Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Threatens Veto of Spending Bills
AP & Washington Post ^ | 4/7/6 | Andrew Taylor

Posted on 04/07/2006 7:51:24 PM PDT by Crackingham

President Bush said Friday he would use his power to veto spending bills if Congress does not cut the federal budget as he has asked. In over five years in office, Bush has never vetoed any bill. But he said that restraining spending was crucial to cutting the deficit in half by 2009 as he has promised. "If necessary, I will enforce spending restraint through the exercise of the veto," the president said.

Bush's brief statement from the White House's Diplomatic Reception Room came a day after feuds among rival Republican factions led House GOP leaders to pull a $2.8 trillion budget blueprint from the floor. The collapse of the measure threatens to send Republicans into the fall election season with deficits on the rise and no plan in place to contain them. Separate talks aimed at extending Bush's previously passed tax cuts for capital gains and dividends stalled. With lawmakers headed home for a two-week recess with few accomplishments to show constituents, the president said Congress must break the logjam.

"Our economy grows when the American people make the decisions about how to save, spend and invest their money," he said. "To keep our economy creating jobs and opportunity, Congress needs to show its trust in the American people and make the tax relief permanent."

Bush took on those, mostly Democrats, who oppose the extension of some of those tax cuts, saying the lower rates have helped create 5.1 million new jobs since August 2003. "The facts have proven the critics wrong 5.1 million times over," he said.

The budget measure's demise was the result of opposition among moderates and a power struggle between a faction of conservatives and the House Appropriations Committee. Republican unity was essential to passing the plan, since no Democrats were expected to back it.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; budget; bush; congress; federalbudget; federalspending; notfoolinganyone; spending; taxcuts; taxes; yeahright
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: H. Paul Pressler IV

Yes! After creating the largest entitlement that will cost future generations trillions in unfunded liability, signing every pork bill to come his way, and spending like a drunken sailor he's going for fiscal restraint now. Sure. Typical - a day late and a dollar short. I should apologize to drunken sailors -- at least it's THEIR MONEY they're spending!


61 posted on 04/07/2006 9:58:57 PM PDT by T.L.Sink (stopew)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Hank Rearden
Isn't it great? The picturelickers must be wetting themselves.

I too have noticed a distinct shift on this forum over the past two years. It's been more pronounced since the illegals started protesting though.

I think the party is going to have more trouble motivating the rank and filers the next year than they think. 

62 posted on 04/07/2006 10:02:50 PM PDT by zeugma (Anybody who says XP is more secure than OS X or Linux has been licking toads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

LOL. He's losing his base so he may have to resort to spending constraint. Unreal what it takes.


63 posted on 04/07/2006 10:05:25 PM PDT by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nonstatist; All
From his flailing, and the futility of his gestures, I am beginning to think that Bush is becoming a PINO.

President In Name Only.

Cheers!

64 posted on 04/07/2006 10:07:52 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Don't pat him on the back just yet... ther are a few things to keep in mind:

1- Bush likes to spend money

2 - He has never used his Veto power (even when he should have).

3 - Threats are just that until the turn to action.


65 posted on 04/07/2006 10:21:59 PM PDT by TheBattman (Islam (and liberalism)- the cult of Satan and a Cancer on Society)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #66 Removed by Moderator

To: Crackingham

*Gasping for air*

Maybe the funniest FR thread ever! :-)


67 posted on 04/07/2006 10:29:47 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (www.usbordersecurity.org - Open borders, in the age of terror, are criminal negligence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
"If necessary, I will enforce spending restraint through the exercise of the veto," the president said.

"And if that doesn't work, I'm going to put them on double-secret probation!", he added.

68 posted on 04/07/2006 10:35:15 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (www.usbordersecurity.org - Open borders, in the age of terror, are criminal negligence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

"The Republicans are in control of the government"
69 posted on 04/07/2006 10:55:51 PM PDT by RHINO369
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: BARLF; All
Bush signed the Pentagon spending bill with the McCain anti-torture provision included despite months of veto threats. See one activist group's reaction here.
70 posted on 04/07/2006 11:15:51 PM PDT by newzjunkey (Fellow 50th Congressional Freepers: Don't fall for Bilbray!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: jec41
Given what you say, it makes Bush even more toothless if he doesn't veto that 1/3 of discretionary spending.
71 posted on 04/07/2006 11:19:57 PM PDT by newzjunkey (Fellow 50th Congressional Freepers: Don't fall for Bilbray!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

Never have I seen so many posters here on FR so down on Bush. It's his own damned fault.


72 posted on 04/07/2006 11:21:04 PM PDT by jwh_Denver (I'm going postal on these freaking liberals insanities.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

I wonder if he's afraid the veto pen was used on Ms Lewinsky? I'm sure they can find him a new pen!


73 posted on 04/07/2006 11:22:01 PM PDT by newzjunkey (Fellow 50th Congressional Freepers: Don't fall for Bilbray!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: jwh_Denver
It's his own damned fault.

EXACTLY. It isn't us, it's him and his policies. His "compassionate conservatism" has been too long on "compassion" and only rhetorical nonsense on the "conservative" part.

74 posted on 04/07/2006 11:23:56 PM PDT by newzjunkey (Fellow 50th Congressional Freepers: Don't fall for Bilbray!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

The big rubber stamp on his desk that says "NO" has long dried out and is proceeding to crumble into little bits.


75 posted on 04/07/2006 11:26:27 PM PDT by The Red Zone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
Bush Threatens Veto of Spending Bills

Checking the sky for flying pigs.

76 posted on 04/07/2006 11:28:23 PM PDT by Euro-American Scum (A poverty-stricken middle class must be a disarmed middle class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Siena Dreaming
Has he said before he would veto a spending bill?

Sure, when there wasn't enough spending in it.

77 posted on 04/07/2006 11:28:30 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

Threatened a Veto?
Is this part of the Friday silliness thread?


78 posted on 04/07/2006 11:32:40 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Happy 150th Birthday Kerrville!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker
But a number of the folks on this board and in conservative circles that feigned outrage that the *first* time he threatens a VETO was over Dubai

Looks like you are right.

Freepers were lying about the Dubai veto threat.

79 posted on 04/08/2006 7:22:04 AM PDT by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

I love this President and all he's done to protect America but he's endorsed spending like a drunken sailor! These vetos are too late but better late than never I guess.


80 posted on 04/08/2006 7:25:07 AM PDT by Lucky2 (Islam = the religion of satan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson