Posted on 03/26/2006 5:13:04 AM PST by LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
Edited on 03/26/2006 6:10:41 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
For almost two years, intelligence services around the world tried to uncover the identity of an Internet hacker who had become a key conduit for al-Qaeda. The savvy, English-speaking, presumably young webmaster taunted his pursuers, calling himself Irhabi -- Terrorist -- 007. He hacked into American university computers, propagandized for the Iraq insurgents led by Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and taught other online jihadists how to wield their computers for the cause.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/016480.php
May 16, 2007
“Judge in Internet Jihad trial: “I don’t really understand what a Web site is””
(REUTERS)
LONDON (Reuters) -
ARTICLE SNIPPET: “Violent Islamist material posted on the Internet, including beheadings of Western hostages, is central to the case....
Younes Tsouli, 23, Waseem Mughal, 24, and Tariq al-Daour, 21, deny a range of charges under Britain’s Terrorism Act, including inciting another person to commit an act of terrorism “wholly or partly” outside Britain.”
Adding 1 link:
Note: The folloiwing post is a quote:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1834820/posts
(Terrorism) Judge to prosecutor: ‘So what’s a Web site?’
MSN ^ | 5/16/07
Posted on 05/16/2007 4:34:15 PM PDT by Mr. Brightside
Judge to prosecutor: ‘So what’s a Web site?’
During Internet terrorism trial, judge asks attorneys to keep it simple
By Mark Trevelyan
Updated: 3:05 p.m. ET May 16, 2007 LONDON - A British judge admitted on Wednesday he was struggling to cope with basic terms like “Web site” in the trial of three men accused of inciting terrorism via the Internet.
Judge Peter Openshaw broke into the questioning of a witness about a Web forum used by alleged Islamist radicals.
“The trouble is I don’t understand the language. I don’t really understand what a Web site is,” he told a London court during the trial of three men charged under anti-terrorism laws.
Prosecutor Mark Ellison briefly set aside his questioning to explain the terms “Web site” and “forum.” An exchange followed in which the 59-year-old judge acknowledged: “I haven’t quite grasped the concepts.”
Violent Islamist material posted on the Internet, including beheadings of Western hostages, is central to the case.
(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...
Adding 1 link:
http://www.internet-haganah.com/harchives/006060.html
18 May 2007
“’Web site’ baffles Internet terrorism trial judge”
LONDON (Reuters)
I have a laser designed to cut microcircuits. How ‘bout a coupla hours with that and the guy?
Zackly
UPDATE:
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law/article1811095.ece
From The Times
May 19, 2007
“Just a case of playing Devils advocate for website judge”
Frances Gibb, Legal Editor
ARTICLE SNIPPET: “A spokesman for the Judicial Communications Office added: The judge knew perfectly well what a website was. He was in a sense playing Devils advocate, asking the questions that a member of the jury might want to ask.
After the judges comments the court was treated on Thursday to a PowerPoint demonstration by the computer expert giving evidence, Peter Sams. He explained that the internet was a complex communication system and you need to log into the system through a telephone cable or perhaps a television cable. The professor then explained the terms dial-up and broadband.
In the trial the defendants Younis Tsouli, 23, Waseem Mughal, 24, and Tariq al-Daour, 21, who deny the charges are accused of helping to distribute Islamic propaganda over the internet in support of al-Qaeda. Mr Tsouli, of West London, is said to have had links to an al-Qaeda group in Iraq. The trial continues.”
Adding 1 more link for archival purposes:
http://www.internet-haganah.com/harchives/006068.html
24 May 2007
“Just a case of playing Devil’s advocate for website judge”
(The Times - May 19, 2007)
http://counterterrorismblog.org/2007/07/terrorist_007_pleads_guilty_in.php
“’Terrorist 007’ Pleads Guilty in UK Crown Court”
By Evan Kohlmann
Note: The following text is a quote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6262676.stm
Last Updated: Monday, 2 July 2007, 17:34 GMT 18:34 UK
Two admit inciting terrorist acts
Two men have admitted inciting terrorist attacks against non-Muslims on websites and in e-mails.
Younes Tsouli, 23, of west London, and Waseem Mughal, 24, of Chatham, Kent, changed their pleas two months into their trial at Woolwich Crown Court.
The pair had links to al-Qaeda in Iraq and spent a year encouraging people to follow the ideology of Osama Bin Laden.
A third man, Tariq Al-Daour, 21, of west London, denies terror charges. His trial is due to resume on Wednesday.
Investigators found on Mr Tsouli’s laptop computer a presentation entitled The Illustrated Booby Trapping Course.
A film about how to make a suicide vest was found on a CD at Mughal’s home.
