Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld did not know of documents!!
CNN News Conference | 03-28-06

Posted on 03/28/2006 10:20:43 AM PST by navysealdad

Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld in a news conference today said he did not know that documents have been released that showed

Russia provided intelligence to Iraq's government on U.S. military movements in the opening days of the U.S.-led invasion in 2003.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: prewardocs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
To: navysealdad

I think he is feigning ignorance/buying time while it gets sorted out.

I don't think we should trust the Russians or the Chinese as far as we can throw them.....

And, if we are going to TRUST, then we better do a lot better job at the VERIFY.


21 posted on 03/28/2006 10:33:10 AM PST by redgirlinabluestate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuffsenuff; Pukin Dog
I agree with nuffsenuff. I just watched the Rumsfeld press conference and the reporters were all over this, asking questions about why he didn't know about this (which I think is because NO ONE HAD TRANSLATED THE DOCUMENTS WHICH IS WHY THEY WERE RELEASED). It was pretty funny, because a week ago these reporters didn't care two cents about these documents, but now, NOW that they think they have a chance to "get" Runsfeld, they are all over this story.

I will bet they are hiring Arabic translators out of their own pockets so that they can find out all the juicy details.

ONly, of course, those details won't be what they want.

He also talked about the translations being done by hundreds of people who can cross-check with others, and that the public will be able to see for themselves.

Well done, Rummy!

22 posted on 03/28/2006 10:33:27 AM PST by Miss Marple (Lord, please look after Mozart Lover's and Jemian's sons and keep them strong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

"If one were to ask 'Did I know about that document?' then goodness no, I did not. Now if the question is "Do I now know about that document?" absolutely! Will I continue to know about the document? You bet!"


23 posted on 03/28/2006 10:33:43 AM PST by planetpatrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Liberty Valance

Thanks, LV. always fun to give folks a giggle.

"Toot, toot, tootsie, good-bye..."


24 posted on 03/28/2006 10:33:49 AM PST by RexBeach ("There is no substitute for victory." -Douglas MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Shaft; SittinYonder
"President"

Why would you put that in quotation marks?

25 posted on 03/28/2006 10:35:58 AM PST by eyespysomething
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: navysealdad; conserv13; gov_bean_ counter; Pukin Dog; nuffsenuff; Liberty Valance; Poincare; ...
Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld in a news conference today said he did not know that documents have been released that showed

That is ABSOLUTELY NOT WHAT HE SAID!

He said he didn't know if there was an INVESTIGATION into who might have leaked the information to Russia. He also said that he was CERTAIN that if it needed investigating, it was being done.

Period.

26 posted on 03/28/2006 10:36:05 AM PST by Howlin ("It doesn't have a policy. It doesn't need to have a policy. What's the point of a Democratic policy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

So basically, someone didn't hear what was said?


27 posted on 03/28/2006 10:37:09 AM PST by nuffsenuff (Don't get stuck on Stupid - General Russ Honore Sept 21, 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: eyespysomething; Miss Marple; Echo Talon

See #26, please.


28 posted on 03/28/2006 10:37:10 AM PST by Howlin ("It doesn't have a policy. It doesn't need to have a policy. What's the point of a Democratic policy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: navysealdad

What is he expected to say? Of course he's going to say that.


29 posted on 03/28/2006 10:37:41 AM PST by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuffsenuff

Or they are trying to "start something." :-)


30 posted on 03/28/2006 10:37:51 AM PST by Howlin ("It doesn't have a policy. It doesn't need to have a policy. What's the point of a Democratic policy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: navysealdad

LOL...right...must be a non event...'cause saddam was being feed disinfo by the Russians with Americas help. Mole=Cover story....never was a mole.........


31 posted on 03/28/2006 10:37:56 AM PST by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand; but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: navysealdad
AL-CNN reports. They have pictures too, but they're having trouble removing the "X's" over Donald Rumsfeld's face.
32 posted on 03/28/2006 10:38:03 AM PST by TheForceOfOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Thanks for the clarification, Howlin.


33 posted on 03/28/2006 10:38:43 AM PST by eyespysomething
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: PurpleMan

It's not you. What do people expect?


34 posted on 03/28/2006 10:38:43 AM PST by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Yep, he is exactly right. Read my tag line. Rummy does it again. Now, these dopes are going to highlight the documents, go out and hire translators to find out "what the administration didn't know", then they will either have to shut up, or release their findings.

Its brilliant!
35 posted on 03/28/2006 10:40:23 AM PST by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache, so if mere words can anger you, it means you can be controlled with little effort.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

He also said "NO ONE HAD TRANSLATED THE DOCUMENTS WHICH IS WHY THEY WERE RELEASED" if they hadn't been translated how would he know??!!!


36 posted on 03/28/2006 10:40:27 AM PST by navysealdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple; nuffsenuff
I agree with nuffsenuff.

I agree with nuffsenuff AND you, Miss Marple. Rumsfeld is nobody's fool. I believe he has a plan, he's initiating the plan, and the MSM is going to end up doing his work for him. LOL

37 posted on 03/28/2006 10:40:33 AM PST by Chena (I'm not young enough to know everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; navysealdad

Thanks, Howlin, for setting the record straight. This just proves once again (for the zillionth time) that anything reported on CNN cannot be trusted and FReepers that consider posting their garbage need to vet it for the truth prior to posting.


38 posted on 03/28/2006 10:41:36 AM PST by demkicker (democrats and terrorists are familiar bedfellows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Just to follow up, don't believe the administration didn't translate every damn one of those documents, looking forward to the media's attempts to mis-translate them. Remember the old saying: "Never ask a question, unless you know what the answer will be."
39 posted on 03/28/2006 10:42:06 AM PST by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache, so if mere words can anger you, it means you can be controlled with little effort.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: navysealdad
He also said "NO ONE HAD TRANSLATED THE DOCUMENTS WHICH IS WHY THEY WERE RELEASED" if they hadn't been translated how would he know??!!!

So, who didn't know they hadn't been translated? We ALL knew that.

But what you said he said is an outright lie.

He was asked about an INVESTIGATION; that's what he said he didn't know about.

Just what are you trying to do here?

And, BTW, Bush is the one who DEMANDED they be released, translated or not.

40 posted on 03/28/2006 10:42:30 AM PST by Howlin ("It doesn't have a policy. It doesn't need to have a policy. What's the point of a Democratic policy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson