Posted on 03/29/2006 4:53:31 AM PST by Valin
WASHINGTON: Eyeing House and Senate elections this fall, Democrats are stepping up their effort to cut into the public perception that Republicans are stronger on national security.
Congressional Democrats vow to provide U.S. agents with the resources to hunt down Osama bin Laden and ensure a "responsible redeployment of U.S. forces" from Iraq in 2006 in a national security policy statement House and Senate Democratic leaders were announcing Wednesday.
"We need a new direction on national security, and leaders with policies that are tough and smart. That is what Democrats offer," Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said in remarks prepared for delivery Wednesday.
His counterpart in the House, Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said Democrats were offering a fresh strategy _ "one that is strong and smart, which understands the challenges America faces in a post 9/11 world, and one that demonstrates that Democrats are the party of real national security."
Republicans criticized the statement as an election-year stunt.
The statement lacks specific details of a plan to capture bin Laden, the al-Qaida chief who has evaded U.S. forces in the more than four years since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. But Democrats suggest they will double the number of special forces and add more spies to increase the chances of finding al-Qaida's elusive leader.
Democrats also do not set a deadline for when all of the 132,000 American troops now in Iraq should be withdrawn.
They say: "We will ensure 2006 is a year of significant transition to full Iraqi sovereignty, with the Iraqis assuming primary responsibility for security and governing their country and with the responsible redeployment of U.S. forces."
The latest in a series of party policy statements for 2006, the Democrats' national security platform comes seven months before voters decide who will control the House and Senate.
Bush's job approval ratings are in the mid- to high-30s, and Democrats consistently have about a 10 percentage point lead over Republicans when people are asked who they want to see in control of Congress.
With the public skeptical of the Iraq war and Republicans and Democrats alike questioning Bush's war policies, Democrats aim to force Republicans to distance themselves from the president on Iraq and national security or rubber-stamp what Democrats contend is a failed policy.
Democratic strategists say their polling shows Democrats leading in all other areas _ such as the economy, health care, education and retirement security _ and having closed a gap in polls with Republicans on national security.
Republicans characterized the Democrats' platform as tough election- year talk that isn't backed up by the party's record.
"This is more of the same from the party that opposes this president's effort to keep our country safe," said Tracey Schmitt, a Republican National Committee spokeswoman. "The bottom line is while this president campaigns against the terrorists, Democrats remain focused on campaigning against this president."
Overall, the Democratic position paper covers party policy positions on homeland security, the war on terror, the military, Iraq and energy security. However, it contains many of the same proposals Democrats have offered over the past year.
For months, House and Senate Democrats have tried to craft a comprehensive position on national security, but they have splintered, primarily over Iraq.
Republicans have sought to use that division to their own political advantage, claiming that Democrats simply attack the president and his fellow Republicans without presenting proposals of their own.
:-D Thanks! Always good to start off the morning with a chuckle.
Isn't that too bad for the al-Qaida constituency. I thought for sure they wanted deadlines.
They can say it all they want, but because of who they are, it's just not believable.
They sound like junior high students!
If the rat thinks saying they will: surrender in Iraq, stop wire taping terrorists, give rights to terrorists prisoners and find UBL will make the nation want to put them in charge they really are dumber than they look.
You're exactly right, dems always seem to use the word "smart" when they refer to themselves (limo liberal arrogance). I remember how often Kerry & Co used that word in 04, to no avail. This reminds me of the Wendy's ad back in the early 80's, "WHERE'S THE BEEF?"
It sounds like "Me too... Me too... Me Too!!! I'm tough on terror too! We can do it better... don't ask how, but we will tell you after you elect us to office!"
Lurch ver 2.1!!! dim L O S E R S ! ! ! ! !
LLS
They've hired a room full of marketing consultants to help them formulate their "Real Security" (TM) brand.
"We're good enough, we're smart enough, and gosh darn it people like us."
Idiots.
L
Bush's job approval ratings are in the mid- to high-30s, and Democrats consistently have about a 10 percentage point lead over Republicans when people are asked who they want to see in control of Congress.
crAP polls. dream on.
No doubt a little of both. By equating the entire War on Terror to just one man, Harry hopes to declare success and move on.
Clinton refused to accept him, he was sent to Afghanistan--where he put together the mess that President Bush is now left to clean up!
WHY DOESN'T THE MEDIA REMIND EVERYONE OF THIS?? (rhetorical question)
Always glad to be of service. :-)
If you tried to build a house with a "plan" like that, you would be arrested for cruelty if you put your dog in it.
and don't forget amnesty for illegals
Democrats now do national security? Before or after they hold a rally? These folks are lost in the weeds. But is good for a laugher.
Cue John F'n Kerry and his "I have a plan" speech.
They are also using the Robert F. Kennedy phrase "we can do it better".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.