Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bar Sweep Sparks Controversy (Drunk People Arrested in Bars!!)
NBC5i.com ^ | March 23, 2006

Posted on 03/22/2006 10:40:15 AM PST by Daytyn71

The Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission sent a message to bar patrons last week.

TABC agents and Irving police swept through 36 Irving bars and arrested about 30 people on charges of public intoxication. Agency representatives say the move came as a proactive measure to curtail drunken driving.

North Texans interviewed by NBC 5, however, worried that the sweep went too far.

At one location, for example, agents and police arrested patrons of a hotel bar. Some of the suspects said they were registered at the hotel and had no intention of driving. Arresting authorities said the patrons were a danger to themselves and others.

"Going to a bar is not an opportunity to go get drunk," TABC Capt. David Alexander said. "It's to have a good time but not to get drunk."

Dallas comedian Steve Harvey agreed with the Texas residents who said the arrests infringed on individual rights.

"If a guy's got a designated driver, go ahead and let him get toasted," Harvey told NBC 5.

Texas law states that inebriated individuals could be subjected to arrest anywhere for public intoxication. Harvey and other North Texans called the measure extreme.

"That seems to be an extreme case," one man said. "You are self-contained, in the hotel, you're not going in the streets, it seems a little ridiculous."

TABC officials said the sweep concerned saving lives, not individual rights. Harvey and others interviewed by NBC 5 said they believe drunken driving to be unacceptable, although Harvey wanted to confirm that the United States remains a free country.

"Freedom of drinking should always be allowed, and it is only American to let a guy get drunk where he wants to get drunk," Harvey said.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: bars; beer; brownshirts; dallas; donutwatch; drunkdriving; fourthamendment; houston; leoabuse; liqour; policestate; revenueenhancement; sanantonio; spelling; texas; theman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 221-239 next last
To: D.P.Roberts
If this clown drinks, he's toast. Some local editor will keep an eye on him and get a good story out of it if he's ever seen drunk somewhere.

The yankee editors of the Dallas and Fort Worth MSM papers actively support this type of official oppession.

121 posted on 03/22/2006 12:30:57 PM PST by fella (Respect does not equal fear unless your a tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
I'm a little behind the times. Apparently they stopped it WAAAAAAAY back in 2001 and have slid into nearly absolute prohibition since then.

Actually Wyoming was just trying to pass an open container law and it failed again. There is still some freedom left in at least Wyoming.
122 posted on 03/22/2006 12:35:49 PM PST by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Heyworth

No constitutional right trumps the agenda of "Public Safety". It's the best thing since "Interstate Commerce"


123 posted on 03/22/2006 12:36:15 PM PST by Dead Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Bigs from Michigan
Bigs lectures:

it should amaze me that so many of you think it is some form of government intrusion that you have no right to be drunk in public, but I am not.

Get a grip bigs. The laws we have on public drunks are based on being a public nuisance/ breaching the peace. No display/breach, no nuisance.

These cops were over the line, breaching the peace of the bar customers.

As for our founding fathers, up to the early 1870s, it was common for public pillorying for public drunkenness.

Those were clearly unconstitutional State or local 'laws'; just as is the texas law in question.

During the Civil war U.S. Grant had solders strapped spread eagle on wagon wheel for Public drunkenness.

Military courts are not subject to some constitutional restraints.

At no time has being drunk in public been a right; tolerated, yes, legal, no.

At no time has being unobtrusively drunk in public been a crime; Nuisance drunks are not tolerated, yes, but 'legally', drinking is not a crime.

Please don't confuse public tolerance for legal right.

Please don't confuse the power to enact public 'tolerance' regulations for a constitutional right to prohibit the harmless acts of individuals.

Neither Fed, State, or local governments can enact regulations that deprive people of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.

124 posted on 03/22/2006 12:36:25 PM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: vikzilla

......What taste better, the leather boots or the residue on your chin......

thats' tellin old BIGGIE....go get em' Laddie


125 posted on 03/22/2006 12:36:51 PM PST by NKByrum (Who's your daddy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Daytyn71

The March of the Coercive Utopians continues unabated.


126 posted on 03/22/2006 12:38:06 PM PST by Inwoodian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s

Waaaaaay back in high school, a group of us would hop in a car and head off for a night at the bars. On more then one occasion, a state trooper would pull us over and after shining the flashlight in each of our eyes, he would ask if any one of us in the car had less than two beers tonight. As if on cue, everyone would turn and point to Jeff who was, of course, sitting scrunched up in the backseat of the car, furthest from the steering wheel. The trooper would then "recommend" that Jeff should switch seats with the driver. After a two or three block escort, the trooper would turn off in another direction and we'd be on our merry way.

My how things have changed. Now you can't even drink in a bar of all places!


127 posted on 03/22/2006 12:38:48 PM PST by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Oh, another Ron White fan!!! Me Too!!!!!


128 posted on 03/22/2006 12:40:45 PM PST by SkyDancer ("Talent Without Ambition is Sad, Ambition Without Talent Is Worse")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Gabz
because he had his car keys in his pocket it was claimed "the intent to drive" was there

A couple goes on vacation to a fishing resort in northern Minnesota. The husband likes to fish at the crack of dawn - the wife likes to read.

One morning the husband returns after several hours of fishing and decides to take a nap.

Although not familiar with the lake, the wife decides to take the boat out. She motors out a short distance, anchors, and continues to read her book.

Along comes a game warden in his boat. He pulls up alongside the woman and says, "Good morning Ma'am. What are you doing?"

"Reading a book," she replies, (thinking, "Isn't that obvious?")

"You're in a restricted fishing area," he informs her.

"I'm sorry officer, but I'm not fishing, I'm reading."

"Yes, but you have all the equipment. For all I know you could start at any moment. I'll have to take you in and write you up."

"If you do that, I'll have to charge you with sexual assault," says the woman.

"But I haven't even touched you," says the game warden.

"That's true, but you have all the equipment. For all I know you could start at any moment."
129 posted on 03/22/2006 12:44:41 PM PST by Famishus (I have not lost my mind; it's backed up on disc somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Bigs from Michigan
you're over the top......going along with your theory, do you think cops should be able to come to YOUR house and arrest YOUR company if they are having a few brews?....

afterall, YOUR home is not their home......

130 posted on 03/22/2006 12:45:29 PM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: elc

.....They actually did something similar in Herdon, VA last year or the year before......


You are correct...it was at Ned Devine's Irish Pub....and the program was discontinued within 2 weeks...I am from Reston and USED to go to Ned's. I will stick to my watering hole (Lakeside Inn) where I know it is safe...I have a key to the back exit


131 posted on 03/22/2006 12:46:06 PM PST by NKByrum (Who's your daddy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

Bigs needs Zot.


132 posted on 03/22/2006 12:48:22 PM PST by CJ Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice
that's fine....but let the cops arrest people as they start their cars up.......they have no right to arrest somebody for something that they might do later on.......

this is not a debate in favor of drunk driving at all......

133 posted on 03/22/2006 12:48:24 PM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Bigs from Michigan
You have no right what so ever to be plastered/drunk . . . on your anchored boat

Really? How about tied up dockside? Is that illegal too?

134 posted on 03/22/2006 12:48:44 PM PST by atlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Inwoodian
It is going to be interesting (albeit sickening) to see the convoluted hoops the courts jump through to rationalize this unconstitutional behavior.
135 posted on 03/22/2006 12:49:49 PM PST by ChildOfThe60s
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Daytyn71

The liberals are wrong in saying that it is Halliburton and oil companies that run this nation. It's actually the insurance companies who do.


136 posted on 03/22/2006 12:52:12 PM PST by Old_Mil (http://www.constitutionparty.org - Forging a Rebirth of Freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hatteras

waaay back when I was in HS one could cruise around sipping on a cold beer legally. No, of course not drunk. We didn't have breath analyzers then...at least none that I ever heard.

Sure, teenagers had fatal crashes then too. Some were alcohol related and some involved teetotal sober negligence and/or plain lack of experience.


Whatever happened to individual responsibility? But more important, how the hell did we ever survive then living in such a free state?


137 posted on 03/22/2006 12:52:48 PM PST by takenoprisoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer; Yo-Yo

Brother: I've got tiny wipers that clear the headlights in the rain.

Ron: I got a place in my van where I can f*** your sister.




LOL


138 posted on 03/22/2006 12:52:48 PM PST by Petronski (I love Cyborg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: CJ Wolf

I love your profile page! LOL.


139 posted on 03/22/2006 12:53:16 PM PST by EBH (We're too PC to understand WAR has been declared upon us and the enemy is within.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: shempy
"Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy."- Benjamin Franklin

Did he really say this?
140 posted on 03/22/2006 12:53:26 PM PST by bearsgirl90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 221-239 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson