True, but then no one said differently.
You want to slander us and our faith, go to DailyKos, they'll welcome you there.
Where do you imagine he "slandered you and your faith"? This should be fun...
Oh, and Lucy wasn't human.
Not fully human in the modern sense, no, but she was much more human than most other extinct apes, something which the anti-evolutionists are hard-pressed to explain.
Lucy was a monkey.
Wow, what a bizarre claim. Please attempt to substantiate it. I'm just dying to be "educated" by someone who lacks even the knowledge of the difference between monkeys and apes.
And with certain exceptions, Men are not monkeys.
No, but we are apes -- apes of the human variety. Humans are *still* apes (and still primates, still eutherians, still mammals, still synapsids, still tetrapods, still vertebrates, still chordates, still eukaryotes, etc.)
If you disagree, please name one or more diagnostic features of the ape clade (i.e., features which apes have exclusive of all other animals, which can be used to identify a member of the ape group) which humans do not also share.
If you are still and Ape can you impregnate one or can one impregnate you?
I do believe that using the argument like dogs the different breeds came about from the mixing of different breeds any dog can impregnate another dog.
So can you or can you be impregnated by an Ape?
If not then the link on your post is false.
So using the example of dogs and apes does not hold water it is a false argument.