Skip to comments.
Efforts to secure US borders 'have slowed since 9/11'
MSNBC ^
| April 11, 2006
| Christopher Swann
Posted on 04/11/2006 1:15:55 PM PDT by Marine Inspector
The growth in the number of agents patrolling US borders has slowed in the 4½ years since the September 11 terrorist attacks and concerns over illegal immigration override fears of terrorist infiltration in the allocation of border resources, according to a new analysis
(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alien; aliens; borderlist; bordersecurity; canada; cbp; dhs; illegal; mexicoborderpatrol; terorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-114 next last
To: investigateworld
Increased border security is the best thing for a smuggler.
61
posted on
04/11/2006 1:58:26 PM PDT
by
Marine Inspector
(Government is not the solution to our problem; Government is the problem)
To: NormsRevenge
I think it is my typing isn't the best. Is that a peronal attack Norm? Per Admin, I will clean up, but it would be nice if you tried to.
62
posted on
04/11/2006 1:59:35 PM PDT
by
jrooney
(borders)
To: jrooney
You are the one who made it personal and offered you knew about me from postings on other sites. Your utterance and mistake, not mine.
To: jrooney
Thanks for the link. It doesn't change the fact that the BP grew faster under the Clinton Admin then the Bush Admin.
I'm no Clinton fan, but the fact is, bush is doing the least amount possible to secure the borders.
Those of us that work the border know the reality of the situation.
64
posted on
04/11/2006 2:02:23 PM PDT
by
Marine Inspector
(Government is not the solution to our problem; Government is the problem)
To: Marine Inspector
I see. I'm not involved with border patrol, just the ports of entry, and we've grown considerably.
They've announced a rather ambitious hiring plan for the Border Patrol, but getting qualified applicants is another matter.
65
posted on
04/11/2006 2:02:28 PM PDT
by
Not A Snowbird
(Official RKBA Landscaper and Arborist, Duchess of Green Leafy Things)
To: All
Apprehension in FY 1999 = 1,537,000
Apprehension in FY 2000 = 1,643,679 (a 7% increase from the previous year)
Apprehension in FY 2001 = 1,235,717 (a 25% decrease from the previous year)
Apprehension in FY 2002 = 929,809 (a 25% decrease from the previous year)
Apprehension in FY 2003 = 905,065 (a 3% decrease from the previous year)
Apprehension in FY 2004 = 1,139,2820 (a 26% increase from the previous year)
Apprehension in FY 2005 = 1,171,268 (a 3% increase from the previous year)
In the first quarter of FY 2006, we've already had a 9% increase.
It will get worst, before it gets better.
66
posted on
04/11/2006 2:04:43 PM PDT
by
Marine Inspector
(Government is not the solution to our problem; Government is the problem)
To: SandyInSeattle
I'm not involved with border patrol, just the ports of entry, and we've grown considerably. You must be getting all our officers, we're shrink down here. LOL.
67
posted on
04/11/2006 2:05:55 PM PDT
by
Marine Inspector
(Government is not the solution to our problem; Government is the problem)
To: SandyInSeattle
but getting qualified applicants is another matter. Agreed.
They have lowered the standard for CBP Officers. God knows what we will be getting in the future.
68
posted on
04/11/2006 2:07:08 PM PDT
by
Marine Inspector
(Government is not the solution to our problem; Government is the problem)
To: Marine Inspector
"Increased border security is the best thing for a smuggler."
True, just wondering what's going on in the San Diego/TJ sector. Are amateurs getting into the act?
69
posted on
04/11/2006 2:07:48 PM PDT
by
investigateworld
(Abortion stops a beating heart)
To: Marine Inspector
I can agree we could do allot more, yet this president has done more to protect us than Clinton ever did. Clinton allowed Al Qaeda to flourish under his watch and attack us repeatedly with only a dove response.
We are fighting a costly war in Iraq that had to be done, now that we have proven with the Iraqi documents translation that Saddam was recruiting SUICIDE ATTACKERS from his AIR FORCE to attack US interests 6 months before 9/11. A coincidence? I personally do not think so. There will be allot more that will come out that will point to some sort of link to Saddam and 9/11.
70
posted on
04/11/2006 2:08:33 PM PDT
by
jrooney
(borders)
To: investigateworld
Everyone is getting into the act. The cartels are trying to gain control, but human smuggling is still a free market enterprise.
71
posted on
04/11/2006 2:09:09 PM PDT
by
Marine Inspector
(Government is not the solution to our problem; Government is the problem)
To: SandyInSeattle
They must be doing a good job as we don't have a "Canadian" speaking phone prompt yet. :-)
72
posted on
04/11/2006 2:10:35 PM PDT
by
mcshot
(From the Mid West border area where Canadians cross the border just to play golf.)
To: jrooney
this president has done more to protect us than Clinton ever did. I never said he didn't.
But, you can't fight a war and leave the back door open at the same time.
My problem with Bush, is he's a socialist not a conservative.
73
posted on
04/11/2006 2:11:06 PM PDT
by
Marine Inspector
(Government is not the solution to our problem; Government is the problem)
To: jrooney
Well, you are back. That has to be the shortest ban in the history of the world.
In any case, the ground rules are no ad hominems and bring proof.
Welcome to FR.
74
posted on
04/11/2006 2:13:20 PM PDT
by
Killborn
(Pres. Bush isn't Pres. Reagan. Then again, Pres. Regan isn't Pres. Washington. God bless them all.)
To: Marine Inspector
I agree you can not fight a war and keep your back door open. We need to solve this in a fashion that secures our borders without alienationg the hispanic vote that has been trending to the GOP.
I disagree Bush is a socialist. Hillary is a socialist.
75
posted on
04/11/2006 2:13:51 PM PDT
by
jrooney
(borders)
To: Killborn
I do not know where you thoguht I was banned. I was not. Nice shot across the bow that was headed.
76
posted on
04/11/2006 2:14:59 PM PDT
by
jrooney
(borders)
To: Marine Inspector
The policicos allowed this to happen, to worsen, and to become a crisis. Then they said "we have a crisis, got to solve it". Use of the word "crisis" allows politicos to pass laws that we don't like.
Since absolutely nothing was done about the problem for years, the government bears responsibility.
I'm not worried about Mexicans coming into the USA to work. They are good Christian people with good family values.
I'm worried about extremists of another religion who would go into Mexico, pick up some Mexican-type clothes and sneak into the USA. People whose idea of family values is to sing for joy over children blowing themselves up to kill Christians and Jews.
If someone sneaks in and commits a terrorist act, the politicos have the responsibility.
77
posted on
04/11/2006 2:15:03 PM PDT
by
BooksForTheRight.com
(what have you done today to fight terrorism/leftism (same thing!))
To: Killborn
I mean heeded. Thank you for your welcome.
78
posted on
04/11/2006 2:17:08 PM PDT
by
jrooney
(borders)
To: mcshot
79
posted on
04/11/2006 2:17:09 PM PDT
by
Not A Snowbird
(Official RKBA Landscaper and Arborist, Duchess of Green Leafy Things)
To: Travis McGee; Borax Queen; Czar; pbrown; Marine Inspector
80
posted on
04/11/2006 2:19:16 PM PDT
by
nicmarlo
(Bush is the Best President Ever. Rah. Rah.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-114 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson