in the world, we don't allow a majority of Generals the right to select our civilian leaders. Tonight I'm seeing my nephew whom I love. He was born in Peru and grew up in Venezuela. His wife is Mexican. But he's Kansan to the core. Point? Of those four countries, this is the only one that even comes close to a true civilian government.


3 posted on 04/19/2006 6:31:03 AM PDT by Mercat (It's still Easter!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Since one critic is the object of a ZINNI FOR SENATE movement, his motive is clear.

Since the other generals are part of a POWELL FOR PRESIDENT movement, I'd say their motives are clear as well.

Too bad these generals forgot DUTY HONOR COUNTRY and put political aspirations first.

Seems to me that's how the VN war was lost.

4 posted on 04/19/2006 6:35:37 AM PDT by OldFriend (I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Plan? Plan? We don't need no steenking plan!


5 posted on 04/19/2006 6:36:20 AM PDT by battlecry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

"Critics Assail Rumsfeld, But What Is Their Plan?"

Just the usual leftist, "liberal" hate anything Bush. Hate anything American, realistic or pragmatic. Anything military.


6 posted on 04/19/2006 6:36:38 AM PDT by garyhope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Easy, they are just setting things up for a Wesley Clark candidacy, with all of these generals supporting Herr Clark.


7 posted on 04/19/2006 6:38:03 AM PDT by Clemenza (Amor de mi Vida, Donde Estas?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
The left simply cannot grasp the big picture. The Iraq operation was a success only if because we have gotten rid of Hussein. (And I hope he is soon dead.) Everything else is gravy. I am for the democratization of Iraq, but I knew that would be a far more difficult task than deposing Hussein.

At the start of the war my wife asked me what will happen to Bush's then very strong poll numbers. I told her the longer we are in Iraq, (and I thought five years would be the minimum), the more his numbers will decline. I knew this war would not be like any other conventional war, and I knew that the backstabbing left would turn into traitors at the first opportunity. I have never lost faith in the mission, and the recent revelations concerning Hussein's documents have proved Bush more right than ever.

8 posted on 04/19/2006 6:46:29 AM PDT by driftless ( For life-long happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

I think that most of us would follow DR up any hill.


9 posted on 04/19/2006 7:01:58 AM PDT by ANGGAPO (LayteGulfBeachClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ANGGAPO

well Saddam Hussein was a "bad actor" who needed to be taken out and the only regrets I have is that we didn't finish the job in 1991 and we let the S.O.B. live when we finally did capture him.

And as far as I'm concerned, the day we captured Saddam Hussein was the day we found the WMD!

Semper Fi,
Kelly


10 posted on 04/19/2006 7:17:26 AM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots. Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Tail-Kickers....we need MORE tail-Kickers in the administration!!


11 posted on 04/19/2006 8:09:14 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion: The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience. T)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza

Wesley Clark will be Hillary's V.P. candidate!!


12 posted on 04/19/2006 8:11:08 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion: The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience. T)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
There plan is to run away and hide under then bed while sending billions in tribute to the Arab states to buy their love with "increased Foreign aid". There plan would be "Billion in Tribute, not one cent for Defense".
13 posted on 04/19/2006 8:31:18 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (The Democrat Party. For those who value slogans over solutions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

14 posted on 04/19/2006 9:29:56 AM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson