Posted on 04/10/2006 7:27:53 AM PDT by AZRepublican
Check out what the DemocRATs are passing out!
You do realize that a good part of world terrorism, not all(probably), but a part, is being used to promote Globalism.. Thats what this is all about.. There are traitors in all soverign countrys.. promoting globalism. or bring the masses to the point they will support it.. and to blurr all nationalistic lines of demarkation(borders)...
If George Bush is NOT a Globalist, I would like some PROOF to the contrary.. Because, like his Daddy, and Bill Clinton too, he appears to float Globalist agendas, or what appears to be, at every opportunity..
Republicans SEEM to be oblivious.. drooling crossed eyed oblivious..
bump
I always counter that if election fraud were eliminated, the Republicans would have at least a 7 or 8 per cent advantage.
#####
Same for "polls".
Ed Gillespie, chairman of the Republican Party, said recently that Bush couldn't have beaten Kerry without the Hispanic vote. So, officially, the Republican party is now more interested in pandering to illegals and their supporters than it is to representing the sovereign interests of the United States of America and its legal, taxpaying citizens. We know where the Democrats stand. What are the options now for citizens who are seeing both political parties, for the purpose of political expediency, condone law breaking and the violation of America's sovereign rights to secure borders?
The illegal AND legal insurgents have one agenda(s).. Our offical leaders have another agenda.. GLOBALISM.. One world government (eventually).. Not all at once but long term.. but as short term as they can make it.. URP is already on board..
Used to think this "globalism" was conspiratorial nonsense in past years(U.S. wise).. Could NEVER happen here in the U.S. I thought.. How could it?..
I have re-assessed that.. By massive invasion by insurgents.. thats how.. An invasion of people that could care less about national borders.. How to stop them from VOTING?... you can't.. ID checks on 20,000,000 will not be happening.. Americas sovereignty is leaking out daily thru BIG holes.. Take 20,000,00+ and add to that all the illegals that WERE MADE legal in the past(now legal citizens and/or their kids).. the count rises sharply.. add to that sympathizers..
Is George Bush against all this?..
Only IF you think Dubya is STUPID.. He is NOT stupid..
This is being done ON PURPOSE.. Republicans had better get a clue or America is done..
Not by democrats but by republicans.. Pure genius this plan is.. brilliant but extremely maleficient.. Republicans better CLEAN UP their OWN party.. With no perimeter the political war is lost..
"The democratic party can't withhold its glee and is SALIVATING at the prospect of MILLIONS of future democratic voters."
Peter King is the best thing to happen to NY politics in a long time. Naturally, he will get bashed and vilified for his position on illegal immigration.
I just wish he was from my district so I could vote for him.
The first element?
Islam, a Religion of Peace®? ( links, blogs, quips, quotes, aggravating pictures ) is located here- click the Pic, and scroll backwards:
The other, somewhat interlocking element is this one:
"Thunder on the Border," click the picture:
Note, and note well--that the infamous"Mexican Flag Superior, American in Distress" is in the upper left corner...
Take a look, and follow all the links at #1158-1155.
What is happening under the radar is that the alien lobby, certain elements of radical Islam, and some on the Left share common goals, tactics, and exploitations of our system and society.
Not a conspiracy, but rather a "coming together on common points."
You have hit the nail on the head. Both the democrats and the unions have 'hit the motherlode' when it comes to the Hispanic vote. Somehow, someday, most the the illegals WILL be citizens, and it IS a gold mine for the democrats and they sycophant unions.
You have hit the nail on the head. Both the democrats and the unions have 'hit the motherlode' when it comes to the Hispanic vote. Somehow, someday, most of the illegals WILL become citizens (as the democratic party will MAKE SURE this occurs), and this WILL BE a gold mine for the democrats and their sycophant unions.
You are correct--as this does not bode well for the Republican Party in the future.
A counter protest sign idea:
"Basta!
Vaheémonos!"
Rough translation - "Shut up! Get out!"
Unfortunately the name Texaco is already taken.
Support our Minutemen Patriots!
Be Ever Vigilant!
I can't blame this on Commissioner Spero, or her predecessor. She's only been in an acting capacity for a few months awaiting a permanent commissioner, and this problem has been YEARS in the making. It predates Homeland Security, but somehow we were supposed to just snap our fingers and Bammo! Problem solved.
Typical day in my world. :-)
Have fun, and be careful out there!
Who is financing these marches? The Democratic party?
BellStar posted this on the Texas board... worth repeating:
Jimmy Carter AGAIN
"Undocumented" Criminals
When President Jimmy Carter took office in 1977, he appointed immigrant "rights" activist Leonel J. Castillo to head the INS. Castillo adopted the grotesque euphemism "undocumented workers" as the official INS designation for illegal immigrants. In an address to the Border Patrol Academy in June 1977, Castillo described border guards as "the front-line soldiers in President Carter's war against human rights violators. Possibly no other government agency has a greater opportunity to demonstrate to the world our concern for human rights than those of us in the immigration service."
In April 1977, President Carter announced that his vision of "human rights" would require some variety of general amnesty for illegal immigrants. In August of that same year he submitted to Congress a framework for immigration reform which included various forms of amnesty for illegal aliens, as well as penalties for employers who knowingly hired illegals and a modest increase in funding for the INS and Border Patrol. When those proposals were rejected by Congress, Carter assembled a commission headed by Reverend Theodore Hesburgh with a mandate to create another framework for immigration reform.
In May 1981, the Hesburgh Commission issued its "findings," which essentially regurgitated the Carter Administration's rejected proposals: A general amnesty for illegal aliens, coupled with employer sanctions and a modest increase in funding for border enforcement. These recommendations were incorporated into the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA), which was sold to an anxious American public as a definitive "solution" to the crisis of illegal immigration. Alas, like so many other "solutions" urged upon us by the ruling Establishment, the IRCA exacerbated the problem it was supposedly intended to fix.
On May 5, 1987, the INS opened 107 "legalization centers" across the country to begin granting amnesty to millions of illegal aliens residing here. Under the provisions of the IRCA, illegal aliens who could demonstrate continuous residence in the U.S. since January 1, 1982 had one year to apply for legal resident status, and were eligible for citizenship within five years. This was an unforgivable affront to law-abiding Americans, including immigrants who had patiently undergone the trying process of acquiring legal citizenship. It was also an act of capitulation which emboldened millions of others to violate our borders in anticipation of similar amnesties in the future.
Among the INS agents who helped implement the IRCA's amnesty provisions was William King, a former chief of the Border Patrol and the first director of the Border Patrol Academy. "IRCA was supposed to be a three-legged stool," King recalled to THE NEW AMERICAN. "A lot of us who had served in the Border Patrol weren't happy with amnesty, but we thought it might be a good trade-off in exchange for employer sanctions and border enhancement."
However, observes King, the only tangible result of the IRCA has been a pool of "several hundred thousand people who have broken our laws who now have green cards and are becoming eligible for citizenship. And once they do, they can begin the process of 'chain immigration' by bringing in their relatives."
Not surprising.
Why else would the AFL-CIO be supporting these people?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.