Posted on 03/21/2006 1:38:11 AM PST by beaversmom
BATAVIA, Ohio -- A man who neighbours say was devoted to his meticulously kept lawn is charged with murder in the shooting of a 15-year-old boy who apparently walked across his yard.
Charles Martin, 66, of Union Township, near this city about 30 kilometres east of Cincinnati, shot next-door neighbour Larry Mugrage in the chest with a shotgun about 3:30 p.m. Sunday, police said. The youth was pronounced dead at hospital.
Martin was being held without bond yesterday in Clermont County Jail. Police said he told them he had several disputes about neighbours walking on his lawn. But Union Township police Lieut. Scott Gaviglia said Martin had no criminal history and last called police in 2003.
Martin called 911 on Sunday, saying in a calm voice: "I just killed a kid."
He also tells the dispatcher: "It's been going on for five years ... I've been harassed by him and his parents for five years. Today just blew it up."
STUNS NEIGHBOURHOOD
The deadly shooting stunned those in the neighbourhood and students at Glen Este High School, where Martin was a freshman, and grief counsellors were on hand yesterday.
"I think there's a great deal of shock, for two reasons: because of the age of the victim and just how this occurred, killed over some grass," Gaviglia said.
Neighbours said Martin lived alone quietly, often sitting out in front of his one-storey home with its neat lawn, well-trimmed shrubbery and flag pole with U.S. and navy flags flying.
In his fenced backyard, he had several birdhouses and a shed painted like a small red barn with white trim.
Hey! All my hangers go the same way. (That's the only way they'll go on the bar)
I always like to keep an old knife handy. Whenever I shoot a kid I put the knife in his hand. No one's walked on my lawn since '98.
ping
It's a sad thing. A tragedy. And a crime that can't be justified. However, if you dwell on grim parade of these that happen far too often, you'll go mad without humor.
You sound suspciously like a Muslim. In weaving carpets, an imperfection is intentionally included since only Allah could make a perfect carpet.
Finally - a school system that doesn't believe in social promotion.
He could have put the gun near the sleeping mexican or lawn jockey statues, then when the police showed up said, "Yeah, it was a black guy and a spanish guy. I didn't see which was the shooter."
Bruce Dern in the movie "'Burbs"
Mine do too. Twelve years after getting out of the Air Force, almsot twenty two years out of basic training, and I'm still worried that a Training Instructor will come out of nowhere and chew me out for having my clothes hanging wrong. Some habits are hard to break, you know?
Just scanning down the posts and see you are VERY wrong. Defending oneself from criminals is much different than this case. It's too bad you must not agree.
You just had to bring up the coat hangers, didn't you.
Simple lesson here:
Don't deliberately provoke people you know are crazy.
There are LOTS of people out there who are just a
tweak away from murder. And you don't always know who
they are.
Be careful, out there....
--Travis--
It's called a pre-emptive strike.
I try to maintain a nice lawn..but the reason is not for show. Kids playing on the lawn is the ultimate sense of satisfaction. My lawn is not for show, but use. Ask my seven-year old and his buddies.
You better have a long talk with your lawyer. Courts protect our property rights, not guns.
This applies to most other rights also. I don't want to read about you shooting some guy over your right to 'free speech'.
Mr Martin had other recourse, however in the atmosphere of the court room today there is probably a 50/50 chance of a ruling against him. A few of those rulings and soon you will have your front door open to anyone who needs to use the bathroom and just happens to be walking by. The courts are loosing their concept of the rights of landowners, no matter if it is a land baron rancher in Texas with thousands of acres or someone in a brownstone in Harlem, they all have basic landowner rights which include the rights of privacy (no trespassing on others property).
In this case I would have to assume (I hate that word as it does make an ass out of u and me) the kids parents did nothing about it although they had been warned. Just a little discipline here and that young man would be in class today rather than at a funeral home. Okay, folks you all just flame away.
It's ashame the police thought his conflict with this kid was unimportant.
I mean, the whole point of police and laws is avoid problems like this. The kid knows he shouldn't be on the lawn. That's the law. The police should apply force, if necessary to stop him. That's the law, too.
So this guy is miserable for 5 years because the law didn't work for him. And the kid knew it wasn't working for him. That's why he kept doing it.
So what's this old-timer supposed to do? He has no outs. He's being exploited because he constrains himself to the law and the kid is not constrained by the law.
Sure, the old-timer went to far. But I don't think there'd be any problem with the guy giving that kid a punch in the mouth. The kid can't expect to treat others with incivility and not get incivility back.
Well at least no other kids will be crossing HIS lawn now!
Anyways, when I was a child, and if I did something to make a neighbor cross, and kept on doing it, contrary to their instructions, I would have paid dearly!
Nwoadays parents back their children up all the time, no matter how they behave.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.