Posted on 04/03/2006 8:13:43 AM PDT by doug from upland
ROHRBACHER DEMANDING NEW PROBE OF OKC
Jayna Davis and I had an interesting phone conversation this morning. She is still waiting for a plane ticket to D.C. and an invitation to testify about the OKC bombing. Neither has been forthcoming.
Is it good news that Rep. Dana Rohrbacher (R-CA) is demanding a new probe of the OKC bombing? Maybe. But is it going to really get to the truth about the Middle Eastern connection to OKC? Maybe not.
Last year, David Schippers, famous for prosecuting both the Chicago mob and William Jefferson Blythe Clinton, flew to OKC to meet Jayna and her witnesses. Dave spent 12 hours grilling 14 of them on camera.
When he was finished, he told Jayna that, with just three of them, he would get a federal indictment of Hussain al-Hussaini in one day. FBI agent Dan Vogel told her he could do the same -- with one of her witnesses. That is how credible they were.
So why, Congressman Rohrbacher, did you tell Jayna that the committee has no budget to fly her to Washington, D.C.? What is the problem? Are we finally going to get the truth or is this grandstanding?
Andreas Carl Strassmeier has six witnesses saying that he was building a fence at the time of the bombing. He couldn't have been with McVeigh. Of 1100 fingerprints tied to the crime scene, none are Strassmeier's. Not one of 30,000 witnesses ties Strassmeier to the crime.
Here is a question for you, Congressman. Well, actually seven questions. Ten months ago, Jayna gave these to you in writing and still is waiting for the answers.
1. Why has the Justice Department/FBI not issued an official on-the-record statement exonerating Hussain Al-Hussaini of complicity in the Oklahoma City bombing? Has the DOJ provided Congress with Hussain Al-Hussaini’s whereabouts for the critical hours of the morning of April 19, 1995?
2. Why did the FBI never question Hussain Al-Hussaini about the bombing?
3. Why did the FBI previously suspect Al-Hussaini’s employer of ties to the Palestinian Liberation Organization?
4. Why were the original motel registration logs where witnesses testified McVeigh checked in with Al-Hussaini’s Iraqi cohort the evening of April 18, 1995, never returned to the establishment’s owner?
5. Whatever happened to the brown Chevrolet pickup that was seen carrying Middle Eastern suspects from the bomb site? The Oklahoma City police found fingerprints inside the recovered truck. Why were these prints not compared to the immigration files of the three Middle Eastern nationals whom witnesses observed in that getaway vehicle before, during, and after the bombing?
6. Why did the Bureau rebuff my efforts to surrender the witness statements and supporting evidence in September 1997? Why did the FBI withhold from the defense teams the twenty-two witness affidavits that I delivered to FBI Special Agent Dan Vogel in January 1999?
7. Why were the prior warnings issued by the Congressional Task Force on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare that predicted an Islamic attack in the “heart of the U.S.” disregarded as an indicator of foreign participation?
Congressman Rohrbacher needs to bring Jayna and Schippers to meet with the committee in closed session. The committee needs to see the on camera interviews of 14 eye witnesses. It needs to be done in closed session to protect the witnesses. They stepped forward as patriots facing great risk.
The real story of OKC should have been told long ago. Let's finally get it told now. Bill Clinton did not want to deal with Middle East terror on our soil. He wanted this to be domestic terror. That is what he got. Who are those deep inside the FBI who are responsible for continuing the coverup?
The truth about OKC will forever end any remaining legacy of the impeached William Jefferson Blythe Clinton. Had he dealt with OKC, 9-11 could have been prevented. He ignored Middle East terror, created the vast right wing conspiracy, and his Kool-Aid drinkers dug in their heels. He would be held accountable for nothing. They stood with him no matter what because they had to fight the dreaded right wing. That is how Clinton divided America as never before.
If anyone would like to join me in calling the congressman, he is at (202) 225-2415.
Again more nonsense, sam. My statement was an accurate explanation of how, and why, certain things are done in certain ways in Congressional committee investigations. The people who brought in John Dean really did believe him to be a credible witness, and, you'll note, the press dutifully reported it that way. Whether or not YOU assign -any- credibility to this is simply irrelevant.
Vic Mordecai has a org in Israel that monitors Arabic and Farsi broadcasts. Says the Arabs are the biggest double-dealing phonies you can imagine. Will say one thing in Eng. for the benefit of all the suckers out there who want to sing cumbyah, but in Arabic are calling for the destruction of Israel and the U.S. (even so-called "moderates") in most unflattering terms (we are commonly refered to as "apes", "swine", "monkeys", etc. in the Arab press). The press in the ME (mostly gov controlled) is behind ginning up riots in these countries. Iranians openly boasting about nuking Israel.
LOL!!
I'd answer you....Cuz I'd be so impressed that a Texan knew the word.
(vbg)
FRegards,
On Yousef's laptop (maybe an Outlook file) seized in Cebu City says that he met with a "Nick" on such and such a day.
Yes, we are very much being played the fools in the ME. But what do I know, I am just a monkey?
About Yousef and his meeting with Nick--why do you suppose that whole incident with the e-mail, Nick Berg and Moussaui connection was brushed off as mere coincidence and the normally rabid media just let it go as such? I mean, c'mom!
I need to buy some more Reynolds Wrap. Yikes.
Bump the thread
I don't know about Nick Berg, but I think the "Nick" Yousef was referring to was Terry Nichols.
You're probably right. But I am still curious about the Nick Berg connection--and of course in OKC on top of it.
Well, of course, I pronounced it in Texanese - "Bodark."
Having been on the receiving end of an Osage Orange fight or two in childhood, "them horse apples" are not something one forgets!
LOL!!
Agreed.....
"The Tulsa World got ahold of the memo ..."
That's why. The lib paper in the state, which has nothing to lose because it's in Tulsa, not OKC - the actual bombing site with its name attached forever in infamy - doesn't mind expending its energies trying to track down anything that might lead back to a Pubbie somewhere being at fault, as in Bush41.
The O'homan OTOH, bless their hearts, won't expend any energy at all doing anything. They just don't. Ever. Some of the letters to Dear Abby make them cringe; they're that "conservative" in the "to the right of Attila the Hun" sense.
So am I, but my mind's a little more open. Maybe with a sho-nuff oil boom back on, they'll kick up their heels a bit, as in the old days, and go back to snooping around. But don't count on it. As long as the Baptists and Muslims peacefully co-exist in the community, which they have for a long time - and I won't say out loud why that is - everyone can eat falafel and hummus and no one's sensibilities are upset.
Thanks doug... a lot of us are digging for our old links (the dispatcher calls, stills and video of the area... etc.), to consolidate and refresh the timeline as it was during that time.
Did anyone send this to Tony Snow or Rush?
BTTT
Ok. You win. I'll just stop trying to understand why you guys can't get any traction. You obviously don't think you need any help.
Bump the thread.
Please send it.
While I understand the root of your position (Tulsa World = lib, DOK = extreme conservative), this seems more accurate historically than it is currently. I have noted considerable liberalizing since Christy took over after the passing of her father, including on the editorial page.
I think the reason they don't pursue this is journalistic laziness and conservatism in the sense of seeking to maintain the status quo. In addition, they don't want to be seen as the latest iteration of the "grassy knoll" group, at least in their own mind.
Agreed.
"The TRUTH is out there" ping to myself.
I must provide one correction, however. "Patels" are NOT Middle Eastern. They are Indian; It is true that "Patel" is as common among Indians as "Smith" is among English ancestry folks.
It is also a fact that Indians have taken over the motel trade in this country.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.