Posted on 04/03/2006 8:13:43 AM PDT by doug from upland
ROHRBACHER DEMANDING NEW PROBE OF OKC
Jayna Davis and I had an interesting phone conversation this morning. She is still waiting for a plane ticket to D.C. and an invitation to testify about the OKC bombing. Neither has been forthcoming.
Is it good news that Rep. Dana Rohrbacher (R-CA) is demanding a new probe of the OKC bombing? Maybe. But is it going to really get to the truth about the Middle Eastern connection to OKC? Maybe not.
Last year, David Schippers, famous for prosecuting both the Chicago mob and William Jefferson Blythe Clinton, flew to OKC to meet Jayna and her witnesses. Dave spent 12 hours grilling 14 of them on camera.
When he was finished, he told Jayna that, with just three of them, he would get a federal indictment of Hussain al-Hussaini in one day. FBI agent Dan Vogel told her he could do the same -- with one of her witnesses. That is how credible they were.
So why, Congressman Rohrbacher, did you tell Jayna that the committee has no budget to fly her to Washington, D.C.? What is the problem? Are we finally going to get the truth or is this grandstanding?
Andreas Carl Strassmeier has six witnesses saying that he was building a fence at the time of the bombing. He couldn't have been with McVeigh. Of 1100 fingerprints tied to the crime scene, none are Strassmeier's. Not one of 30,000 witnesses ties Strassmeier to the crime.
Here is a question for you, Congressman. Well, actually seven questions. Ten months ago, Jayna gave these to you in writing and still is waiting for the answers.
1. Why has the Justice Department/FBI not issued an official on-the-record statement exonerating Hussain Al-Hussaini of complicity in the Oklahoma City bombing? Has the DOJ provided Congress with Hussain Al-Hussaini’s whereabouts for the critical hours of the morning of April 19, 1995?
2. Why did the FBI never question Hussain Al-Hussaini about the bombing?
3. Why did the FBI previously suspect Al-Hussaini’s employer of ties to the Palestinian Liberation Organization?
4. Why were the original motel registration logs where witnesses testified McVeigh checked in with Al-Hussaini’s Iraqi cohort the evening of April 18, 1995, never returned to the establishment’s owner?
5. Whatever happened to the brown Chevrolet pickup that was seen carrying Middle Eastern suspects from the bomb site? The Oklahoma City police found fingerprints inside the recovered truck. Why were these prints not compared to the immigration files of the three Middle Eastern nationals whom witnesses observed in that getaway vehicle before, during, and after the bombing?
6. Why did the Bureau rebuff my efforts to surrender the witness statements and supporting evidence in September 1997? Why did the FBI withhold from the defense teams the twenty-two witness affidavits that I delivered to FBI Special Agent Dan Vogel in January 1999?
7. Why were the prior warnings issued by the Congressional Task Force on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare that predicted an Islamic attack in the “heart of the U.S.” disregarded as an indicator of foreign participation?
Congressman Rohrbacher needs to bring Jayna and Schippers to meet with the committee in closed session. The committee needs to see the on camera interviews of 14 eye witnesses. It needs to be done in closed session to protect the witnesses. They stepped forward as patriots facing great risk.
The real story of OKC should have been told long ago. Let's finally get it told now. Bill Clinton did not want to deal with Middle East terror on our soil. He wanted this to be domestic terror. That is what he got. Who are those deep inside the FBI who are responsible for continuing the coverup?
The truth about OKC will forever end any remaining legacy of the impeached William Jefferson Blythe Clinton. Had he dealt with OKC, 9-11 could have been prevented. He ignored Middle East terror, created the vast right wing conspiracy, and his Kool-Aid drinkers dug in their heels. He would be held accountable for nothing. They stood with him no matter what because they had to fight the dreaded right wing. That is how Clinton divided America as never before.
If anyone would like to join me in calling the congressman, he is at (202) 225-2415.
In answer to your question:
Jayna Davis (Author of "The Third Terrorist") needs help. She received the following e-mail:
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 3:56 AM
Subject: Release of captured documents
>I imagine you've taken a look at the documents
> captured by the US military which were released
> yesterday by the Office of Joint Reserve Intelligence
> Center.
> > I've read a few, but there's one that might
> particularly interest you--the last one on the list,
> dated 2000 and titled "Various Administrative
> Documents and Questions, AFGP-2002-801138". It's sort
> of a grab-bag of information, but contains a bunch of
> questions alQaeda members asked their leaders,
> apparently before September 11, 2001. > > On the 43rd page, it reads:
> > "Q8- We hear about the Oklahoma explosion and that it
> is the largest explosion in America. Is it the one
> planned by Ramzi Yousef or not? (TC: This question
> was circled and marked with two (X) marks."
> > http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/products-docex.htm#iraq
> > There may be many more fascinating tidbits buried in
> these documents, but this would seem to reinforce what
> you've been saying for so long.
> > Thanks for your careful research, and happy digging!
OK. Shortly after Jayna received this e-mail, the document was pulled from that site. But it can still be found at the following site:
http://www.ctc.usma.edu/aq_harmonylist.asp
Scroll down to:
Various Admin Documents and Questions
AFGP-2002-801138
Click on that link and go to the English link and find page 43 on the scroll bar (not page 43 of the document). You will find the following question:
"Q8-We hear about the Oklahoma explosion and that it is the largest explosion in America. Is it the one planned by Ramzi Yousef or not? (TC: This question was circled and marked with two (x) marks."
You will notice that the English translation is 57 pages long. You will then go to the Arabic link (right next to the English link). That link is 332 pages long so there must have been some heavy redaction because 332 pages of Arabic became 57 pages of English translation. Print off or go to page 191 of that part.
You will see the following in the middle of possibly a heavily redacted page:
Question
Ref.Oklahoma
Bombing, if
Done By Yousef
Ramzi-
EMPHASIZE
AFGP-2002-801138-007-0179
Please try to find out as much as you can about these documents before they are pulled. If anyone knows Arabic, (or knows someone who does), please go to the pages near the page 191 and see if you can find anything in Arabic that would be helpful. We need to do this before the document is pulled from this website.
Thanks Freepers
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1598689/posts?page=110#110
Hmmmmm, she must have a "BAKE" sale, raise her own funds and see if they will let her in behind the secret doors.
Brilliant, thanks.. I'm bumping this for later read/research.
The smoke had not cleared before they were on TV furiously backpedalling and apologising to Arab-Americans everywhere.
I particularly found that to be odd, considering that no arrests had been made, no evidence examined, and in fact, rescue and recovery operations were far from complete.
How could they "know" that Arabs were not involved?
Jayna, drop by if you have a few minutes.
They didn't want Arabs involved. They wanted Rush Limbaugh's audience to be implecated. Keeping the White House in 1996 was more important than the truth because Clinton might have had to do something about it. Clinton was all talk. case in point; The Iraqi Liberation Act of 1998.
Until 1998, BJ Clinton believed that domestic terror was our greatest threat. If anyone can find the source, I think I remember only about five full-time FBI agents being assigned to Islamic terror. Could that be possible?
I haven't read his book but I've heard that Richard Clarke thought that there was a lot more that should have been looked into in OKC.
bttt
If there is more to investigate, then why hasn't the Bush Administration taken any action to open this up? Why was Timothy McVeigh executed so quickly under the Bush Administration? Why, when all of the discussion of the Gorelick Wall emerged during the 9/11 hearings, didn't the Bush Administration publicly announce the reopening of questionably terrorist acts against Americans during the 1990s?
What am I missing here? What benefit would the Bush Administration have by hushing this up?
I'll chip in a dollar or two.
I have been asking those questions for several years. There is not a good answer. Bush could end Hillary now. Why isn't he doing it? It seems that there are people inside the FBI who are protecting themselves. They would be holdovers from the Clinton era.
Going there to translate right now...
For Clinton's political future, it had to be domestic terror. He used it to divide us.
Well, you just cut to the heart of the matter. Truth. Ignoring it won't change it. Ignoring the Truth can and will subvert and prevent Justice.
Why would anyone in the FBI, the CIA, or the government want to subvert or prevent justice? I'm not totally sure I want to know the answer to that...
I don't know how to do that.
I don't know.
For several years they sang his song…he was a hero to their cause
In denial many lived…he placed himself up above the laws
He knew all of the right things to say…down through…hell and then back believers would go
In eight long years he's done to us…more damage than you know
For his neglect we would finally pay the price…the count's three thousand dead
We know just where to place the blame…it is on Bill Clinton's head
When the Cole was hit and brave men died…there is no doubt that he hadn't cried
He looked at his polls and sighed
Now this is the end…this is the end…of his legacy
At OKC he saw his chance…he needed to divide us all
He would create the vast right wing…and his mind-numbed fools would pick up the ball
So we'd fight among ourselves…and the…grand scheme had worked, he got his way
With our attention diverted he…would gut the CIA
For his neglect we would pay the price…the count's three thousand dead
We know just where to place the blame…it is on Bill Clinton's head
When the Cole was hit and brave men died…there is no doubt that he hadn't cried
He looked at his polls and sighed
Now this is the end…this is the end…of his legacy
We endured a psychopath…who saw himself as the Rockstar Prez
We had sent the warnings out…watch what this man does, not what he says
For neglect we paid the price…when those great buildings fell with many dead
And we know just where to place the blame…it's on Bill Clinton's head
When the Cole was hit and brave men died…there is no doubt that he hadn't cried
He looked at his polls and sighed
Now this is the end…this is the end…of his legacy
Moreover, I'm PERFECTLY WILLING to accept that there was someone else involved, but I do not think less of my peers in Okahoma City and Denver, where there have been two grand juries and two petite juries and in all four of these cases, there has been no evidence that anyone but McVeigh and Nichols were the culprits. So I'm real hesistant to claim all these people are part of a "coverup."
I don't know how either! Who can we ask? Maybe the mods can help?
It's such an important issue -- I want as many activist freepers as possible to help.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.