Some British media were critical of what they viewed as an apparent lack of a formal thank you from the peace activists for the efforts to rescue them.
They weren't the only ones who noticed...
To: Libloather
Day late............dollar short.......
2 posted on
03/25/2006 1:14:09 PM PST by
marmar
(Pray for our Warriors...they are the greatest there are............)
To: Libloather
He's a naive fool...but God doth love fools...
3 posted on
03/25/2006 1:16:08 PM PST by
in hoc signo vinces
("Houston, TX...a waiting quagmire for jihadis. American gals are worth fighting for!")
To: Libloather
Ex post facto "thank-you's" are worthless.
Make the SOB pay for rescue expenses or take him back.
4 posted on
03/25/2006 1:18:00 PM PST by
Zman516
("Allah" is Satan, actually.)
To: Libloather
I don't believe it. Sounds like a PR damage control statement.
5 posted on
03/25/2006 1:18:05 PM PST by
Dallas59
(MOHAMMED LIED-PEOPLE DIED)
To: Libloather
He sounds a bit different that the talking heads from his head office.
6 posted on
03/25/2006 1:20:29 PM PST by
armymarinemom
(My sons freed Iraqi and Afghan Honor Roll students.)
To: Libloather
Our soldiers risked their necks to save this turd?
They should have let the bad guys keep him.
Notice how they immediately killed the American.
I hope we killed the hostage takers out back someplace.
9 posted on
03/25/2006 1:27:08 PM PST by
Bon mots
To: Libloather
Dont worry about Jill Carroll , she is woorking with her captors. She will be "allowed" to come home when she is ready.
To: Libloather
It seems the 'thank you' only came after a couple of days of PR pressure and negative press for those 3 who were 'released'.
12 posted on
03/25/2006 1:35:19 PM PST by
TomGuy
To: Libloather
This is kind of self-serving. For awhile there these guys looked like they'd done in the fourth hostage when he discovered they were in cahoots with a kidnapping gang to rip off charitable groups for ransom.
Hey, still looks that way but this guy's figured it out.
14 posted on
03/25/2006 1:42:49 PM PST by
muawiyah
(-)
To: Libloather
We were impressed by the sensitivity with which it (the British government) responded to our concerns about any possible use of force in any rescue attemptGee, we're glad it met with your approval. I kind of wish we'd had to use bayonets and flamethrowers now.
To: Libloather
"There's a real sense in which you are interviewing the wrong person.Finally got one thing right you G__D__ senile worthless SOB. You put brave young men's lives at risk for the sake of your scummy morally diseased A**. Now get the hell out of the spotlight, go home, and may you die a stinking traitor's death in well deserved obscurity.
To: Libloather
" I do not believe a lasting peace can be achieved by armed force..."
You dumb schmuck. Without armed force, you'd be speaking German or Russian today.
18 posted on
03/25/2006 2:59:41 PM PST by
exit82
(If Democrats can lead, then I'm Chuck Norris.)
To: Libloather
The release of the trio has raised hopes among U.S. officials and family members that American reporter Jill Carroll
I am on the record as saying that the abduction of Jill Carroll is bogus and that Ms. Carroll is in bed with the jihadis...........
Stupid, idealistic twerp.........
To: Libloather
Did these asshats fabricate a kidnapping to get a taller soap box to spew the antiwar message ?
I guess it just appears that way.....:o)
23 posted on
03/25/2006 6:34:52 PM PST by
Squantos
(Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson