1 posted on
04/09/2006 7:04:09 PM PDT by
blam
To: blam
I swear by wine and dark chocolate!
2 posted on
04/09/2006 7:07:06 PM PDT by
nuconvert
([there's a lot of bad people in the pistachio business])
To: blam
Since alcohol is helping as well, chocolate is best to be administered in the form of brandy-filled pralines. Say, "cognac" flavor from Finnish manufacturer Panda Oy.
5 posted on
04/09/2006 7:15:35 PM PDT by
GSlob
To: blam; Clemenza; Do not dub me shapka broham; rmlew; Yehuda; nutmeg; firebrand
The good news: I am Sardinian on my mother's side.
The bad news: I don't drink that much wine.
![](http://members.aol.com/polis1/pics/patosm.gif)
9 posted on
04/09/2006 7:30:24 PM PDT by
Cacique
(quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
To: blam
Okay. I can deal with this. My medication of choice is Dove Dark. I call it my "Death By" chocolate. I'm good...
10 posted on
04/09/2006 7:35:23 PM PDT by
redhead
(Don't mess with me...I'm pre-El Nino -- Mother Nature)
To: blam
I am a cocoavore and I approve this message.
To: MoJo2001
16 posted on
04/09/2006 8:21:33 PM PDT by
BIGLOOK
(Order of Battle: Sink or capture as Prize, MS Media)
To: blam
I believe that Woody Allen predicted something similar to this in his movie "Sleeper" back in 1973. The script about a Rip Van Winkle character goes:
"HAS HE ASKED
FOR ANYTHING SPECIAL ?
YES, THIS MORNING
FOR BREAKFAST.
HE REQUESTED SOMETHING
CALLED WHEAT GERM,
ORGANIC HONEY
AND TIGER'S MILK.
[ Laughs ]
OH, YES. THOSE WERE
THE CHARMED SUBSTANCES...
THAT SOME YEARS AGO
WERE FELT TO CONTAIN
LIFE-PRESERVING PROPERTIES.
YOU MEAN
THERE WAS NO DEEP FAT ?
NO STEAK OR CREAM PIES
OR HOT FUDGE ?
THOSE WERE THOUGHT
TO BE UNHEALTHY,
PRECISELY THE OPPOSITE
OF WHAT WE NOW KNOW TO BE TRUE.
Woody got the fudge right! Who knows about the rest?
17 posted on
04/09/2006 8:53:11 PM PDT by
lfod1776
To: MoJo2001; Kathy in Alaska
Can't sleep...saw this...lol!! MoJo, if this is true, you are one healthy lady!
21 posted on
04/23/2006 10:06:28 PM PDT by
GummyIII
To: Diana in Wisconsin
24 posted on
04/24/2006 9:07:48 PM PDT by
FreeKeys
(Support Denmark: Buy Legos -- and TUBORG and CARLSBERG BEER!)
To: blam
Manufacturers need to lower the sugar content. This may result in a product that is not popular with a lot of current chocoholics Low sugar chocolate is an acquired taste. I've never seen it (in the USA) made with both sugar and artificial sweeteners, and I don't know why, because both aspartame and sucralose (Splenda) would be excellent for that purpose.
To: blam
My heart is fine but I'll volunteer for the study.
26 posted on
04/24/2006 9:13:24 PM PDT by
TASMANIANRED
(The Internet is the samizdat of liberty..)
To: blam
It's health food.
![](http://mxi.myvoffice.com/images/usertemplates/DefaultTheme/en_mxi/img_boxes_bottle.jpg)
45 posted on
04/25/2006 9:01:38 AM PDT by
evets
(S.o.a.P)
To: blam
I love dark, bittersweet chocolate.
47 posted on
04/25/2006 9:19:18 AM PDT by
LIConFem
(A fronte praecipitium, a tergo lupi.)
To: blam
Hmmm...a nice Chianti with some cocoa beans? :o)
72 posted on
04/29/2006 8:33:45 AM PDT by
arasina
(So there.)
To: Gabz
104 posted on
04/29/2006 2:43:03 PM PDT by
freepatriot32
(Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
To: Coleus
108 posted on
05/01/2006 10:39:56 AM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson