There IS a problem with global warming... it stopped in 1998

The Sunday Telegraph (UK) ^ | April 9, 2006 | by Bob Carter

[Grampa Dave]

My wife and I are laughed at as probably the only couple in Cali land from the early 1970's to the present, who have never smoked dope.

[Ma3lst0rm]

I suppose that is what gets to me the most about the whole debate, if that is what it can be called. It has such a degree of political importance to the left because it fits nicely with their desire to redistribute wealth and to tear down capitalism and economic freedom in favor of Marxist goals. I believe that the worst thing that could possibly happen to the human race is the acceptance of an ideology that would produce a rigid static conservation model of society.


The inability to accept the fact that mankind is just as much a natural and essential part of the goings-on on this planet is in my opinion a clear sign of psychosis on the part of these activist scientists and the left. They claim to be realists and many are avowed atheists but based on their rhetoric one can hardly distinguish them from other classes of true believers; the only real difference is they practice a rather extreme nature religion where man and the things man do are defined as "evil".

You are right about public schools. That is one reason why I home school. I also encourage my children to ask questions and use reason and logic to arrive at conclusions. What the public schools seem to encourage is empty-headed acceptance of environmentalist propaganda. Personally I think NEA members should be banned from working in public schools until they drop all political affiliations with the left or right.

[InABunkerUnderSF]

So, what our universities are graduating are not scientists in the historic sense but monks of the Green Chruch?

[Para-Ord.45]

ping

[aculeus]

Boortz picked up this Carter story the day after (cough) an alert Freeper posted it.



http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1610550/posts

[BILL_C]

What the public schools seem to encourage is empty-headed acceptance of environmentalist propaganda


The PUBLIC SCHOOLS seem to encourage empt-headed accepttance of MANY other things too including, well the list is too long and I'd get ill writing it.

[monkeyshine]

Indeed. And what caused it to be this warm 150 years ago? Wagons with too many horses?

[RipSawyer]

Pole Shift.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

An excellent name for a gay rock group.

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"Indeed. And what caused it to be this warm 150 years ago? Wagons with too many horses?"

See post #33.

[FreedomPoster]

Boortz has had it in for Carter for a long time. This is A Good Thing^tm.

Nice work there.

[Seadog Bytes]

You saw this? ...WOW! Good stuff.

[Sam Cree]

Isn't that IPCC study the one where a good many of the scientists who worked on it circulated a petition complaining that the conclusions were not supported by the research?

[Seadog Bytes]

"The World of Man-Made

Global Warming Supporters

is in A Serious State"

CONTENTS

Is man-made global warming proved? In the Beginning Global Warming, Colonialism and the ICE Kyoto Case Closed? Green Myths  ....................................... Turncoats The causes of climate change Hidden Motives Now On View Why is the ABD entering the GW Debate? What Next?

They say... "There's a consensus that man-made global warming is real" "Carbon Dioxide Levels are Unprecedented" "Polar Ice is Melting due to Global Warming" "Mankind is Pouring CO2 into the Atmosphere" "Temperatures are now Hotter than since Records Began" "Sea Levels are Rising due to Global Warming" "Extreme Weather is Caused by Global Warming" "Alternative Energy Sources are Viable" "Species are Disappearing due to Global Warming" "Computer Climate Models are Trustworthy"

Is man-made global warming proved?
 
The answer is a resounding 'no'. There is no convincing scientific evidence for man-made global warming outside of computer models, which do not agree with actual climate data. There is, however, overwhelming evidence to show that temperature increases precede carbon dioxide rises, so carbon dioxide levels cannot be a cause of global warming and any steps taken to reduce emissions are futile.
 
Computer models as used for generating future scenarios have been unable to reproduce actual climate patterns, and are unreliable in the extreme. As the following chart shows, these GCMs, an abbreviation which has been translated as general circulation models or global climate models, predict uniform warming of the lower levels of the atmosphere as a result of man's emission of greenhouse gases, chiefly carbon dioxide, actually a minor greenhouse gas. This man-made warming is predicted to be particularly marked in the last 25 to 30 years, yet actual measurements from satellites and radiosonde balloons show no warming, but slight cooling instead.

Continues at:  http://www.abd.org.uk/climate_change_truths.htm

   

(Please FReepmail if you want on, or off, this list.   I certainly have no desire to increase anyone’s stress-level. Thanks!!!)

[Calpernia]

bttt

[Seadog Bytes]

Thanks. Looks like the Canadians and Brits are starting to 'get' it. Maybe, if we're lucky, that will eventually happen here as well.

[Alamo-Girl]

Thanks for the ping!

[Seadog Bytes]

Yes Ma'am.

[Cindy]

Thank you for the ping SeaDog Bytes.

Well now, it's spring where I live;
and I say...THANK GOD FOR GLOBAL
WARMING.

Prediction: No more snow until next winter.

[T. Buzzard Trueblood]

Bump.

[Watery Tart]

Mornin', Seadog! Thanks for the ping!

Allow me to share MY pic of Hans Blix:

Obviously, he's admonishing Arianna for taking a d@mned SUV to the airport:

But she had her marching orders! Algore needed to take another private jet to Kyoto RIGHT NOW !!:

Oops! Sorry! Let me post a different view of Algore needing to take another private jet to Kyoto RIGHT NOW :