Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Pushes Congress to OK Immigrants
AP on Yahoo ^ | 3/30/06 | Nedra Pickler - ap

Posted on 03/30/2006 6:00:20 PM PST by NormsRevenge

CANCUN, Mexico - With Mexican President Vicente Fox at his side, President Bush gave Congress a long-distance push Thursday to open the United States to immigrant workers who have been sneaking across the borders to fill low-paying jobs.

"We don't want people sneaking into our country that are going to do jobs that Americans won't do," Bush said at the end of a private meeting with Fox, where the issue was on top of the agenda. "We want them coming in in an orderly way, which will take pressure off both our borders."

The meeting between the Mexican and U.S. leaders came on the first day of a two-day North American summit that also includes Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Harper, meeting with Bush for the first time since taking office two months ago with the promise of building stronger ties with Washington, said the two countries are moving past their "tension" over Iraq.

Still, he took a combative stance on their long-standing dispute over U.S. tariffs on Canadian softwood lumber, saying Canada would "pursue all its legal options" if he and Bush can't work out an agreement.

But it was the immigration debate, which has dominated the U.S. Senate this week, that took center stage in talks conducted in a beachfront resort surrounded by bikini-clad spring breakers. A new immigration law could affect as many as 6 million Mexicans living illegally in the United States — about half of all those who are estimated to have sneaked in from other countries seeking new opportunities they can't find at home.

Bush is pushing for a guest worker program that would let foreigners in low-paying jobs stay temporarily, which Fox says is a good first step toward some form of legal status for all Mexican illegal immigrants.

The issue has united the two leaders, whose friendship dates back to Bush's time as Texas governor but was strained over Fox's objections to the war in Iraq. But immigration has divided Bush's Republican party, with business interests who want cheap labor battling conservatives who want a get-tough policy against illegal immigrants.

Fox suggested the issue is largely out of their hands now.

"The matter is in the Congress of the United States and that is where the decision will be made," Fox said. "It is no longer between President Bush and President Fox."

But both leaders were clearly trying to sway the debate.

"I told the president there is a legislative process that's going forward," Bush said. "And that it may look cumbersome to some, but that's how our democracy works."

Bush added, "I'm optimistic that we can get a bill done."

The summit included plenty of time to be neighborly. The three leaders dressed casually in open-collared shirts and strolled together among the ancient Mayan ruins at Chichen Itza before sitting down for more intense one-on-one meetings. Fox planned a lavish dinner for his guests.

After spending the morning sightseeing, Bush had a few hours off before the formal meetings began. He used part of the time to work up a sweat in his hotel's gym.

There was tight security despite the fun-loving atmosphere generated by college students who have flocked to Cancun for spring break. Gunboats patrolled the turquoise waters off Bush's spa resort, and fencing kept out all but hotel guests. "I'd like to make sure you work more than you play," Bush joked to reporters.

The trilateral meeting was expected to be Fox's last, since he is set to leave office this year because of term limits. Bush lauded Fox for stabilizing the Mexican economy and improving the net worth of his people.

"That's important for the American economy as well," Bush said. "The more net worth there is in Mexico, the more likely it is the Mexican may be wanting to buy a U.S. product. And vice versa, by the way."

In his meeting with Harper, Bush sought to make the newly elected leader look good at home, making it a point to stress how hard the Canadian leader had pressed him on the softwood lumber issue. Harper "made an emphatic case," Bush said.

"I appreciate his steely resolve to get something done," the president said. "I appreciate your pushing."

But Bush didn't give Harper much of substance, saying only that "my intent is to negotiate in good faith and a timely fashion to resolve this issue."

___

On the Net:

U.S. Trade Representative: http://www.ustr.gov

White House: http://www.whitehouse.gov


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Government; Mexico; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; 1986redux; amnesty; bush; bushamnesty; bushrobusteza; congress; guestworkers; hr4437; illegalimmigration; illegals; immigrantlist; immigrants; intifada; jorgewarbusto; mexico; mexifornia; nwo; pushes; redandgreendawn; threeamigos; tresamigos
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 1,521-1,530 next last
To: Dolphy


LOL! Exactly! I believe you, regardless. Same guy, I'm sure.


561 posted on 03/30/2006 8:50:29 PM PST by onyx (Elections are in November, 06 ---- 08 can wait!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 552 | View Replies]

To: rcocean
Why should someone who cuts in line be rewarded?

Cheap labor. When you are a lawbreaker, you dont have as much say when it comes to how much you are paid.

562 posted on 03/30/2006 8:50:52 PM PST by MaineVoter2002 (http://jednet207.tripod.com/PoliticalLinks.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 550 | View Replies]

To: MaineVoter2002

We probably have 30 million here now. I heard Durbin say that half of all illegals were overstayed visas. I had previously thought the number was 20 to 30 million just from border crossers.

Amnesty will gives us another 100 million illegals within 10 years, but then they won't be called illegal anymore.

Game over....Democrats will have their voting block for decades.


563 posted on 03/30/2006 8:50:57 PM PST by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 445 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper
If only those shouting for impeachment had a clue what implications that would bring

Not that I'm for or against impeachment, it makes no difference to me as I support neither facet of the one party system, but out of curiousity what 'implications' would that bring?

564 posted on 03/30/2006 8:51:01 PM PST by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 539 | View Replies]

To: onyx
I prefer working from WITHIN, with a seat at the table.

Well next time you're talking to President Bush, please be sure to remind him to secure our borders. Thanks.

566 posted on 03/30/2006 8:51:54 PM PST by Junior_G
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 542 | View Replies]

Comment #567 Removed by Moderator

To: onyx
I prefer working from WITHIN, with a seat at the table.

At the Taco Bell.

568 posted on 03/30/2006 8:52:12 PM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 542 | View Replies]

To: trubluolyguy

Nice try, but that's not the quote.

A seat at the table is always preferred.

Losers and winners.

I know which one you are. I can tell by your constant whine.


570 posted on 03/30/2006 8:52:13 PM PST by onyx (Elections are in November, 06 ---- 08 can wait!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 551 | View Replies]

To: yarddog
I don't guess I think you are an idiot but you are a mean spirited person with no debating skills at all.

Are you under the impression that you're the type of person who I give a rat's A$$ what you think of me? If so, you're sadly mistaken and have too high opinion of yourself.

You think hurling an insult is making a point.

I suggest your review your own posts.

Goodness what we have to put up with.

You can always leave the forum.

571 posted on 03/30/2006 8:52:14 PM PST by Howlin ("It doesn't have a policy. It doesn't need to have a policy. What's the point of a Democratic policy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 528 | View Replies]

To: yarddog
You know I voted for Bush twice because I was sick of the Clinton cabal. I knew he wasn't the best man but there was always hope.

If you had any principles you wouldn't be jumping ship to some irrelevant third party that hasn't produced a single candidate in Washington ever since Perot arrived on the scene.

Third parties are a waste of time. Voting Democrat is against principle.

572 posted on 03/30/2006 8:52:54 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 555 | View Replies]

To: All

'08 Bumper Sticker

"ANYBODY except a RINO or hitlery!"




Sessions and Tancredo '08

http://sessions.senate.gov/
http://tancredo.house.gov/

Monday, March 27, 2006
http://sessions.senate.gov/pressapp/record.cfm?id=253171&&

“The American people are counting on us to secure our borders and restore the rule of law to our immigration system. The Senate Judiciary Committee today let the American people down by passing out a blanket amnesty bill. We've been down this path several times before, and it proved a failure.
“There was a real opportunity to take the steps necessary to fix our failed immigration enforcement system and while progress was made, we did not get there. The proper approach is to first fix the enforcement system and then to undertake a national discussion about immigration, considering how to justly handle those here illegally and what rules should govern future immigration levels. We also have not effectively dealt with the national security issues.

“I voted against the committee passed legislation because it rewards illegal behavior, will be considered amnesty by the people and will not restore respect for law. Fortunately, the House of Representatives has passed a solid bill, and there will be an opportunity to improve the Senate version in the days to come.”




http://tancredo.house.gov/irc/welcome.htm

"In the first place we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the man's becoming in very fact an American, and nothing but an American...There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag, and this excludes the red flag, which symbolizes all wars against liberty and civilization, just as much as it excludes any foreign flag of a nation to which we are hostile...We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language...and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people."

Theodore Roosevelt 1907




Real Conservatives FINALLY
have a winning ticket in '08




Time for the real conservatives on FR,
be it Republicans, Independents or Democrats
(like Zell Miller and John O'Neill) to band together
and oust the looney left and RINO's


The "Politically Correct RINO's" on FR are the same group
who "swore"
klintoon, hitlery, hanoi kerry, sanbdi ber(bur)glar, al bore, jane beno,
would be prosecuted for
pardongate, chinagate, the bribes in upstate NY in the 2000 NY Senate race, waco, etc, etc,
"when" the "time was right".


573 posted on 03/30/2006 8:53:10 PM PST by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub (It's ALWAYS a great day to be a Conservative Independent Voter AND a Viet Nam Vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Junior_G

I would tell him exactly that. In the meantime, have you called or written to your Congresscritters? And to POTUS as well?


574 posted on 03/30/2006 8:53:30 PM PST by onyx (Elections are in November, 06 ---- 08 can wait!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 566 | View Replies]

To: AZ_Cowboy

Pat's been a TV commentator for the last 6 years.

He has about as much power as Chris Matthews.

And I like Pat - but by running as a Reform canidate, he lost him any support he had in the Republican Party in DC.

Of course, many on FR as so consumed with hatred of Pat, they can't stop writing about him.


575 posted on 03/30/2006 8:53:35 PM PST by rcocean (Copyright is theft and loved by Hollywood socialists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 534 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Just say not no but hell no.


577 posted on 03/30/2006 8:54:11 PM PST by OKIEDOC (There's nothing like hearing someone say thank you for your help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

No thanks. I am eddykated and don;t need fast food employment anymore.


578 posted on 03/30/2006 8:54:12 PM PST by onyx (Elections are in November, 06 ---- 08 can wait!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 568 | View Replies]

Comment #579 Removed by Moderator

To: onyx
It's vicious lie and I think you agree.

I don't know about that, it was around 3:00 a.m., my b.s. detector was not totally functional. I guess I should haven't let the cats wake me up that night. They're so persistent.

;-)

There are more than a small number of fantasies on that Coast to Coast show.

580 posted on 03/30/2006 8:54:31 PM PST by beyond the sea (Claire De Lune - ........ 1862)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 529 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 1,521-1,530 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson