Posted on 04/14/2006 8:51:17 AM PDT by Neville72
SITTING in a culture dish, a layer of chicken heart cells beats in synchrony. But this muscle layer was not sliced from an intact heart, nor even grown laboriously in the lab. Instead, it was "printed", using a technology that could be the future of tissue engineering.
Gabor Forgacs, a biophysicist at the University of Missouri in Columbia, described his "bioprinting" technique last week at the Experimental Biology 2006 meeting in San Francisco. It relies on droplets of "bioink", clumps of cells a few hundred micrometres in diameter, which Forgacs has found behave just like a liquid.
This means that droplets placed next to one another will flow together and fuse, forming layers, rings or other shapes, depending on how they were deposited. To print 3D structures, Forgacs and his colleagues alternate layers of supporting gel, dubbed "biopaper", with the bioink droplets. To build tubes that could serve as blood vessels, for instance, they lay down successive rings containing muscle and endothelial cells, which line our arteries and veins. "We can print any desired structure, in principle," Forgacs told the meeting.
Other tissue engineers have tried printing 3D structures, using modified ink-jet printers which spray cells suspended in liquid (New Scientist, 25 January 2003, p 16). Now Forgacs and a company called Sciperio have developed a device with printing heads that extrude clumps of cells mechanically so that they emerge one by one from a micropipette. This results in a higher density of cells in the final printed structure, meaning that an authentic tissue structure can be created faster.
Cells seem to survive the printing process well. When layers of chicken heart cells were printed they quickly begin behaving as they would in a real organ. "After 19 hours or so, the whole structure starts to beat in a synchronous manner," says Forgacs.
Most tissue engineers trying to build 3D structures start with a scaffold of the desired shape, which they seed with cells and grow for weeks in the lab. This is how Anthony Atala of Wake Forest University in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, and his colleagues grew the bladders which he successfully implanted into seven people (New Scientist, 8 April 2006, p 10). But if tissue engineering goes mainstream, faster and cheaper methods will be a boon. "Bioprinting is the way to go," says Vladimir Mironov, a tissue engineer at the Medical University of South Carolina in Charleston.
Pretty amazing stuff.
This is just too weird for words...shades of X-Files...
Perhaps the FSM has a really big printer. :-)
All I have to do is hold on for another 10-20 years and I can begin replacing worn out stuff. Simply amazing.
Actually - shades of the original Star Trek series..... this is truly amazing stuff. Who would have ever thought of "printing" a slurry of cells into a usable tissue?
WOW!
|
One evening while sweeping the floor, a careless janitor knocked over the glass.
CRASH!
When he went to get something to clean up the mess, the chicken heart started to grow.
Thump-thump. Thump-thump.
Anybody want to bet against radical life extention after reading this article and ones like the previous article on the seven replacement bladders grown from the patients' own cells at Wake Forest Univ.
If we could replace our faulty or worn out pancreases, livers, skin, kidneys, hearts, lungs, etc. and then do it over and over when necessary, exactly how long could lifetimes be extended? Hmmmmm?
There would seem to be so many applications of this, it's staggering to think of what this could mean. Hopefully it pans out and can be replicated with sufficient reliability.
Sex change operations just got a leg up!
I remember that article. Had no idea it meant they'd be printing out beating hearts within about three years.
H-O-L-Y COW! Too amazing.
And millions of Falun Gong prisoners breath a sigh of relief
I'm getting out the Jello and setting fire to the couch!
If it doesn't work for skin replacement, you'll end up looking like this.
There's the downside of radical life extention. A 500 year old Helen.
True, but what about the brain itself? Doesn't it deteriorate with age, too, just like any other organ? Don't know myself. Just asking. This stuff is too fascinating!
Am I the only one this creeps out?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.