GO FIGURE
Posted on 04/13/2006 5:12:18 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
by Mark Finkelstein
April 13, 2006
As has been noted here before, the surest way for a Republican to get himself invited onto an MSM show and accorded respectful treatment is to be prepared to take shots at the Bush administration.
The time-tested technique was on display on this morning's Today, as Newt Gingrich got the kind of kid-glove treatment he could have only dreamed of back in his Speaker days when the MSM was vilifying him as 'the Gingrich Who Stole Christmas'.
At the top of the show, Matt Lauer teased Newt's appearance in these terms:
"A prominent politican is saying US policy in Iraq since toppling Saddam Hussein has been an enormous mistake. This isn't a Democrat. It's a Republican - former House Speaker Newt Gingrich."
When Lauer interviewed Newt later in the half-hour, first up was the more pressing matter of Iran's nuclear ambitions and our plans to thwart them. For the record, Newt favors first trying to foment a popular uprising. At the same time, he observed that "the Congress and the American people would think the military was not doing its job if they didn't have [military] plans. Plans and actions are two different things."
But as Newt waxed on about Iran, Lauer was unable to conceal his impatience to turn talk to the subject that earned Newt his invite: Gingrich's criticism of the Bush's Iraq policy.
Lauer wasted no time in trying to milk the matter for all its political worth: "Here's what you said about Iraq in South Dakota recently: 'It was an enormous mistake for us to try to occupy that country after June of 2003.' You went on to say 'we have to pull back and we have to recognize it.' If it was an enormous mistake, and by the way the administration wouldn't characterize it as occupation but as stabilizing the country for democracy, but if it was an enormous mistake in your opinion who's to blame?"
Newt's arm didn't have to be twisted too hard: "If you're playing the blame game, the President is the Commander-in-Chief. I assume [the installation of] Ambassador Bremer was his decision, the orders for Ambassador Bremer were his decision."
That said, Newt's criticism was much more limited than Today's build-up might have lead viewers to imagine. He argued that in Iraq we should have followed the same model as in Afghanistan, where we managed to create a government under President Karzai within three weeks. In contrast, he described the situation in Iraq as an 'occupation' and singled out Paul Bremer and the Bush policy that put him in Iraq for criticism. Gingrich described Bremer as having been a "proconsul" a term from from the days of empire for an official with great powers over a colony.
Newt prefaced his criticism with unequivocal support for the underlying mission: "I was totally for the war, I am totally for staying as long as it takes to defeat the terrorists and the murderers and the rapists who are trying to dominate the country. The Iraqi people want to be free and are dying every day to try to be free. I don't think we should cut and run."
Lauer mentioned that Newt has been visiting Iowa and New Hampshire - no doubt with an eye on '08. Is Gingrich trying to thread the Republican primary needle? Offer criticism that suggests he would make a better leader, while not appearing disloyal to the cause?
In any case, as can be seen from the screen capture, when it came to our Iraqi policy, Today predictably highlighted Gingrich's condemnation rather than his support.
Today Show/NewsBusters ping.
The MSM always win.
If they have Newt on, he can call them liars to their faces! I have the transcript of Newts lecture, and I have it recorded. LSM lies!!!!!!!!!!
LLS
No they don't...
What he addressed is THE PAST. Whatever happened, there is no going back. He accomplished nothing positive by what he said. He is experienced enough to know that would happen. He undermined the President and our troops for his own selfish political reasons. He's off my list as of today.
I saw his appearance. He told Matt he did not say what was reported in that context. He straightened it out with his own words, not some half-ass lazy reporters.
It was out of context as usual.
I believe that Newt is out there calling the original article that highlighted his "enormous mistake" statements as way out of context, and a blatant example of media misreporting.
I don't think the Today show heard this (Hey we got Newt bashing the Iraq War and Bush...Book Him!), and are probably disappointed in his comments. Newt probably knew he was booked on Today for more bashing, but it's the only way to get on the show.
Actually, this could be a great way to get past the liberal producers of every single mainstream media news show. Make statements that can be taken out of context to slime Bush or Republicans, then get on and say whatever the hell you want.
They won't win this. They have been misreporting Iraq from the beginning and it's about to catch up with them.
Things have improved in Iraq so enormously over the last year or so and continue doing so, but the MSM blatantly ignores that.
It won't be long until the progress being made here becomes too evident for them to conceal and I think it's all going to backfire on them.
And I CAN'T WAIT.
GO FIGURE
Most Americans don't "get" Newt. And how sick is this society ....... just his name "Newt" turns off a great number of ignorant voters.
Silly country.
With respect, they, (the MSM,Hollywood,Academia), control the US, and have for 40 years.
Saw Newt on Hanity & Colmes last night.
As you might expect, Newt DID NOT say what the headlines would have us believe.
Add another Conservative to the "battered wife syndrome" list of those who have lost heart, and their will.
Sounds like Newit is trying to play both sides of the fence
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.