And slandering the alleged slanderer will make you a righteous man.
Put your head back in the sand.
Excuse me? You've accused me of being
1. An atheist
2. A liberal
3. A nutjob libertarian
On what grounds? I'm not sure, but you're the only one libelling people here. I'm not attacking your faith, I'm just attacking you, for rank dishonesty and for the perpetuation of stupid strawmen (i.e. evolution = atheism).
Oh, and Lucy wasn't human.
Correct and non-controversial. Nobody suggests that Lucy was anything other than A. africanus.
Lucy was a monkey.
Thanks for playing boy, but you got that one wrong. Monkeys are Cercopithecidines (old world) or Platyrrhines (new world), and I don't know of morphological evidence that suggests that Lucy isn't Hominidae in good standing. But perhaps you could enlighten me (or not).
True, but then no one said differently.
You want to slander us and our faith, go to DailyKos, they'll welcome you there.
Where do you imagine he "slandered you and your faith"? This should be fun...
Oh, and Lucy wasn't human.
Not fully human in the modern sense, no, but she was much more human than most other extinct apes, something which the anti-evolutionists are hard-pressed to explain.
Lucy was a monkey.
Wow, what a bizarre claim. Please attempt to substantiate it. I'm just dying to be "educated" by someone who lacks even the knowledge of the difference between monkeys and apes.
And with certain exceptions, Men are not monkeys.
No, but we are apes -- apes of the human variety. Humans are *still* apes (and still primates, still eutherians, still mammals, still synapsids, still tetrapods, still vertebrates, still chordates, still eukaryotes, etc.)
If you disagree, please name one or more diagnostic features of the ape clade (i.e., features which apes have exclusive of all other animals, which can be used to identify a member of the ape group) which humans do not also share.