Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Germans are brainiest (but at least we're smarter than the French)
London Times ^ | 3/27/2006 | Helen Nugent

Posted on 03/27/2006 3:53:04 PM PST by Neville72

BRITAIN and France have experienced long periods of conflict and rivalry but now victory in one area can be claimed: Britons are more intelligent than the French. A new European league of IQ scores has ranked the British in eighth place, well above the French, who were 19th. According to Richard Lynn of the University of Ulster, Britons have an average IQ of 100. The French scored 94. But it is not all good news. Top of the table were the Germans, with an IQ of 107. The British were also beaten by the Netherlands, Poland, Sweden, Italy, Austria and Switzerland.

Professor Lynn, who caused controversy last year by claiming that men were more intelligent than women by about five IQ points on average, said that populations in the colder, more challenging environments of Northern Europe had developed larger brains than those in warmer climates further south. The average brain size in Northern and Central Europe is 1,320cc and in southeast Europe it is 1,312cc. “The early human beings in northerly areas had to survive during cold winters when there were no plant foods and they were forced to hunt big game,” he said. “The main environmental influence on IQ is diet, and people in southeast Europe would have had less of the proteins, minerals and vitamins provided by meat which are essential for brain development.”

He added that differences in intelligence across Britain could be attributed to bright people moving to London over hundreds of years. Adults in England and Wales have an IQ of 100.5, higher than Ireland and Scotland, both with 97. People living in London and the South East average 102. “Once in the capital they have settled and reared children, and these children have inherited their high intelligence and transmitted it to further generations.”

The pattern is repeated in other countries, Professor Lynn claimed. In France, IQ scores in Paris were much higher than those in rural areas.

Professor Lynn has spent three decades analysing thousands of test results to scrutinise the role of evolution in IQ. He has published his findings in a new book. Britons excel in another area of Professor Lynn’s research. He found that university students had, at 109, the second-highest undergraduate IQs in the world, beaten only by their US counterparts on 110.

Professor Lynn ascribes the differences between British and French intelligence levels to the results of military conflict. He described it as “a hitherto unrecognised law of history” that “the side with the higher IQ normally wins, unless they are hugely outnumbered, as Germany was after 1942”.

A “normal” IQ ranges from 85 to 115 but exceptionally gifted people have scores starting at 145.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Germany; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: europe; iq
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: Savage Beast

Another neat comparison would be to stack up percentage of population living in urban areas with IQ.

In other words, city folks are smarter than country bumpkins.


21 posted on 03/27/2006 4:36:55 PM PST by Vicomte13 (Et alors?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Neville72

I see Turkey near the bottom. Is there an IQ survey of muslim countries?


22 posted on 03/27/2006 4:45:42 PM PST by gotribe (Just tired of going easy on islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neville72

As I keep telling my kids, "Attitude is everything."

Looking at this list, I'm convinced that China will eat all their lunches due to its work ethic and open-mindedness to others' ideas (to a fault).

By comparison, Europe's greatest flaws are its pridefulness and sloth.


23 posted on 03/27/2006 4:51:56 PM PST by RightOnTheLeftCoast (You're it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vicomte13
"In other words, city folks are smarter than country bumpkins."

Or more likely, vice versa.

24 posted on 03/27/2006 4:56:36 PM PST by Savage Beast (9/11 was never repeated--thanks to President George W. Bush and his surveillance program!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Neville72

The Geico Gekko is smarter than the French. And he neither speaks French, nor has forgotten he used to speak German.


25 posted on 03/27/2006 4:58:58 PM PST by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proudpapa
Intelligence without wisdom is practically/usually a vice.

A sentiment with which I concur.

26 posted on 03/27/2006 5:00:13 PM PST by Mr Ramsbotham (Bend over and think of England.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: PzLdr

"I mean, who doesn't want Free pie and chips? There's pie, and there's chips. For Free."

27 posted on 03/27/2006 5:04:41 PM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: To Hell With Poverty

Who was Alexander Bellski?


28 posted on 03/27/2006 5:06:41 PM PST by Paladin2 (If the political indictment's from Fitz, the jury always acquits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Neville72
Ok, here's a politically incorrect issue that has been bugging me recently. I hope no one takes it in the wrong way. Here it is:

Most people don't have a problem admitting that intelligence runs in families and most scientists agree that there is a strong hereditary component of intelligence. So based on that, why do we find it so disturbing/unacceptable that there may be significant differences in average intelligence between ethnic/racial subgroups that cannot be explained by environmental or cultural factors? Why do we find that so much more disturbing than the inherent, and widely acknowledged, inequity that nature imposes on individuals (i.e. some are smart and some are not, some are physically strong and some are not.) Personally, I would like to believe that there were no significant differences between various racial/ethnic subgroups but apriori I see no rational scientific reason to believe this is the case; I want to believe because it makes me feel comfortable. But what if this assumption is false? What are/will be the consequences? And what is the best way to handle it? Is it best just to ignore it and wait for latter generations to deal with it? Or will it just go away on its own?
29 posted on 03/27/2006 5:21:53 PM PST by Avenger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vicomte13

I'm willing to bet that Scotland is the brainiest of all of the UK countries, though I could be wrong.


30 posted on 03/27/2006 5:23:26 PM PST by Clemenza (I Just Wasn't Made for These Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.

I'm hiding this article from my Besserwisser (know-it-all) German wife. I'd never hear the end of it.


31 posted on 03/27/2006 5:47:16 PM PST by Jabba the Nutt (Jabba the Hutt's bigger, meaner, uglier brother.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: proudpapa
Bill Clinton is amazingly smart.

I have never seen a putative IQ score for slickWillie. When test scores have come out for brightboys like Kerry and Gore, they tend to have been rather embarrassing for the pundits of conventional wisdom. Clinton would not score well on standard subtests of intelligence which would include judgment, attention span, general information, immediate memory, probably math, and conversion of digital information to arbitrary novel symbols. He was very good at social perception and emotional intuitiveness, reading and manipulating people, which is why the media whores still love him. But lets face it, in 8 years he came up with not one new or creative idea, and accomplished nothing. Whoever coined the cliche "Talk's cheap" had some one very much like Billyboy in mind. He ended up sputtering in his SOTU about uniforms for schoolchildren.

Intelligence without wisdom is practically/usually a vice.

Yes, or at least a dangerous weapon.

32 posted on 03/27/2006 6:14:43 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Neville72; martin_fierro

"Ich bin ein Bigbrainer"


33 posted on 03/27/2006 6:31:54 PM PST by mikrofon (Niech zyje Polska)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Okay I'll bite - who?


34 posted on 03/27/2006 6:45:28 PM PST by To Hell With Poverty ("This is our Common and we're going to stay here until we leave!" - Random Boston Commie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: To Hell With Poverty

He was the first telephone pole. ;-)


35 posted on 03/27/2006 7:01:26 PM PST by Paladin2 (If the political indictment's from Fitz, the jury always acquits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Ooops,

That should'a been Alexander GRAHAM Bellski.


36 posted on 03/27/2006 7:02:43 PM PST by Paladin2 (If the political indictment's from Fitz, the jury always acquits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Ha ha, I got it anyway!!


37 posted on 03/27/2006 7:08:55 PM PST by To Hell With Poverty ("This is our Common and we're going to stay here until we leave!" - Random Boston Commie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza

I would've been willing to bet that the Scots were smartest too.

Unfortunately, being a pea-brained Frenchman, I was unable to comprehend that the article actually answered that question, and the answer was that the English are smartest, and the Welsh and Scots drag down the British average. It's actually right there in the text, but a stupid Frenchman has to read everything three times to perhaps understand it.


38 posted on 03/27/2006 7:36:17 PM PST by Vicomte13 (Et alors?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: To Hell With Poverty
Poland's number 3....who knew?

The Poles, mostly, and that's about it.

39 posted on 03/27/2006 7:37:50 PM PST by Petronski (I love Cyborg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Neville72; cyborg
Does cranial size really correspond to intelligence?

Because I wear an 8 3/8 ball cap...special made.

40 posted on 03/27/2006 7:42:35 PM PST by Petronski (I love Cyborg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson