Posted on 04/13/2006 2:06:14 AM PDT by SheLion
Z'actly!
They have to knock out "smoking related illnesses" to make room for all of the homosexual related illnesses. Both are choices.... only difference is homosexual behavior is acceptable.
I'm a "courteous smoker" and am really bothered by laws trying to take away my right to smoke all the while shoving "sexual diversity" in my face.
I suppose next they'll take away my right to chose what foods I eat because of the "obesity epidemic".
Thanks for the pings! Will be back after work!
I did some reasearch on this judge yesterday and it seems as if he is pretty sensible. Hoping for the best.
Absolute idiots. They celebrate the loss of freedoms so their clothes don't smell like smoke. People in this country are waaaay too fat, dumb and happy. Fascism creeps in the form of a nanny-state.
'fraid not
http://abclocal.go.com/wabc/story?section=nj&id=4082255
A federal judge on Thursday ruled that New Jersey's ban on indoor smoking in most public places should go into effect just after midnight Saturday, ending a last-ditch bid by a group of bar and restaurant owners who wanted it delayed.
The group contended the temporary injunction was needed because their businesses will lose businesses and may lay off workers while they await the outcome of a constitutional challenge to the smoking ban.
But U.S. District Judge Stanley Chesler nixed the bid for the injunction, saying the lawsuit by the New Jersey Hospitality Industry for Fairness Coalition is unlikely to succeed.
New Jersey at 12:01 a.m. Saturday is poised to become the 11th state to halt smoking in restaurants, bars, private office buildings and other indoor places. Regulations published by the state health department this week also mandate no smoking within 25 feet of a building.
The coalition of New Jersey restaurants, bars and bowling alleys sued the state last month over the new law because it allows smoking on the casino floors of Atlantic City's 12 gambling halls.
The coalition's lawsuit says the ban violates the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution by singling out casinos.
The casinos contend that banning smoking in their establishments would lead to lost business, lower revenues, a drop in the state's share of casino revenues and, ultimately, lost jobs.
That thought struck me immediately, too.
And he does reek of "shill."
The insanity continues unabated.
I suppose next they'll take away my right to chose what foods I eat because of the "obesity epidemic".
Well....I just saw on the local morning news...the usual bubble-headed bleached blonde announced with a smile that "New Jersey Has become the latest state to ban snoking everywhere, despite a last-minute lawsuit brought about by bar and restaurant owners, and other business in the hospitality industry."
Not one word about the casinos being exempt. Or that that was the reason the lawsuit was brought about. Not one. I'd be willing to bet that no one outside of New Jersey, other than people here, even knows that casinos are exempt.
And I remember when New York City went smoke free. The business owner's in Jersey were SO happy!! They yelled over to NYC 'HURRY TO OUR SIDE HURRY TO OUR SIDE!"
Meaning, that the New Yorkers could come to Jersey and still smoke.
NOW look at what the idiot lawmakers have done. Sickening!
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 00:10:56 -0000
Subject: [ohiosmokersrights] OHIO Opponents of smoking ban offer alternative
OHIO Opponents of smoking ban offer alternative
Proposal includes list of exceptions
Source: Toledo (OH) Blade, 2006-04-08
Author: BLADE COLUMBUS BUREAU
Intro:
Seeking to stamp out a ballot question that would enact a statewide
ban on smoking in nearly all indoor public places, a coalition of
bars, restaurants, and other businesses yesterday launched plans to
put their alternative before voters.
The coalition submitted proposed language for a constitutional
amendment to Attorney General Jim Petro, a necessary step before
asking more than 320,000 registered voters to sign petitions to place
the proposed amendment on the ballot. The proposal would exempt from
the ban bars, restaurants with separate smoking areas, bowling alleys,
bingo parlors, adult establishments, racetracks, tobacco retail
establishments, specially designated smoking rooms in hotels and
nursing homes, and any private residence or facility not open to the
public.
It would also override smoking bans enacted in 21 communities in the
state, including Toledo.
"Our coalition has conducted several polls that show that when offered
a choice between a total ban and a measure that contains common-sense
exemptions, the majority of Ohioans support a reasonable smoking
policy," said Jacob Evans of the Ohio Licensed Beverage Association.
A near-total ban on smoking in enclosed public places proposed by
SmokeFreeOhio does not involve a constitutional amendment.
I'll agree 100% with that. The Grinning Idiot is the absolute worst guv EVER in this state, regardless of party affiliation. And the reason the business owners have to do this is because the worthless RHINO legislature refused to do anything other than sit with their thumbs up their ass & say 'it should go to a fair vote by the people'-along with the seven million dollars earmarked by the Nazis to sway fence-sitters.
"The Grinning Idiot"
Wow, that's the best description of him I've ever heard.
Good thing I wasn't drinking coffee. My wife's computer would be ruined.
I've called the liberal, tax-loving, elitist country club scumbag that from day one. Never voted for him, proud to say. He never had me fooled.
Happy Easter!
I don't know whether I should laugh or cry over that.............
But you reminded me - I forgot to buy Peeps to go in my daughter's Easter basket - YIKES!!!!!!!!
I thought the Peeps website was very funny.
I just sent it to a couple of friends and my two daughters as an Easter Greeting.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.