Skip to comments.
Transgender person sues, alleging job harassment
Sacramento Bee ^
| 4/4/6
| Herbert A. Sample
Posted on 04/04/2006 7:52:50 AM PDT by SmithL
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
1
posted on
04/04/2006 7:52:52 AM PDT
by
SmithL
To: SmithL
2
posted on
04/04/2006 7:54:23 AM PDT
by
pissant
To: SmithL
Consequences, freak. Consequences.
3
posted on
04/04/2006 7:56:29 AM PDT
by
L98Fiero
(I'm worth a million in prizes.)
To: SmithL
"Ryan, 44, contends that for much of last year, co-workers bumped into her or made derogatory comments."
Not enough info... Derogatory comments? Does that mean they still talked to her/him like a man or that they shouted obscenities?
and "bumped into" ... violence at work is serious but it would take a lot of bumping before I would bitch about it.
In any case, work harrassment should be judged on universal standards with no special rights for orientation or cross dressing.
4
posted on
04/04/2006 7:56:50 AM PDT
by
gondramB
(Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's and unto God that which is God's.)
To: SmithL
Only a mentally ill person could think HE could walk into work wearing womens' clothing and not have it disturb and disrupt everyone else. There is no right to create a disruptive work environment, or to force acceptance of severe mental illness as normal.
5
posted on
04/04/2006 7:57:44 AM PDT
by
thoughtomator
(Since all politicians understand is money, I donate ONLY to those who oppose illegal immigration)
To: SmithL
Danny must have made his gay boss mad when he told him he as going to be a lesbian now.
San Francisco loves these freaks, sound like an inter-office love triagle. Danny-Boss-Danielle
To: SmithL
It's outrageous that Californians are now required to accept freaks in the workplace.
To: SmithL
Trans her/his ass to the street.
8
posted on
04/04/2006 7:58:53 AM PDT
by
boomop1
(there you go again)
To: SmithL
Transgender ?!?!?!? It's a wacked (pun intended) amputee dang it !........:o)
9
posted on
04/04/2006 7:58:53 AM PDT
by
Squantos
(Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
To: SmithL
Unless he lopped off his pecker he's just a cross-dresser.
AFAIK, that's not a protected minority.
Yet...
10
posted on
04/04/2006 8:00:29 AM PDT
by
Triggerhippie
(Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.)
To: L98Fiero
Consequences, freak. Consequences. Elimination or avoidance of the consequences of choices is the very bedrock foundation principle of the "progressive" philosophy.
11
posted on
04/04/2006 8:00:50 AM PDT
by
TChris
("Wake up, 55fAmerica. This is serious." - Ben Stein)
To: SmithL
Ryan, 44, contends that for much of last year, co-workers bumped into her or made derogatory comments. Poor fella...someone tells him that it looked as if he put his makeup on in the dark and he falls to pieces.
My 10 year old niece is made of sterner stuff than him.
To: pissant
Transgender is an unusual thing. It must be so difficult to do what they are doing, and the stigma that goes along with it. However, they're their own worst enemy. I watched the first and only episode of THE SURREAL LIFE yesterday. It was on at my gym. Talk about nutcases of all sexual persuasions! But there was one transgender, happens to be someone named Alexis Arquette (from the David/Rosanna/Patricia clan). OBVIOUSLY the black sheep of the family. He/she is transgender. Of all the nuts on that show, he/she was the most articulate and brightest. I was thinking that his/her presence on the show could be a real boost for their cause. However, he showed his true colors in a scene, I guess they were drinking and someone said something he/she didn't like and it was ugly. The stereotypical insane rantings of someone with a mental illness. And there is the rub. Underneath all the makeup, it's a mental illness, not a physical one.
13
posted on
04/04/2006 8:02:48 AM PDT
by
Hildy
To: SmithL
Fancy and new.......
14
posted on
04/04/2006 8:04:10 AM PDT
by
Vaquero
("An armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
To: lady lawyer
Unfortunately, it WILL be coming SOON to all the other states!
15
posted on
04/04/2006 8:06:56 AM PDT
by
texson66
("Tyranny is yielding to the lust of the governing." - Lord Moulton)
To: thoughtomator
This is a case about a work environment.
A few months ago, there was a story from NJ about a trans freak who is a school teacher. Elementary school.
He became she, and that was just too bad for those children, the school board said so!
Bill O'Reilly had a parent of two students of that school on his show. The father said that he was going to have to pull his kids out because they were so confused.
The evil homosex/feminism agenda must be stopped. They seek to be above everyone else, and to rule by this kind of intimidation.
16
posted on
04/04/2006 8:07:18 AM PDT
by
ishabibble
(UNITED WE STAND DIVIDED WE FALL)
To: SmithL
Hmmm, Ryan
Here's a Ryan with OEM parts. No comparison..
Maybe Danielle should telecommute.
17
posted on
04/04/2006 8:08:48 AM PDT
by
Nomorjer Kinov
(If the opposite of "pro" is "con" , what is the opposite of progress?)
To: SmithL
Has she applied at Ringling Brothers?
They still have a freaks side show, don't they?
18
posted on
04/04/2006 8:12:50 AM PDT
by
Beckwith
(The liberal media has picked sides and they've sided with the Jihadists.)
To: SmithL
Sounds as if this shim needs to get to get a set, not lose one.
To: Hildy
I actually knew one that was a downright pleasant "gal". LOL But I'm all for it if they end up looking like Caroline Cossey
And not like this...LOL
20
posted on
04/04/2006 8:14:20 AM PDT
by
pissant
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson