Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: aculeus

Isn't that IPCC study the one where a good many of the scientists who worked on it circulated a petition complaining that the conclusions were not supported by the research?


52 posted on 04/09/2006 2:56:45 PM PDT by Sam Cree (Delicacy, precision, force)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sam Cree
Isn't that IPCC study the one where a good many of the scientists who worked on it circulated a petition complaining that the conclusions were not supported by the research?

Not sure.

61 posted on 04/10/2006 5:16:30 AM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Cree
"Isn't that IPCC study the one where a good many of the scientists who worked on it circulated a petition complaining that the conclusions were not supported by the research?"

A Major Deception on Global Warming, Wall Street Journal, June 12, 1996

snip....

"In my more than 60 years as a member of the American scientific community, including service as president of both the National Academy of Sciences and the American Physical Society, I have never witnessed a more disturbing corruption of the peer-review process than the events that led to this IPCC report.
-- Dr. Fredrick Seitz

94 posted on 04/11/2006 7:17:36 AM PDT by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson