Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Carry_Okie; E. Pluribus Unum
"Do you think a design is property but information isn't?"

Information is specifically NOT patentable under US law. Look it up...
65 posted on 03/20/2006 1:32:13 PM PST by babygene (Viable after 87 trimesters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: babygene
Information is specifically NOT patentable under US law.

The first recorded patent of invention was granted to John of Utynam. In 1449, he was awarded a 20-year monopoly for a glass-making process previously unknown in England. In return for his monopoly, John of Utynam was required to teach his process to others. That same function of passing on information is now fulfilled when a patent specification is published.

Some folks call published material "information."

Since when is a design or process not "information"? If you've ever seen a set of specifications in a CADD file, it lays out where the lines and surfaces go, what the text is, what the materials are, etc all on various layers and in various files. It is only information that gets transferred to a numerical control machine to produce the product. All there is to making anything is knowledge, labor, and raw material. The latter two are obviously not patentable.

67 posted on 03/20/2006 1:55:57 PM PST by Carry_Okie (Barah, yetzirah, assiyah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson