Replies

Kaker, this is a conservative website, not a nutjob libertarian website. You want to slander us and our faith, go to DailyKos, they'll welcome you there.

Excuse me? You've accused me of being

1. An atheist
2. A liberal
3. A nutjob libertarian

On what grounds? I'm not sure, but you're the only one libelling people here. I'm not attacking your faith, I'm just attacking you, for rank dishonesty and for the perpetuation of stupid strawmen (i.e. evolution = atheism).

Oh, and Lucy wasn't human.

Correct and non-controversial. Nobody suggests that Lucy was anything other than A. africanus.

Lucy was a monkey.

Thanks for playing boy, but you got that one wrong. Monkeys are Cercopithecidines (old world) or Platyrrhines (new world), and I don't know of morphological evidence that suggests that Lucy isn't Hominidae in good standing. But perhaps you could enlighten me (or not).

38 posted on 04/13/2006 1:27:57 PM PDT by Alter Kaker ("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)

To: Alter Kaker; DesScorp

Nobody suggests that Lucy was anything other than A. africanus.

I clearly need another cup of coffee. Lucy is A. afarensis, of course, not A. africanus.

Oh, and I'm still waiting on the mosaic of plattyrhine features you suggest she has.

76 posted on 04/13/2006 2:11:31 PM PDT by Alter Kaker ("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)

It has been proven that Lucy was a well traind pick pocket.

375 posted on 04/14/2006 8:08:27 AM PDT by Vaduz (and just think how clean the cities would become again.)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794