Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Struggle to save jobs at Winchester continues
People's Weekly World Newspaper ^ | March 25, 2006 | Joelle Fishman

Posted on 03/25/2006 1:16:06 PM PST by Jack Black

NEW HAVEN, Conn. — The struggle to save unionized manufacturing jobs and continue the 140-year production of Winchester sporting arms in New Haven has attracted national and international attention as the Belgian Herstal Group prepares to close its US Repeating Arms Company (USRAC) factory doors on March 31.

Workers and community activists began organizing when the January announcement was made, bringing public attention to the devastating impact the closing will have on the 180 workers, the African American community where the plant is located, and the entire city. The company has enjoyed $17 million in tax abatements which are tied to the retention of jobs.

A neighborhood meeting, plant gate rally and public hearing initiated by the Winchester Citizens Ad Hoc Committee have forced action to hold the company accountable. City officials are seeking cooperation from the company to find a new buyer and keep the Winchester trademark in New Haven, while at the same time preparing for possible legal action if necessary. Three potential buyers have expressed interest.

The company dismantled USRAC department by department in violation of a 1993 tax abatement agreement with the city, according to testimony by Winchester workers before a committee of the New Haven Board of Aldermen on March 16.

“They came in here like thieves and robbers,” said toolmaker Larry Edwards.

If production is moved, the agreement requires six months notice and reimbursement of all abatements. The company claims it is closing and not relocating.

Workers’ testimony confirmed removal of machinery to Columbia, S.C., during Christmas shutdown, and earlier removal of the wood shop, barrel shop and other production to Portugal and Japan. A new Russian Winchester plant was announced after the company gave notice it was going out of business.

The union, IAM Victory Lodge 609, is in tough negotiations over severance pay. The workers will be eligible for Trade Readjustment Act assistance.

Craig Gauthier speaks at plant gate rally to save jobs, March 15. Photo by Art Perlo/PWW. “This company has taken the collective skills, experience and knowledge for 140 years of worksmanship and moved it to continue making profits,” Craig Gauthier, chair of the Ad Hoc Committee, told the aldermen. He urged them to “take appropriate legal action” and require the company to continue wages and benefits for six months, continue seniority for five years, guaranteeing everyone severance and pensions, and to continue health benefits for two years.

“You can make history by fulfilling this resolution,” Gauthier testified. “It is only just, since the city and state invested their time, money and most precious resources — our workers’ lives — in this matter.”

“I watched Winchester from the ninth floor of my apartment building as a kid,” said Don Harris, recalling his first day of work in 1995 as a dream come true. “It’s wrong to get tax money and then close.”

Carey Dawson started working at USRAC in 2000. “Someone has to step up to the plate so that after the smoke clears and USRAC is gone we will still have jobs at the New Haven plant,” Dawson said.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: downsizing; fairtrade; freetrade; guns; outsourcing; unions; winchester
The source is a leftist one. None the less I thought a few others might be interested in the topic.
1 posted on 03/25/2006 1:16:10 PM PST by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jack Black
I checked out that site, I would like to get the companies reasons for closing to compare to what it written there.

One look at that "news" site was enough to convince me there is more going on than what they have written about.

2 posted on 03/25/2006 1:25:09 PM PST by Abathar (Proudly catching hell for posting without reading since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black
I don't agree with taxpayer money being used to support union labor jobs, and I also don't like that money, after being misused for that purpose, to be stolen.


If this company wants to close the doors, the public money should be returned if it was not used for the intended purposes.

At the very least, the public money which appears to have been mishandled, should at be deducted from the purchase price of the facility if these union workers want to buy the place.

Then, they- the union workers, will have to learn to become owner/operators/ shareholders/workers and employers.

That is probably the best solution, and a good way to end unionism, who's demands never take into account the finacial situation of the company they try hold hostage with labor disruptions.

3 posted on 03/25/2006 1:36:41 PM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Then again, if these "union workers" do not want to risk their own money on thier own jobs, they should'nt expect the taxpayer to either. Let the money pit die.


4 posted on 03/25/2006 1:42:32 PM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
Is this New Haven, Connecticut? If so I wonder what THEIR gun control laws are?

I do know that it is considered a liberal state.
5 posted on 03/25/2006 1:43:05 PM PST by frannie (Be not afraid of tomorrow - God is already there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black

The thought occurred to me that the mayor should ask the city to issue bonds so the union could purchase the assets and resume production under a new name.

The unio0n has all the workers and the eons of experience required. it should be a simple matter to turn things around with no foreign managers to get in the way.

It's so simple I can't see why they don't jump at the chance.
</sarcasm>


6 posted on 03/25/2006 1:50:05 PM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. Slay Pinch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frannie

Uh, yeah, that's New Haven, in Connecticut, the cradle of the U.S. firearms industry.

Much as I'd hate to see Winchester cease to exist, anything is better than government subsidy of inefficient union jobs.


7 posted on 03/25/2006 2:02:21 PM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bert
The thought occurred to me that the mayor should ask the city to issue bonds so the union could purchase the assets and resume production under a new name.

The name 'Winchester' is it's most valuable asset. The unionized workers....the least.

8 posted on 03/25/2006 2:33:40 PM PST by Donald Rumsfeld Fan ("fake but accurate": NY Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Donald Rumsfeld Fan

The old tooling has also gotta be worth something...

One thing this has sure sent the price of lever action Chinwesters skyrocketing...


9 posted on 03/25/2006 2:58:27 PM PST by joesnuffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy

>>Workers’ testimony confirmed removal of machinery to Columbia, S.C., during Christmas shutdown<<

If it didn't have any value they wouldn't have moved it.


10 posted on 03/25/2006 7:18:59 PM PST by B4Ranch (What has an alimentary canal, a big appetite at one end & no sense of responsibility at the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson