Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
Posted on 03/20/2006 9:56:09 AM PST by Grig
This falls in with what I was saying on another thread about samples. It doesn't usually matter whether your work is infringing, nor does it matter if it's really fair use. What matters is your financial ability to defend yourself against attacks.
Why should anyone have to worry about a suit over silence? Why should a documentary maker have to pay Fox or prepare for court over four seconds of The Simpsons showing in the background of a shot? The way corporate lawyers run copyright and patent these days is creating a result opposite the intent of the Constitution.
Let's see, you could probably copyright "It's Bush's Fault" with some kind of artistic writing. You could trademark "It's Bush's Fault" in association with selling a certain line of products. You could probably patent a "Process for making people believe everything is Bush's Fault."
On trademark, that could be interesting. Say you get a line of clothing, coffee mugs, etc., with the registered trademark "It's Bush's Fault" for the whole ine of products. Then you can sue when you see DU selling stuff and saying "It's Bush's Fault" anywhere near it.
It is.
I'm gonna patten the word ZOT. Time to retire.
I just patented your screen name. You're screwed.
The first recorded patent of invention was granted to John of Utynam. In 1449, he was awarded a 20-year monopoly for a glass-making process previously unknown in England. In return for his monopoly, John of Utynam was required to teach his process to others. That same function of passing on information is now fulfilled when a patent specification is published.
Some folks call published material "information."
Since when is a design or process not "information"? If you've ever seen a set of specifications in a CADD file, it lays out where the lines and surfaces go, what the text is, what the materials are, etc all on various layers and in various files. It is only information that gets transferred to a numerical control machine to produce the product. All there is to making anything is knowledge, labor, and raw material. The latter two are obviously not patentable.
Bump to the top
Ok so now how much do i owe you?Dont worry im good for it. I just patented the term bttt so ill be swimming in money soon too :-)
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
LOL. "Revolver" sounds a lot cooler than "rotator," doesn't it. :-)
The world turned upside down!
Just what the devil wants.
I think the screen name "patent" has been patented. He's currently suing patton for having a sound-alike name.
True. Also, a revolver can be hidden near the rotator cuff (though I think DeNiro had a small auto hidden up there).
lol
So you own the rights to a typo.
This thread is patently absurd.
I just copyrighted the alphabet. Now nobody can use it without my permission.
"The Earth "orbits" or "circles" the Sun,"
Bah. Its all based on your arbitrary frame of reference. Its equally possible that the sun does in fact orbit the earth and that the earth is the center of the universe. It just depends on which set of mathematics you prefer.
I prefer to think that I am the center of the universe and will insist, once I sieze power, that all motion be described relative to me.
Actually, the homocysteine is an indicator for heart disease, and while B-12 improves the homocysteine level, it doesn't reduce the risk of heart disease.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.