Skip to comments.
North Korea Suggests It Can Strike U.S. First
Associated Press
| March 21, 2006
Posted on 03/21/2006 8:20:32 AM PST by HAL9000
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
To: mbynack
"The goal of a preemptive strike is destroy the ability of the enemy to respond effectively. Unless they have thousands of warheads and can figure out exactly where all of our Boomers, missile frigates, ICBMs, and ALCMs are located, they better not get too cocky."
and don't forget all the subs that are practically undetectable and have missiles aimed at NK.
41
posted on
03/21/2006 8:42:01 AM PST
by
varyouga
(I no longer fear death. I only fear the day when the DUmmies take over.)
To: Eric in the Ozarks
If that pilot is really good he can get that B-52 so low no radar would ever see him can he do why hell yes.
42
posted on
03/21/2006 8:42:23 AM PST
by
boomop1
(there you go again)
To: in hoc signo vinces
a terrorist first strike nuke strike by the combined forces of the NK, Iran, Cuba, Venezuela could be problematic.
To: HAL9000
Throwing tantrums and making threats does not get you a seat at the grownup table.
44
posted on
03/21/2006 8:44:07 AM PST
by
Spruce
(Keep your mitts off my wallet)
To: nmh
"
We'll VAPORIZE YOU."
Nikita? Welcome to FR. I thought you were dead.
45
posted on
03/21/2006 8:45:16 AM PST
by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: ASA Vet
46
posted on
03/21/2006 8:45:38 AM PST
by
A Balrog of Morgoth
(With fire, sword, and stinging whip I drive the RINOs in terror before me.)
To: BenLurkin
"I wonder. There are far too many anti-American politicians high up I the running.
Fortunately, the traitor who ran for President in 2004 lost
Next time we not be so lucky."
I fully understand your pessimism......
That being said, the minute that little knob in North Korea pushes that button, I am pretty confident that the Anti-America scumbags in Washington will disappear. The fist one that pops off about how we somehow "deserved it", will likely find themself being drawn and quartered.....deservedly so.
I do believe that there are more of us (TRUE PATRIOTS) than there of "them". We just don't get the coverage in the MSM.
47
posted on
03/21/2006 8:45:42 AM PST
by
Howie66
("America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our people.")
To: HAL9000
I think President Bush should send Kim Jong a bag of marshmellows with a message saying "Please except these toasted marshmallows as a token of my appreciation for all you have done"
Kim Jong II will look at the bag and say "Hey, deese marshmelrows not toasted..what wrong here......pause......RUT ROH! George Bush mad, he realry mad!!!
48
posted on
03/21/2006 8:46:17 AM PST
by
TheForceOfOne
(Memogate - Dan Rathers Little Big Horn.)
To: HAL9000
One thing Kim should keep in mind is that after statements like that, the next time they have war games, we might get the wrong impression and it may turn into more than a game.
To: HAL9000
50
posted on
03/21/2006 8:47:48 AM PST
by
petercooper
(Cemeteries & the ignorant - comprising 2 of the largest Democrat voting blocs for the past 75 years.)
To: sionnsar
well - what if kim isn't interested in surviving ?
51
posted on
03/21/2006 8:49:48 AM PST
by
globalheater
(There is no instance of a country having benefited from prolonged warfare - Sun Tzu)
To: HAL9000
Right. Their Tiny-dong missile doesn't have the range to hit much, and if they strike Seattle they're only attacking a friendly country anyway.
Kim and Chavez and Ahmadinejad better pray that nobody takes them seriously.
To: HAL9000
And how would you like your Kimchee sir, hot, extra hot or radioactive?
To: HAL9000
Always let the bum swing first.
54
posted on
03/21/2006 9:01:49 AM PST
by
manwiththehands
(Islam is as Islam does. Islam is as Islam allows.)
To: Eric in the Ozarks
What in the wide, wide world of sports is goin' on here?
To: Billthedrill
No one can really say what range their new generation missiles are and if they have the capability of carrying an atomic warhead accurately.
Since it's not been tested, the delivery system can't be evaluated.
But who would want to on the receiving end of that test?
56
posted on
03/21/2006 9:05:25 AM PST
by
romanesq
To: boomop1
That would be the CRM 117 discriminator.
To: petercooper
Ever notice that little Kim is the only fat Korean in that country?
58
posted on
03/21/2006 9:11:16 AM PST
by
Centurion2000
(Islam's true face: http://makeashorterlink.com/?J169127BC)
To: sionnsar
Even if they were able to "strike first", one suspects North Korea would not be a healthy place to be immediately following... Monaco, Sealand, or Togoland could strike first, too.
I have had friends from overseas visit, and they just did not grasp how big this place is. They assumed, when visiting us in New England, that they would get on a bus that evening, and see the Grand Canyon the next morning.
To: petercooper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson