Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

India to become 'open defecation free' by 2012 (Diversity Alert)
Daily India ^ | 3/27/06 | Mikey_1962

Posted on 03/27/2006 10:35:33 AM PST by Mikey_1962

New Delhi, March 26 (IANS) Come 2012 and it will be rare to see people defecating in the open in India. So claims Rural Development Minister Raghuvansh Prasad Singh, who went on to say that the country was set to achieve 'open-defecation free' status under the government's Total Sanitation Programme (TSC).

'Open defecation is slowly losing popularity in rural India, and the government is doing all efforts to end this for all by 2012,' Singh told IANS.

The TSC was started in 1999 by the rural development ministry to ensure sanitation facilities across the country.

'The growth in the use of toilets from 22 percent in 2001 to 38 percent of the population in 2006 (till February) is an encouraging sign. The government has raised the grant for construction of household toilets from Rs.625 to Rs.1,500.

'While the central government would now bear 70 percent of the expenditure as against 60 percent earlier, the rest will be shared by the state government and the family,' he said, on the sidelines of a campaign on the need to wash hands.

The minister pointed out other issues related to defecation.

'In Haryana and Punjab people are not poor, what they lack is awareness. They have trucks, tractors and four-wheelers but no toilets - this is really surprising. However, states like Gujarat and Maharashtra are doing well,' he said.

Singh said that plans were afoot to extend the TSC to all districts of India by the end of 2007-08 financial year.

Speaking about other sanitation measures taken by his ministry, he said a water surveillance campaign worth Rs.2.68 billion had been launched to train five people in every panchayat (village clusters) to monitor water quality in villages.

'Currently 468 blocks in India have water surveillance laboratories. Under the new campaign, efforts would be made to extend the facility to every block.'

He said 216,000 village clusters were hit by the problem of poor quality water.

'We have reports of excessive fluoride, nitrate and presence of other chemicals in water. The authorities are working to provide quality water.'


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: defecation; india
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last
To: LibertarianInExile

I was trying to keep all these fecestious puns in order but someone came in and just rectum.


81 posted on 03/28/2006 1:26:03 PM PST by Rennes Templar ("The future ain't what it used to be".........Yogi Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar

With friends like that, who needs enemas?


82 posted on 03/28/2006 1:34:36 PM PST by SpinnerWebb (It's time to play Cowboys and Muslims)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962

In the 60s and 70s my aunt and uncle back in Colorado lived in a nice little log home with color TV, fireplace, lots of comfort for the times...but no indoor plumbing.


83 posted on 03/28/2006 1:37:56 PM PST by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile; Rennes Templar
"I was just about to sandwich it in somewhere and it's as if ya stole my bread."

See my #72....that RT sure is being a turd burglar today.

84 posted on 03/28/2006 2:37:57 PM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962; CarrotAndStick; Gengis Khan

Some advanced civlization, eh?


85 posted on 03/28/2006 3:33:08 PM PST by pganini
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pganini

Atleast they are not breaking their feet into ugly, septic wads of flesh, and then calling it beautiful.


86 posted on 03/28/2006 6:41:30 PM PST by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: SpinnerWebb

With friends like that, who needs enemas?

I agree. We just have to bear down and take it.


87 posted on 03/28/2006 8:57:50 PM PST by Rennes Templar ("The future ain't what it used to be".........Yogi Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: pganini

Yup. And when will your Chicom shithole become one?


88 posted on 03/28/2006 9:22:51 PM PST by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962

2012? gee, slow it down India, what's the big hurry?


89 posted on 03/28/2006 9:23:39 PM PST by isom35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zarf
India's strange -- a mixture of everything: what else can you expect from a place that has 850 languages and dialects, that has the largest number of Hindus in the world, the second largest number of Muslims in the world, over 30 million Christians, the largest number of Zoroastrians (after they fled Iran) in the world and is the birthplace of Buddhism, Jainism, Sikhism etc. The place that has so many cultures that the Tamil culture in the extreme south is completely distinct from the Panjabi culture in the north, the Mizo in the east etc.

A place that has brilliant entrepreneurs (like the 30% of Silicon startups are by Injuns), businessmen like Mittal and Premji but also the most mind-numbing poverty in the world. A place with the oldest literature in the world (the Mahabharata) but also which has 25% illiteracy -- and even among that, with states that are completely literate (Kerala and Mizoram) and practically illiterate states (like Bihar).

In the end it's diversity not a monochromatic entity like commieChina.
90 posted on 03/29/2006 3:32:23 AM PST by Cronos (Remember 9/11. Restore Hagia Sophia! Ultra-Catholic: Sola Scriptura leads to solo scriptura.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
At least we helped them with the nukes...nothing like a country that is unaware of the need for plumbing, but has the capability to incinerate anyone that pisses them off.

Actually they got the bomb on their own.

Do note that they have areas that are first world and areas that are crap turd world. They have brilliant folks and dumbasses. They have 1 billion people with all the possible diversity (cultural too), so clubbing all of them in one sentence is as silly as saying: oh, all earthlings don't have running water (because 3 billion + earthlings don't out of 6 billion)
91 posted on 03/29/2006 3:34:44 AM PST by Cronos (Remember 9/11. Restore Hagia Sophia! Ultra-Catholic: Sola Scriptura leads to solo scriptura.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

I know, you can step over the filth of the world in a street, only to be met by the finest state-of-the-art equipment inside a building.

Clubbing in general terms, entire continents even, is what makes the internet, and these anonymous forums, so popular.


92 posted on 03/29/2006 5:55:32 AM PST by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Gengis Khan

Oh yeah, great civilization with only 38% using toilets - that plus spicy food must made India smell REALLY NICE, eh? /sarc off.

BTW, i really enjoy pinging Indians such as yourself who are at the upper echelon of the society (Brahmins, etc.) who PROBABLY have a toilet (you do, right?) and would only look at other Indians in your social class and then declare a great civilization is India when 25% of the population in YOUR STANDARD is in poverty (World standard, more like 60%) and only 38% uses toilets.


93 posted on 03/29/2006 7:56:10 AM PST by pganini
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

Why are you grouping Indians in the US into India? They're successful here because of US infrastructure and because we don't enforce immigration laws (hence, see the increase in H1B's). Put those Indians in california back into India and see how far they'll go WITHOUT US companies.

I can see why India's FDI is so low -- who in his right mind would want to walk over piles of sh*t, both from your God the Cow + your God the Elephant and from humans on the street?


94 posted on 03/29/2006 7:58:50 AM PST by pganini
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: pganini; Cronos; Gengis Khan

http://www.poopreport.com/Travel/Content/China/china.html


The Chinese Culture Of Instant Gratification

In the middle of Yangshuo, China, is Yangshuo Park, a medium-sized park with a karst mountain in the center that can be climbed to a gazebo at its top. Entrance to the park costs nine Renminbi; it provides some quiet moments from the car horns loudly beeping on the main road in town.

The steps to the top of the mountain are poorly maintained, and the pavilion at the top is in even worse shape. In one corner the stench of piss and shit was unmistakable, as was the pile of the latter. Someone had made the five-minute climb, needed to relieve himself, and decided the five-minute walk back down to the public bathroom was too much to ask.

Before we walked up the short mountain my parents and I had meandered through the park, watching groups of mostly old men play cards. As we had approached the steps up the mountain a man came out of the bushes and went back to his card game -- he had been relieving himself in public. Apparently, the one-minute walk to the bathroom was too much for him.

Public urination and defecation in China is common among men across the entire age spectrum. A long time ago it became just a part of the scenery to me, with little astonishment attached to watching men relieve themselves anywhere they liked. I have what is -- to me, at least -- a classic photograph of a man taking a dump in front of the city walls of Pingyao, Shanxi Province. It's a stark photo: a wall looming above a man squatting in the broad, bare expanse that extends in front of the wall for about twenty-five meters. There is no respect to be found in the photo -- neither in the man shitting for all to see, nor in me for taking such a photo. I did not want it to be a photo of pretensions and I've always been happy that it lacks such things.

My parents, and especially my father, however, were shocked by having an otherwise excellent view of Yangshuo ruined by the odor and sight of shit at a mountaintop pavilion. In America, people are expected to pick up after their dogs, so the idea of a human not picking up after himself was fairly incomprehensible. My mother, though, said something that put this problem in an entirely different light: people piss and shit in public because they were never taught any better than satisfying an urge the instant that urge appears. Essentially, the moment they feel something, they do it.

So if you just drank a big bottle of water, you don't hold it -- you just unzip your pants, whip it out, and squirt. You just had a lunch? No worries, drop your pants and push. The idea of "holding it" until you find a public bathroom doesn't appear because it has never appeared.

Every person who has traveled to or lived in China has invariably commented on many children's crotchless pants, and on babies being held by their mother or father as they go to the bathroom right on the sidewalk. It's all kind of cute, especially when you see tender baby photos being displayed in photographer shop windows in which the boy's baby-maker is just hanging out there for all to see. As the boys and girls get older, some differences arise. You will almost never see women publicly urinating or defecating; the concept of "holding it" is generally adhered to, though it is slightly more flexible than what most women in the States might be used to. (I still have trouble understanding how groups of two and three schoolgirls are comfortable going together into a bathroom with only a single toilet, but having taught children for over four years now and seeing this happen repeatedly, I just take on faith that many girls are indeed comfortable with it.)

Many boys never get the "holding it" concept. The senior citizens fouling the Yangshuo Park are but one example, though this is something that I see practically every day anyways.

The lack of "holding it," however, extends far beyond simply going to the bathroom whenever one wants to. The idea behind it is that one tries to satisfy one's urges whenever one has them. There is no waiting for gratification, there is no planning for the future, and there is no one else valued just for their existence (though they might be valuable for what they can get you); there is nothing but me, my wants, and my moment right now.

If even the most basic of human physical urges are not restrained, how likely are things to be better higher up the urges food chain? Not likely, in my opinion. And if a human is simply a collection of his physical urges, then what on earth is moral about that? Moral behavior is based on aligning our actions against a standard of right and wrong, and that inevitably means we won't be able to do things that we really, really want to do. Public urination and defecation might not ascend all the way to a full-blown philosophical crisis, but the seeds for such a crisis are nonetheless there.

This inability to see past your own person is something widely commented on by foreigners in China. It takes different forms: crowds that gather around accidents but do absolutely nothing to help the injured people; the prevalence of "mei you" ("don't have;" see below) when asking for something from someone who knows perfectly well they have it or know where it is; corruption that is an in-your-face expression of selfishness; and confusing government bureaucracies which are essentially codified no-responsibility zones. All of these situations share a basic characteristic: only the very narrowly defined interests of a single person are considered.

We can go through examples of each to get a better idea of this. Yesterday (almost like manna from heaven for the purposes of this essay), there was a fire in the apartment block across the street from mine. I was walking back from buying vegetables at a nearby market and saw a gathering crowd and the unmistakable scent of ash. The fire engines hadn't arrived yet, but I could predict what was going to happen: people would come running to stare, point, and laugh, but certainly not to help. I ran upstairs to get my camera to document it.

And it all happened as I had expected. People on foot, on bike, and even on motorized bicycle came galloping to the scene. A crowd many hundreds strong surrounded the apartment and chattered away about someone else's misfortune. Children ran across the fire hose lines, laughing as they jumped across them. It had the air of a fair or a carnival -- someone else's misfortune was cause for their merriment.

If you go to Yangshuo there is a café on West Street called the "Mei You Café." That says it all. "Mei you" means "don't have" in Chinese, and is a common answer when someone just doesn't want to waste the time answering your question. The fact that a café would bank on the prevalence of the phrase to draw in customers is an unflattering commentary on the unwillingness of many Chinese to help out their fellow humans.

When I used to manage a school in the Jinzhou area of Dalian, I was once called by the guy I paid to maintain our relations with the local government. He was at lunch with the Anti-Corruption Bureau and needed my okay to pay for their food. I, needless to say, agreed. The Bureau capitalized on its "moral position" by actually being the most corrupt group of folks around. In the curious inversion of right and wrong that is so common in China, they would investigate those folks who didn't give them money.

Those who have run businesses in China will also be familiar with the runaround local governments give with their permits. Just to open a school you need to go at least to the Public Security Bureau, the Fire Bureau, the local police department, the local education department, the Decoration Bureau, the Billboard Sign Bureau, the Tax Bureau, and the Price-Setting Bureau; and all of these have multiple branches -- neighborhood, city, and province. Responsibility for anything is thus dispersed to the point of being meaningless, while at the same time a single person withholding his signature/chop in the hopes of getting more money out of you can bring the licensing process to a complete standstill. The system is specifically built to provide a responsibility-free environment in which government bureaucrats can accrue maximum personal benefit for themselves.

And that, indeed, is the crux of matters -- things are so fashioned in China that often narrow-minded selfishness is the most reasonable choice. In simple terms, the culture rewards immorality.

From birth to old-age, the lesson of base selfishness is reinforced again and again. Your physical needs should be taken care of as soon as possible. If you are at a train station, screw everyone else and jump the queue because you want your train ticket now. As a government bureaucrat, steal as much as money as you can as quickly as you can because you might not have another opportunity at the trough. If you see someone else in pain, stare, amuse yourself, but never ever do something to help because if you help someone then you become responsible for that person, and that is completely against your narrow self-interests.

This idea is sometimes taken to its logical, but most grotesque, end: at accidents that occur at places and times where there are no witnesses, but one of the drivers is injured, the other driver sometimes intentionally hits the other person again to kill him. Why? Because if he stayed alive the other driver would be responsible for his medical bills; but if he's dead then he doesn't have an impact on the other driver's life or pocketbook. Pause and consider the twistedness of that. Then pause again to consider that such stories are common enough to make it onto CCTV.

Self-interest is not immoral by definition, but I think it is fair to say that in the above situations it has sufficiently metamorphasized into an indefensible immorality; and I think it is also fair to say that its commonness points at deep problems in the culture itself.


95 posted on 03/29/2006 9:05:26 AM PST by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

The fact that you are actually READING that site says alot about your intellectual, or rather, lack thereof.

The last person that went to India from my company said that there were people pooping in the middle of the streetin MUMBAI, not some backwater little village places.

And as far as selfishness goes, an Indian colleague said that he watched as someone knifed another person in th emiddle of the street. Everyone gathers, no one helps him as he lies there with his guts hanging out. It's only after 15 minutes that someone agreed to take him to the hospital. I don't think Selfishness is a Chinese thing, it's as common as sh*t in indian streets. LOL!


96 posted on 03/29/2006 9:51:03 AM PST by pganini
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: pganini
Thank you!

Nice to know when I hit bulls-eye.


97 posted on 03/29/2006 9:54:18 AM PST by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

Beat me to it...


98 posted on 03/29/2006 10:04:18 AM PST by Wombat101 (Islam: Turning everything it touches to Shi'ite since 632 AD...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

Not really, you're the one tht has to live in that sh*thole :) The great Indian civilization that doesn't even have enough toilets.


99 posted on 03/29/2006 11:23:38 AM PST by pganini
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: BadAndy
I know someone who took a business trip to India and he came back with stories of people taking a dump out on the street.

Possibly because there was no alternative? I saw the same thing in Saigon in 1966. It wasn’t because of lack of class or modesty – it was because of a lack of restrooms. Much of the lower income population lived without plumbing – either indoor or outdoor. Most business had restrooms that were “For Customers Only” (much like Virginia Beach).
The people simply had no choice.
100 posted on 03/29/2006 11:29:58 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson