Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran dares US to attack
News.com.au ^ | 4-15-2006 | Stefan Smith

Posted on 04/15/2006 8:11:03 AM PDT by Hadean

IRAN has said it could defeat any American military action over its controversial nuclear drive, in one of the Islamic regime's boldest challenges yet to the United States.

"You can start a war but it won't be you who finishes it," said General Yahya Rahim Safavi, the head of the Revolutionary Guards and among the regime's most powerful figures.

"The Americans know better than anyone that their troops in the region and in Iraq are vulnerable. I would advise them not to commit such a strategic error," he told reporters on the sidelines of a pro-Palestinian conference in Tehran.

The United States accuses Iran of using an atomic energy drive as a mask for weapons development. Last weekend US news reports said President George W. Bush's administration was refining plans for preventive strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities.

"I would advise them to first get out of their quagmire in Iraq before getting into an even bigger one," General Safavi said with a grin.

"We have American forces in the region under total surveillance. For the past two years, we have been ready for any scenario, whether sanctions or an attack."

Advertisement: Iran announced this week it had successfully enriched uranium to make nuclear fuel, despite a UN Security Council demand for the sensitive work to be halted by April 28.

The Islamic regime says it only wants to generate atomic energy, but enrichment can be extended to make the fissile core of a nuclear warhead -- something the United States is convinced that "axis of evil" member Iran wants to acquire.

At a Friday prayer sermon in Tehran, senior cleric Ayatollah Ahmad Janati simply branded the US as a "decaying power" lacking the "stamina" to block Iran's ambitions.

And hardline President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said that a US push for tough United Nations sanctions was of "no importance".

"She is free to say whatever she wants," the president replied when asked to respond to comments by US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice highlighting part of the UN charter that provides for sanctions backed up by the threat of military action.

"We give no importance to her comments," he said with a broad smile.

On Thursday, Ms Rice said that faced with Iran's intransigence, the United States "will look at the full range of options available to the United Nations".

"There is no doubt that Iran continues to defy the will of the international community," Rice said, after Iran also dismissed a personal appeal from the UN atomic watchdog chief Mohamed ElBaradei.

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief must give a report at the end of April on Iranian compliance with the Security Council demand. In Tehran he said that after three years of investigations Iran's activities were "still hazy and not very clear".

Although the United States has been prodding the council to take a tough stand against the Islamic republic, including possible sanctions, it has run into opposition from veto-wielding members Russia and China.

Representatives of the five permanent members of the Security Council plus Germany are to meet in Moscow Tuesday to discuss the crisis.

In seeking to deter international action, Iran has been playing up its oil wealth, its military might in strategic Gulf waters and its influence across the region -- such as in Iraq, Lebanon and the Palestinian territories.

(snip)


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: gwot; iran; iranstrikes; israel; nuclear; safavi; un; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last
To: Hadean

Will somebody please drop this guy Ahmadinejad?


21 posted on 04/15/2006 8:36:27 AM PDT by Radix (Stop domestic violence. Beat abroad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hadean
This all sounds a bit familiar doesn't it?

 

The Collected Quotations of "Baghdad Bob," Mohammed Saeed al-Sahaf: The Iraqi Minister of DisInformation

Mocking the Coalition's Attempt To Target Saddam Hussein:
"These villains, and in particular the villain Bush, said they had struck Iraq with 40 cruise missiles to assassinate President Saddam Hussein.  Not only are they disappointed, I think they are hysterical."

Attempting to Acknowledge What Was Happening Militarily Beyond Baghdad:
March 22, 2003

"Maybe they will enter Umm Qasr and Basra, but how will they enter Baghdad?  It will be a big oven for them. They can penetrate our borders but they cannot reach Baghdad.  They will try to pull our army and troops out but we are well aware of their plans and they will fail."

March 23, 2003
"In Umm Qasr, the fighting is fierce and we have inflicted many damages.  The stupid enemy, the Americans and British, failed completely.  They're not making any penetration."

As Televised Reports of U.S. Forces Approaching the Outskirts of Western Baghdad Are Shown:
"They are not any place.  They are on the move everywhere.  They are a snake moving in the desert.  They hold no place in Iraq.  This is an illusion."

After U.S. Forces Seized Baghdad's Airport:
"We butchered the force present at the airport.  We have retaken the airport!  There are no Americans there!"

After U.S. Troops Penetrated Central Baghdad:
April 5, 2003

"Nobody came here. Those America losers, I think their repeated frequent lies are bringing them down very rapidly....  Baghdad is secure, is safe."

April 5, 2003
"They are not near Baghdad. Don't believe them....  They said they entered with...  tanks in the middle of the capital.  They claim that they - I tell you, I... that this speech is too far from the reality. It is a part of this sickness of their plan. There is no an... - no any existence to the American troops or for the troops in Baghdad at all."

April 6, 2003
"Whenever we attack, they retreat.  When we pound them with missiles and heavy artillery, they retreat even deeper.  But when we stopped pounding, they pushed to the airport for propaganda purposes."

April 7, 2003
"The Americans are not there.  They're not in Baghdad.  There are no troops there.  Never.  They're not at all."

April 7, 2003
"U.S. forces learned a lesson last night they will never forget.  We slaughtered them and will continue to slaughter them."

April 7, 2003
"There is no presence of American infidels in the city of Baghdad."

With Media Pictures of U.S. Troops Being Shown Standing Under the Giant Crossed Swords in Saddam's Favorite Parade Grounds in Baghdad, While Giving a Press Briefing Around the Corner:
"There you can see, there is nothing going on."

After U.S. Missiles Destroyed His Office in the Information Ministry and He was Forced to Give Press Briefings on the Street:
"They will be burnt.  We are going to tackle them."

Disputing His Own Assertions of No Coalition Troops in Baghdad:
"We blocked them inside the city.  Their rear is blocked....  They pushed a few of their armored carriers and some tanks with their soldiers.  We besieged them and I think we will finish them soon."

While American Soldiers Are Showering in Saddam's Bathroom Nearby Presidential Palace:
"We have killed most of the [coalition] infidels, and I think we will finish off the rest soon."

After Being Shown Footage of Iraqi Soldiers Surrendering:
"Those are not Iraqi soldiers at all."

April 7, 2003
"This invasion will end in failure."

April 8, 2003
"Baghdad Bob" disappeared, perhaps forever.  On the other hand, perhaps he will return as head of the DNC or be awarded a drive time show on Air Americal talk radio.

 

 

22 posted on 04/15/2006 8:36:58 AM PDT by HawaiianGecko (Timing has a lot to do with the outcome of a rain dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hadean

What was it Saddam was saying back in Gulf War I ... it was to be the mother of all wars? That war was over in less than 100 hours ... in Gulf War II the coalition forces overran most of Iraq in less than 3 weeks. Iran thinks it would fare any better?


23 posted on 04/15/2006 8:38:25 AM PDT by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hgro
The general population of Iran is basically moderate.

The leadership of a country is always the responsibility of the people and the people's acts of commission or omission.

24 posted on 04/15/2006 8:39:18 AM PDT by William Terrell (Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Hadean
"I would advise them to first get out of their quagmire in Iraq before getting into an even bigger one," General Safavi said with a grin.

Spoken like a true Democrat.

25 posted on 04/15/2006 8:40:36 AM PDT by lowbridge (I want to die peacefully in my sleep like my grandfather. Not screaming, like his passengers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandEagle
Interesting game of Chicken they are playing.
 

Yes, but it is sure driving up the price of oil and making them a ton of money.  The price of oil has gone up 25% in the last few weeks and their cost of production has gone up zero.

 

26 posted on 04/15/2006 8:41:09 AM PDT by HawaiianGecko (Timing has a lot to do with the outcome of a rain dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mtbopfuyn
Baghdad Bob is now in Iran?

Close. Spokesperson for the Democratic National Committee.

27 posted on 04/15/2006 8:41:14 AM PDT by lowbridge (I want to die peacefully in my sleep like my grandfather. Not screaming, like his passengers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: crashthe24

Exactly. How can the Dims not be ashamed when a sworn enemy of the US is quoting them approvingly? Simply amazing.


29 posted on 04/15/2006 8:44:12 AM PDT by mkmensinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Hadean
"I would advise them to first get out of their quagmire in Iraq before getting into an even bigger one," General Safavi said with a grin.

At least we know the General reads the New York Times and the Washington Post!

30 posted on 04/15/2006 8:46:30 AM PDT by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puppage
Futures in Glass Ashtray market have slid dramatically in off-hours trading(Wall Street-Dow Jones News Wire)
31 posted on 04/15/2006 8:47:35 AM PDT by jmq (Islam=Religion of Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Hadean

just lob one into their executive bathroom


32 posted on 04/15/2006 8:48:42 AM PDT by InvisibleChurch (Tolerance is the last virtue of a depraved society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hadean

Lets be honest. Iranian and Syrian jihadist with the support of their governments have been killing our troops left and right. They have also been killing Iraqi Air Force pilots who were involved with the war in the 1980's. Iran has as much control of Iraq as we do.

If we attack Iran it will be an extremely bloody war on both sides. The people of the United States are not prepared for such a war and our media is ready to support the enemy a 100 fold and they will make it look as if Iran is G-D himself and has destroyed our forces.

Israel has already promised that they will not sneak attack Iran (read it in today's New York Post). Europe WANTS Iran to get the bomb and for them to use it on Israel. Europe (and I bet many in the US) believes that getting rid of Israel will solve many of the world's problems. After Iran nukes Israel, then, NATO will attack Iran, so they can secure themselves. Killing to birds...

Iran is going to get the bomb...only then will "we" attack.


33 posted on 04/15/2006 8:50:23 AM PDT by SelectiveJNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HawaiianGecko
Excellent POINT! I never though of that.
Very dangerious gamble don't you think?
34 posted on 04/15/2006 8:51:41 AM PDT by GrandEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: HawaiianGecko

Wonderful trip down memory lane:) Thanks for the chuckles.

It does point something out that we can't underestimate about this enemy. They are STILL out of touch with reality- it is the only way they cling to their defiant rants like the ones Iran is currently broadcasting. The problem with these people- they BELIEVE their lies.


35 posted on 04/15/2006 8:52:06 AM PDT by SE Mom (God Bless those who serve..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Hadean
Image hosted by Photobucket.com AmadHandJob better be careful what he wishes for...
36 posted on 04/15/2006 8:52:08 AM PDT by Chode (1967 UN Outer Space Treaty is bad for America and bad for humanity - DUMP IT. American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Javelina

For that to occur we'd have to manage the regime change
competently. I have yet to see evidence that we can do it.


37 posted on 04/15/2006 8:53:42 AM PDT by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
The third option is that he underestimates the US and is betting the entire farm that we won't do anything.

A fourth option is that he's been listing to Biden and the rest of the Dimms and is confident that they will stop Bush from taking action.

38 posted on 04/15/2006 8:54:41 AM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Hadean
"The Islamic regime says it only wants to generate atomic energy, but enrichment can be extended to make the fissile core of a nuclear warhead "

What the process requires in more separation of the isotope Uranium 235 from the natural Uranium 238. Typically, when the material has 20% Uranium 235 it is "enriched" enough for a power plant. When you have separated out enough Uranium 235 to have 90% Uranium 235, you have weapons grade material. The process takes huge amounts of energy to run centrifuges at near speed of sound rotation rates.

39 posted on 04/15/2006 8:55:58 AM PDT by jonrick46
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hadean

In reading this, I was struck with the thought that Iran's nuclear weapons capabilities are not altogether new, and not in Iran ... they think they've gained control over the long-rumored cache hidden in the Bekaa, bordering Syria and Lebanon. All this IAEA seal business within Iran was mere theater, backfilling the story line as far as just how Iran came to acquire the capability. This protects "someone," and Russia springs to mind.


40 posted on 04/15/2006 8:58:44 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson