Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Were Duke Players Victims of an E-Mail Sting? (new accusation)
Time Magazine ^ | Apr. 14, 2006 | FULTON AND SARAH KWAK

Posted on 04/16/2006 9:05:32 PM PDT by Michael2001

With a grand jury now expected to convene Monday to weigh indictments of two or three of the Duke lacrosse players tied to allegations of raping an exotic dancer, defense lawyers say they fear their clients are being targeted in a setup or sting operation possibly perpetrated by law enforcement. The lawyers have advised the players not to trust or respond to any e-mails sent to each other, one attorney tells Time.

The explosive allegations stem from an e-mail message sent in the last few days to several players from the e-mail address of another player, stating he was going to tell the police a crime occurred and implicate key players. The player denies he sent it. This comes after the recent revelations of the now infamous email sent by a Duke player hours after the alleged crime, in which he joked he was going to have more strippers over and "kill the bitches'; defense lawyers do not dispute that message's authenticity, though they insist it has no bearing on their clients' culpability. "The police said (the new e-mail) came from a confidential informant, but we have reason to believe it came from the police, hoping it would make all the players nervous," says one defense lawyer. "That didn't work." A spokesperson at the Durham Police Department would not comment on the allegations of a set-up, and said she would not forward Time's inquiries to any of her superiors over the holiday weekend. No one at the Durham County District Attorney's Office could be reached for comment Friday.

The lawyers' unsubstantiated accusations came on a busy Good Friday in Durham, when it became known that Durham police investigators had attempted the night before to interview some players on campus about the case. Meanwhile, defense lawyers tell Time they spent part of Friday trying unsuccessfully to talk the Durham County district attorney Michael Nifong out of taking the rape case before a grand jury after the Easter weekend. "What I wished and hoped he would do is conclude there is not enough evidence to proceed," says one defense attorney.

Despite the highly publicized lack of initial DNA evidence linking any player to a crime, grand jurors will be presented with the accuser's statement, her visual identification of the players from photos and a police report from a hospital examination stating "injuries consistent with being sexually assaulted vaginally and anally." Nifong is also still awaiting results of DNA analysis from a private lab in North Carolina to compare with those already received from the state's own crime lab. Blood was taken from the three captains of the team. Saliva cheek swabs were used to gather DNA from 43 players; the lone black player on the team was not tested, as the African-American accuser has said her attackers were white. So far none of the Duke players have been subpoened to appear before the grand jury as witnesses, nor has a second woman also hired as an exotic dancer at the team's Spring Break party at an off-campus house on the night of March 13.

On Thursday, Durham police released the audio tape of a dispatch call made by a responding officer from a Kroger parking lot about four miles from the house where the team party took place. The officer, responding to a 911 call, noted that the accuser was in a drunken state. "She's just passed out drunk," the officer says. D efense lawyers also point to the officer's statement that he has a "24- hour hold" situation — meaning possibly a night in jail on a drunk and disorderly charge. Defense lawyers tell Time they will argue that it was expressly to avoid that possibility that the accuser fabricated the rape charge. "I know which I'd choose," says one defense attorney.

Harder to explain away is the hospital examination report. Defense lawyers will try to poke holes at it by searching for a lag time between the 911 call and the accuser's arrival at the hospital. The district attorney's office has not made public the police report stating time of arrival, and neither has the hospital.

Lawyers say a photo taken of the accuser at 12:40 a.m. shows her being helped into the car by some of the Duke players. The 911 call was made at 1:30 a.m., and she reportedly left the hospital at approximately 11 a.m. later that morning after spending five or six hours there.

Defense lawyers tell Time they also have pictures, not yet turned over to the DA's office, of the main room at the party showing the players sitting in a semi-circle "watching the show." "They are bored, they're practically yawning. This is not a group of rowdy, dangerous people," says one of the attorneys.

No one should be surprised that District Attorney Nifong is proceeding with the case despite the lack of initial DNA evidence. Nifong made his intentions clear on April 11, the day after the initial DNA results went public, at a forum at North Carolina Central University, where the accuser is a student. "Anytime you have a victim who can identify her assailant, then what you have is a case a judge must let go to the jury," he said.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: duke; dukelax; dukeu; johnwayne
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-139 next last
To: babygene

Ah, sorry about that. I guess it is time for me to get back to work anyway.


61 posted on 04/16/2006 10:55:49 PM PDT by Northern Alliance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

All right I'll go to bed. But you know exactly what I mean. It was not unusual in any way.


62 posted on 04/16/2006 10:56:03 PM PDT by Mr. Rational
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Michael2001
"The police said (the new e-mail) came from a confidential informant, but we have reason to believe it came from the police, hoping it would make all the players nervous"

I heard on Fox (I think) that the person who supposedly sent this 2nd email was in class at the time the mail was transmitted.

Also, a few questions for anyone: 1) Because the pictures identifying the athletes were posted all over town, can the defense team do anything about this if the case is taken to trial? And, 2) Has it been revealed where the dancer was BEFORE going to the guy's house?
63 posted on 04/16/2006 10:58:32 PM PDT by peggybac (Tolerance is the virtue of believing in nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Rational

I agree with you!


64 posted on 04/16/2006 10:58:43 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: peggybac

Yes, they can; they can move to have her identification strikened for that very reason.

And nobody knows where she was before she was dropped off.


65 posted on 04/16/2006 11:02:42 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: RushCrush

Rush, are you keeping up with this story?


66 posted on 04/16/2006 11:03:22 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: peggybac

Doesn't matter that he was in class at the time of the email transmission... Lots of email programs have automatic settings where you can set it to send/receive all email at a certain (pre-set) time.


67 posted on 04/16/2006 11:12:55 PM PDT by BagCamAddict (Prayers for the victims - human and animal - of Katrina and Rita)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Rational
They didn't do that. Logically the only reason is they knew they would pass the test.

I don't think you understood my question.

My suspicion is that she was a walking sperm bank.

I want to know if they found DNA from anyone in her and how many anyones.

My guess is 3 to 6, maybe more.

68 posted on 04/16/2006 11:22:48 PM PDT by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Northern Alliance
"So you have a civil right not to have a DNA test - is that your position?"


Actually you do have a right not to be DNA tested. Read the 4th Amendment to the US Constitution for more.
69 posted on 04/16/2006 11:25:23 PM PDT by RHINO369
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: CurlyDave
Was Bubba in the neighborhood?
70 posted on 04/16/2006 11:26:05 PM PDT by Ursus arctos horribilis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman
somebody refresh me.....was there ANY semen found ?..... not only that.....but there is no way a DA in any other district could get away with testing men of one color and not the other, no matter what the victim says.....especially if the DA believes the victim was tipsy or "drugged" or knocked out.....
71 posted on 04/16/2006 11:35:02 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Michael2001; Howlin

I have no idea whether this is true, but I think the search warrants not only compelled the suspect lacrosse players to give DNA evidence, but also allowed the police to seize the suspects' (and as best I could tell, their roommates') computers and hard drives. If the Durham police have the players' hard drives, they could have compromised their passwords.

There were also reports (in the articles about the "kill a stripper" e-mail sent by one of the players) that Duke was cooperating with the Durham police in turning over information, including e-mails to and from the players that were on Duke's servers. It's possible that Duke is further cooperating with the D.A. by allowing them to spoof players' addresses to run a sting operation.


72 posted on 04/16/2006 11:38:51 PM PDT by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Northern Alliance
I doubt a judge would find probable cause to compel a dark-skinned black male to provide DNA samples if the rape victim said the perpetrator was pale white male. The victim has excluded dark-skinned black persons from the category of persons who allegedly raped her.

Whether the victim is lying about being raped is a different issue. I don't know whether she is or isn't. All I know is that the D.A. has been unfairly trying this case in the media since day 1 in an attempt to win a primary election. In most cases, trial by media isn't fair to the suspects or the victim (although rape victims get special protection (like not being named by the MSM) that victims of other crimes don't get).
73 posted on 04/16/2006 11:48:29 PM PDT by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
It sounds like a pretty clever law enforcement ruse to me.
I'd think you would have to be pretty stupid to fall for it, though.
Wouldn't most people just pick up the phone?

---
That might be the objective of the e-mail, if the phones are tapped.
74 posted on 04/17/2006 12:14:36 AM PDT by Cheburashka (World's only Spatula City certified spatula repair and maintenance specialist!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: BagCamAddict
Doesn't matter that he was in class at the time of the email transmission... Lots of email programs have automatic settings where you can set it to send/receive all email at a certain (pre-set) time.

All they'd have to do is look at the email headers. From those, they could tell instantly whether the email actually was sent from the computer/dorm room of the student or from somewhere else (such as from the DA's office).

Faking the "FROM:" line, though, is pathetically simple. Anyone with an Internet connection can do it in seconds if they know how. The risk you take is that the headers will give you away, if the recipient is knowledgeable enough to take a look at them.

75 posted on 04/17/2006 12:23:20 AM PDT by Dont Mention the War (This tagline is false.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Mephari

Uhm.. maybe a stripper might lie????


76 posted on 04/17/2006 12:25:32 AM PDT by BruceysMom (.I'm hot & not in a good way, menopause ain't for sissies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: BruceysMom
Uhm.. maybe a stripper might lie????
---
Oh, please. That's against the Strippers' Oath of Professional Conduct.
77 posted on 04/17/2006 12:55:30 AM PDT by Cheburashka (World's only Spatula City certified spatula repair and maintenance specialist!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

Apparently she wasn't raped "after" She had the bruises on her legs before she got to the party. And lack of any semen is nothing, someone could have worn a condom. So if she doesn't have any semen evidence, that's still not proving anything about the person who did it. It just wasn't the "rich white boys" she's trying to shake down, that's all.


78 posted on 04/17/2006 1:15:38 AM PDT by Shimmer128
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Chewbacca; nickcarraway; Mr. Rational
If she was raped, was it then done by the officer transporting her to the hospital or by hospital employees? This just gets stranger by the day.

The missing forty-five minutes is key ..............

This girl mistreated herself, her "pimp" and another may have done some things to her also.

There is NO CASE against the Duke players. This DA is one sick, needy character.

And Jesse Jackasson is just another pimp on the prowl. Bring on the satellite trucks.

79 posted on 04/17/2006 2:03:08 AM PDT by beyond the sea (Oh, for the days when "disrespect" was just a noun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Michael2001

"The lawyers have advised the players not to trust or respond to any e-mails sent to each other, one attorney tells Time."

The players (and anybody else smart enough to go to Duke) should understand that conventional email is insecure to start with, particularly if you are under investigation for a felony.


80 posted on 04/17/2006 2:24:52 AM PDT by gondramB (Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's and unto God that which is God's.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-139 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson