Posted on 03/20/2006 9:56:09 AM PST by Grig
The Earth revolves around the Sun.
The speed of light is a constant.
Apples fall to earth because of gravity.
Elevated blood sugar is linked to diabetes.
Elevated uric acid is linked to gout.
Elevated homocysteine is linked to heart disease.
Elevated homocysteine is linked to B-12 deficiency, so doctors should test homocysteine levels to see whether the patient needs vitamins.
ACTUALLY, I can't make that last statement. A corporation has patented that fact, and demands a royalty for its use. Anyone who makes the fact public and encourages doctors to test for the condition and treat it can be sued for royalty fees. Any doctor who reads a patient's test results and even thinks of vitamin deficiency infringes the patent. A federal circuit court held that mere thinking violates the patent.
All this may sound absurd, but it is the heart of a case that will be argued before the Supreme Court on Tuesday.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
I believe the writer left off three important words that are usually used, "in a vacuum."
Unless you have hard data to support that conclusion, it is a subjective one at best. Just because someone would have to pay for the use of intellectual property (which you put in quotes) doesn't mean that net innovation is discouraged. Rewarding the producer has a way of motivating the demonstrably productive.
Copyright now lasts far beyond your death, or most likely an infinite term since the government keeps retroactively extending it.
Wishing for the old days, 28 years plus a 28-year renewal. That's more in line with the constitutional intent.
In purely geometric terms, it's no more correct to say the Earth orbits the Sun than to say the Sun circles around the Earth. In terms of Newtonian mechanics, neither statement is correct: both bodies orbit their common center of mass.
The common center of mass between the earth and the sun is located within the sun, so it is more correct to say the earth orbits the sun.
You may want to patent the word "pattented" while you're at it.
The speed of light is still a constant, because it can be applied in a formula to determine refractive index. Now, velocity...
Free market privatization on the march. Soon everything will be owned by some private entity including the air we breath.
See my tagline.
USSC will throw this patent out.
I'm safe then. I'm a high school math teacher and that tune has never been sung in my class. At least, not for that duration.
I got you beat. Last week, I patented the letter "E." This thread alone has netted me enough to finish paying off my bass boat.
So if my revolver cylinder rotates, what revolves and what does it revolve around? Should I put a tether on it? :-)
It is not a cylinder, it is a flat disk that rotates by means of a turntable device and plays music from vibrations the needle picks up following the set grooves in the disk.
Revolver was an okay album.
"Revolver was an okay album."
Also doubles as a Frisbee(TM) which neither rotates nor revolves but is sometimes described as a "gyroscopically stabilized disk," so I guess it gyrates, but not like this one girl I knew but I can't get into that right now.
I copyrighted and petented the phriase "It's Bush's Fault" I'll get rich off of all the liberals.
I copyrighted and patented the phrase "It's Bush's Fault" I'll get rich off of all the liberals.
Now, any thought that occurs to you can be patented if you can afford it. It's absolutely insane and unsustainable.
Facts can't be copyrighted--why could a patent be issued on a "fact'?
Maybe this is just semantics, but the speed of light is constant in ANY medium. The speed of light WILL vary as it leaves one medium and enters another, but within any medium, the speed of light is constant.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.