The court also heard that Mr Tsouli told Mr Mughal in an online conversation that he, Mr Tsouli, had been asked by al-Qaeda to translate the organisation’s official e-book into English.
Global
The book - Thurwat Al Sanam, or Tip Of The Camel’s Hump - is said to promote jihad, or holy struggle.
The pair believed there was a “global conspiracy” to wipe out Islam, the court was told.
Mr Tsouli and Mr Mughal admitted inciting another person to commit an act of terrorism wholly or partly outside the United Kingdom which would, if committed in England and Wales, constitute murder.
Mr Tsouli, of Shepherd’s Bush, was born in Morocco. Mr Mughal is UK-born.
Mr Al-Daour, born in the United Arab Emirates, denies the same charge.
He is also accused of conspiring to defraud banks, credit card companies and charge card companies, which he denies.
http://www.internet-haganah.com/harchives/006133.html
03 July 2007
JUSTICE - Irhabi007 surrenders to the obvious, changes plea to guilty
Moreover, any terrorist incident should fall under the authority of the military. The government should officially proclaim its policy of implementing law of war violation reprisal. Terrorist incidents should then be resolved with the following steps:
Now, if that doesn't get results and help win the war, then I suggest it would be high time to get downright Draconian on their asses.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1860916/posts
#
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/07/04/nterror2004.xml
‘Spooky’ website calls doctors to jihad
By John Steele, Crime Correspondent
Last Updated: 8:22pm BST 04/07/2007
ARTICLE SNIPPET: “A group of 45 Muslim doctors threatened to use car bombs and rocket grenades in terrorist attacks in the United States during discussions on an extremist internet chat site, it has emerged.
Anti-terrorist police found details of the discussions on a jihadi site run by one of a three-strong cyber-terrorist gang.
They were discovered at the home of Younis Tsouli, 23, Woolwich Crown Court in south east London heard.
One message, thought to have been sent on February 12 2005, read: ‘We are 45 doctors and we are determined to undertake jihad and take the battle inside America.
The first target which will be penetrated by nine brothers is the naval base which gives shelter to the ship Kennedy.
This is thought to have been a reference to the USS John F Kennedy, which is often at Mayport Naval Base in Jacksonville, Florida.
The message discussed targets at the base, adding: ‘These are clubs for naked women which are opposite the First and Third units.
It also referred to using six Chevrolet GT vehicles and three fishing boats and blowing up petrol tanks with rocket propelled grenades.
Tsouli replied to the message by saying He needs the recipe for making car bombs, and a recipe was supplied by one contributor, including gas cylinders as one ingredient.
Investigators have found no link between the Tsouli chat room and the group of doctors and medics currently in custody over attempted car bomb attacks in London and Glasgow.
However, sources said it was definitely spooky that the use of doctors for terrorist purposes was being discussed in jihadi terrorist circles up to three years ago.
Part of the inquiry into the London and Glasgow incidents will focus on whether al-Qaeda has recruited doctors or other medical professionals because they are less likely to attract suspicion and can move easily around the western world.
The three cyber terrorists - a British national and two who had been given the right to live in the UK - are facing lengthy jail sentences after admitting using the internet to spread al-Qaeda propaganda inciting Muslims to violent holy war and murder non-believers.
They had close links with al-Qaeda in Iraq and believed they had to fight jihad against a global conspiracy by kuffars, or non-believers, to wipe out Islam.
They were also linked to an extremist in Bosnia, who was jailed after police seized guns, explosives and videos espousing anti-western hatred, and to others in Sweden.
The three are the first defendants in Britain to be convicted of inciting terrorist murder on the internet.
Other cases, such as Abu Hamza, have involved incitement in speeches or at public meetings. Instead, the three waged cyber-jihad on websites run from their bedrooms.
Tsouli promoted the ideology of Osama bin Laden via email and radical websites using the cyber name ‘Irhaby007 - which means ‘Terrorist 007 in Arabic.
He said in one message he was very happy about the July 7 bombings in London in 2005.”
Hummmmmmmmm...
Does this mean when Terrorist 007 finally bites the dust... and gets to Islamic Heaven, will he find 72 of you waiting there for him with lust in your eyes?
Note: Photo included.
http://www.internet-haganah.com/harchives/006136.html
04 July 2007
“’Dad, I’m in jail...’”
I don’t think so Bender!
Maybe so, Pinky... But I'm a still a waiting for LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget to answer.
http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/42461000/jpg/_42461046_defendants203.jpg
~
Internet Discussion Forum:
http://forums.islamicawakening.com/showthread.php?s=e1a2a9ce5c71e6239a07eb1d60af3231&t=5867
“IA Forums > Main Topics > Politics and Current Affairs
Internet Jihadis admit inciting terror acts”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.