Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US to Watch for Gas Price-gouging: Bush
Reuters ^ | 4/18/2006 | Staff Writers

Posted on 04/18/2006 8:09:46 AM PDT by ex-Texan

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President George W. Bush said on Tuesday he is "concerned" about high gasoline prices, and pledged that the U.S. government will keep a close watch out for profiteering.

"I'm concerned about higher gasoline prices," Bush said at a Rose Garden news conference to name new staff appointments.

"The government has the responsibility to make sure that we watch very carefully and investigate possible price-gouging, and we will do just that," Bush said in unprompted remarks about energy prices.

U.S. crude oil futures hit a record of $70.88 a barrel on Tuesday on fears of supply disruptions in Iran stemming from its nuclear standoff with the West, as well as lingering outages in Nigeria.

U.S. retail gasoline prices rose 10 cents last week to average $2.78 a gallon, up 29 cents over the last three weeks and 55 cents higher than a year ago, the government said on Monday.

Bush said high crude oil prices, rising summer driving demand and a switch to new motor gasoline standards is keeping gasoline prices high.

"It's tight supply worldwide and we've got increasing demand from countries like India and China, which means that any disruption of supply ... (is) going to cause the price of crude to go up," Bush said.

More drivers will take to the road this summer, which will also boost demand, he said.

"At this time of year people are beginning to drive more, getting out on the highways, taking a little time off," Bush said. "That increasing demand is also part of the reason the price of gasoline is going up."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: bush; fuelgouging; fuelprice; fuelpricing; gasolineprices; gasprices; gouge; pricefix; pricefixing; pricegouging
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 441-446 next last
To: John W
While I don't disagree with what you have pointed out, don't you think there is a tipping point beyond which we have serious economic problems simply due to the cost?

We don't live in never-never land.

Reality is what it is.

Prices go up when demand exceeds supply.

Period.

A rise in price causes demand to decrease to the point it matches supply: when gas prices go up, people buy cars with better gas mileage and start car-pooling, which decreases demand.

Artificially depressing price causes demand to chronically exceed supply, which eventually results in shortages. Shortages lead to rationing. Rationing leads to corruption.

Bottom line is, what do you trust more? The free market system, or government bureaucracy?

Government bureaucracy has caused health care costs to increase from 1% of GDP to 15% of GDP in the last fifty years.

Government bureaucracy has created dangerous inner-city public school systems that resemble prisons rather than places of learning and cost $10,000 per year per student, half of whom are functionally illiterate at graduation.

The choice is up to you.

141 posted on 04/18/2006 9:17:04 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam Factoid:After forcing young girls to watch his men execute their fathers, Muhammad raped them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr
My wife and I were planning on a drive to Myrtle Beach. If the prices go above $3.00 we will be canceling. Just like we did last year.
142 posted on 04/18/2006 9:17:17 AM PDT by commonerX (n)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Wasn't there a case recently where a State fined a gas station for actually dropping prices below a certain point?

Minnesota, I believe. I doubt that's what the profit police have in mind, though.

143 posted on 04/18/2006 9:17:40 AM PDT by gogeo (The /sarc tag is a form of training wheels for those unable to discern intellectual subtlety.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

What exactly do you call $3.00 per gallon and exhorbitant profits. What does he expect....


144 posted on 04/18/2006 9:18:53 AM PDT by applpie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ccmay
If I wanted this sort of idiotic kindergarten economics from the mouth of my President, I'd have voted for Kerry.

Well said.

145 posted on 04/18/2006 9:19:18 AM PDT by gogeo (The /sarc tag is a form of training wheels for those unable to discern intellectual subtlety.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary; IowaProf
Ah, so it's OK for you to profit, but not OK for those nasty traders and 'speculators'.

Got it.

146 posted on 04/18/2006 9:19:42 AM PDT by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: commonerX

Prices in Destin go up each year regardless of the cost of gas, the economy, etc. I guess they get their price......but it won't be from me.


147 posted on 04/18/2006 9:19:51 AM PDT by AxelPaulsenJr (More people died in Ted Kennedy's car than hunting with Dick Cheney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: From many - one.
Well, it took 126 posts, but finally a practical and effective policy appears.

Nicely said!

148 posted on 04/18/2006 9:20:43 AM PDT by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: IowaProf
The company just made 36 billion dollars. Don't you think the CEO is entitled to 1% of that? Give me a break!

NO, and NO again...

If this company was selling ice cream, that's one thing...But it's not, it's oil...A lot of folks have to buy this oil in the winter to stay alive...And some don't make it...

There's no competition...We pay or die...

36 billion bucks...That's 3,600 stacks of 1,000,000, dollars PROFIT...And that's fine IF I chose to buy their product and make them rich...But when they force me to pay them, something needs to be done...ANYTHING...

149 posted on 04/18/2006 9:20:44 AM PDT by Iscool (You mess with me, you mess with the whole trailer park...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: j_k_l
That is expected but I don't hear a peep from so called conservatives about eliminating the tax on gas either. We have to “tighten our belts”, how about government leading by example?

In my state, gas tax proceeds are dedicated to roads. How exactly would I benefit from ending road construction and maintenance, and laying off DOT employees?

The market is telling you something...use less!!!

150 posted on 04/18/2006 9:21:22 AM PDT by gogeo (The /sarc tag is a form of training wheels for those unable to discern intellectual subtlety.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: IowaProf
I am afraid, but he does not understand economics.

Sure he does. Look at how great he did with the Texas Rangers!

151 posted on 04/18/2006 9:21:41 AM PDT by 54-46 Was My Number (Right now, somebody else got that number)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg

That's pretty cool...


152 posted on 04/18/2006 9:22:08 AM PDT by MD_Willington_1976
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Iscool
A typical hydro electric generator runs a shaft speed of around 900-1200 rpm. It's conceivable that those speeds can be achieved with a wave action design. The problem is you just wouldn't be able to develop enough torque to generate much juice. It would be like trying to jack up a car with a stack of sponges. In a hydro damn, you use the hydraulic power of water, many many tons of pressure to turn a turbine. There is a LOT of torque there. Once you have all that water flowing through the tube, it can't be stopped suddenly.
153 posted on 04/18/2006 9:22:09 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Democratshavenobrains
I'd be curious to know how many people who demanded George Bush personally stop the Dubai company from completing a private business transaction are now espousing a hands off approach to gas prices.

Where's that bunny picture when you need it?

154 posted on 04/18/2006 9:22:30 AM PDT by gogeo (The /sarc tag is a form of training wheels for those unable to discern intellectual subtlety.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: SAJ

It's HOW they do it that wrong. trading supply and demand is one thing. Creating an artificial fear market is another.


155 posted on 04/18/2006 9:23:28 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: ccmay

I'll just stay bent over and take it since it's the patriotic thing to do. </sarcasm>


156 posted on 04/18/2006 9:25:23 AM PDT by flair2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Pessimist
The root of the word monopoly is "mono" - one. There are many oil companies.

Ya, there are about 5 that service the U.S...And they eat, sleep and pro-create together...Think of your hand, with 5 fingers...

157 posted on 04/18/2006 9:25:54 AM PDT by Iscool (You mess with me, you mess with the whole trailer park...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: rhombus
"My crystal ball told me Iran would create a panic about oil. Hopefully I'll know when to bail out too."

It will not be a sudden drop, so you're safe. They will have to burn up all those long contracts first. Cheap oil will be stacked up for next winters futures, if there is any cheap oil to be had that is...

158 posted on 04/18/2006 9:26:28 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
He sure did. He made 'ol blow hard O'Reilly look like a dumbass in economics. Even my 16 year old daughter said Cavuto really taught him a thing or two.

You'd think O'Reilly would learn after awhile.

159 posted on 04/18/2006 9:27:17 AM PDT by gogeo (The /sarc tag is a form of training wheels for those unable to discern intellectual subtlety.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
When you buy stock in the stock market and eventually sell it at a profit, aren't you "price gouging?"

No.

Hydrocarbons are simply not comparable to stocks. Hydrocarbon fuels are a controlled commodity combining limited and quasi-monopolistic capacities for acquisition, refining, and distribution. The free market plays a limited role in the sense that producers can force non-use of the product (over a very long term) by over-pricing it, but the capacity for short-term "gouging" (taking advantage of product-need without regard to production cost) remains a problem in any controlled commodity market.

160 posted on 04/18/2006 9:28:05 AM PDT by atlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 441-446 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson