Again more nonsense, sam. My statement was an accurate explanation of how, and why, certain things are done in certain ways in Congressional committee investigations. The people who brought in John Dean really did believe him to be a credible witness, and, you'll note, the press dutifully reported it that way. Whether or not YOU assign -any- credibility to this is simply irrelevant.
Bump the thread
Ok. You win. I'll just stop trying to understand why you guys can't get any traction. You obviously don't think you need any help.