Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Public intoxication stings catch 2,200 in Texas bars
chron.com ^ | 3/23/06 | Anne Marie Kilday

Posted on 03/23/2006 8:18:08 AM PST by takenoprisoner

More than 2,200 people have been arrested in Texas bars in the six months since the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission announced a crackdown on public intoxication, primarily targeting bars.

The arrests included people who were drunk in bars, who sold alcohol to a drunk person, or a drunk employee on the premises of a bar or restaurant with a license to sell alcohol, said Carolyn Beck, a spokeswoman for the TABC.

The commission has been responsible for enforcing the state's alcoholic beverage code for the past 70 years. In August, 2005, the agency announced it was beginning a crackdown on public intoxication, using both undercover and open operations.

The agency has used undercover agents before, Beck said. In a recent operation, agents infiltrated 36 bars in a Dallas suburb and arrested 30 people for public intoxication.

(Excerpt) Read more at chron.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: aa; abuse; abuseofpower; alcohol; alcoholics; alcoholism; austin; bar; dallas; donutwatch; drunk; drunkdriving; dui; dwi; houston; madd; nannystate; police; policestate; potsmokerslaughing; revenuers; sanantonio; taxation; texas; twelvestepprogram; wacoraid; warondrugs; waronsomedrugs; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 421-436 next last
To: Junior
That was my thinking, bars are private establishments. We used to live in a subdivision where the roads were owned by the homeowner's association (don't get me started on that! a bunch of Nazis! Now we live on a farm), anyhow, the police couldn't ticket because they weren't county roads. Someone posted that this sting was set up to catch DWI's. I'd say they overstepped by a mile. Also, attributing intoxication to three or more beers? That's subjective. I'm 110 pounds, if I drank three beers (although I can't stand the stuff) I'd be rolling under the table. It would probably just make my husband burp!
161 posted on 03/23/2006 9:51:39 AM PST by Conservative Texan Mom (Some people say I'm stubborn, when it's really just that I'm right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer

Nah... I've sipped beer while sitting next to a police car at a traffic light. He watch me pick up the cup and just sort of waved at me.


162 posted on 03/23/2006 9:55:41 AM PST by Arrowhead1952 (Don't mess with Texas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner

I'm not a constitutional attorney but I believe that these arrests are unlawful under the 4th Amendment prohibiting illegal searches and seizures. A Bar, although a business, is still private property. Everyone who was arrested under this law should ask for a trial by jury (which they are entitled to under the Constitution) and countersue the City for unlawful arrest. Appeal any decisions in favor of the Gov't to the appellate courts (and possibly the Supreme Court)

The Courts will become overloaded and the City will not be able to pay to keep up with the caseload. The net effect I'm sure would be to change the law.


163 posted on 03/23/2006 9:57:46 AM PST by Daytyn71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graycliff

Yeah, you have a sad story..... you are the only one..... it's all about you....

You don't deserve America.


164 posted on 03/23/2006 9:58:00 AM PST by American_Centurion (No, I don't trust the government to automatically do the right thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Old_Mil
Why do people have so much trouble with something as simple as the law. .08 is the law. It dosen't matter what you or i think. If you have a problem with that, then take it up with your Representatives or your legislature.
165 posted on 03/23/2006 9:58:38 AM PST by Graycliff (Long haired freaky people, need not apply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Junior_G

Nobody stopping you from being a drunk?


166 posted on 03/23/2006 10:00:54 AM PST by Graycliff (Long haired freaky people, need not apply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000
More than 2,200 people have been arrested in Texas bars Can you say class action suit?

Class action suits just make the lawyers rich.

Now 2,200 individual suits. That'll leave a mark.

167 posted on 03/23/2006 10:01:41 AM PST by ItsForTheChildren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Graycliff
If your idea of freedom is getting drunk and doing anything you want to, then you can keep it.

My idea of freedom isn't barrelling down the road drunk. But these officers weren't arresting drunk drivers. They were arresting people drinking in a bar. Arresting people for crimes that they have not committed is BS, no matter how much of a puritanical zealot you are.

168 posted on 03/23/2006 10:02:11 AM PST by Junior_G
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Graycliff

.08 isn't the determining factor in this instance.

It's been stated several times that "drunk" is subjective to the officer's judgement for Public Intoxication. And these TABC agents were using 3 or more beers as their measuring stick.

You are an authoritarian supporting facism.


169 posted on 03/23/2006 10:02:25 AM PST by American_Centurion (No, I don't trust the government to automatically do the right thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte; Dashing Dasher
We'll protect you! ;)

LOL

It's good to have friends!!!!
170 posted on 03/23/2006 10:04:52 AM PST by PaulaB (Many years have passed since those summer days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: Junior_G

SHHHH!!! Rather than realize the error of their ways, the nanny-staters will use your logic to start pre-emptively arresting people in their homes.

maybe instead of that they should just go after all the distributers for intentionally distrubuting anything that might be sold to someone for personal enjoyment just in case???


171 posted on 03/23/2006 10:07:02 AM PST by me-here
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: eastforker

I pushed nothing, i just gave an opinion.


172 posted on 03/23/2006 10:07:13 AM PST by Graycliff (Long haired freaky people, need not apply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Texas Mom

"Are you going to sleep in the bar or drive home? Get them in the bar before they head home."

Well, now. As a matter of fact, some of these arrests have taken place in hotel bars, where many of the patrons would be likely to just get in the elevator and go back to their rooms.

Get real, please.


173 posted on 03/23/2006 10:10:10 AM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: American_Centurion
Not just me, theres thousands more just like mine.
174 posted on 03/23/2006 10:10:34 AM PST by Graycliff (Long haired freaky people, need not apply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: American_Centurion

This article isn't about drunk driving. It isn't even about fall down dangerous drunks. It's about facist pig jackboots, abusing the law to criminalize people, enhance revenue, and retard freedom.


I consider anyone who advocates this type of police-state activity an enemy of freedom.



175 posted on 03/23/2006 10:11:04 AM PST by WhiteGuy ("Every Generation needs a new revolution" - Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: me-here

Go after the distributors, the brewers, the bartenders, and the patrons. Go after them with taxes, licensing fees, more taxes and jail time. It's a crusade!! Woohoo!!!


176 posted on 03/23/2006 10:11:16 AM PST by Junior_G
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

Look at all the "conservatives" defending this!


177 posted on 03/23/2006 10:11:49 AM PST by metesky ("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Junior_G

maybe we should all go back to backyard moonshine?


178 posted on 03/23/2006 10:13:24 AM PST by me-here
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner

Der Kommissar's in town!


179 posted on 03/23/2006 10:15:28 AM PST by JZelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graycliff

Don't be surprised when your views backfire on you and you are the target of state sponsored criminalization for your own good. Or you wind up like the last powerful batch of fascists, gasping for air at the end of a rope.

Not a threat, that's just the way these things always end up. Maybe you'll be lucky and die of old age before your utopia comes around to bite you in the butt.


180 posted on 03/23/2006 10:15:54 AM PST by American_Centurion (No, I don't trust the government to automatically do the right thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 421-436 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson