Posted on 03/17/2006 6:57:33 AM PST by little jeremiah
Left’s Utopia Totalitarian Hell on Earth
Lurking within the twisted corridors of the left’s collective mind dwells the seductive image of a glorious utopia. Leftists are certain that with their Promethean genius they could build an earthly utopia if they could but acquire total control over the world, its wealth, resources, and every human person. The infuriating stumbling block is Americans who hold traditional values. These Americans refuse to worship the ''new gods''…the Promethean Left… and vigorously cling to their individuality and inalienable rights. For these reasons, the left—driven by malignant envy and seething rage—has been waging an all-out ''slash and burn'' campaign against America’s traditional Christian-Judeo culture and essential social institutions, such as the traditional family.
Since the leftists virtually controls the educational process, they have been able to indoctrinate and churn out self-absorbed, hedonistic individuals who, while competent at putting condoms on bananas, are sadly ignorant with regards to the truth of America’s founding and process of civics and government. In the resultant atmosphere of self-absorption, licentiousness, and ignorance, leftists were able to introduce communist multiculturalism and political correctness into America’s culture, politics, academia, entertainment, and information dissemination venues. As a consequence, most Americans have come to accept forced existence as members of various mythological ''tribes.'' There are two sorts: oppressor tribes and the tribes who have been victimized by the former. In this state of mass delusion and dysfunction, our government on the one hand, eggs on the special rights tribes, implying that they are suffering from oppression and thus ''entitled'' to special treatment, while on the other hand it terrorizes and punishes the guilty oppressor tribes through vicious smear tactics, repressive speech codes, forced sensitivity and diversity training, and hate crime laws.
The left has deliberately ignited class warfare knowing that the resultant confusion, paranoia, hatred, and fighting over rights and privileges will eventually lead to anarchy and implosion of our civilization. To keep the pot boiling, the left churns out a steady stream of frivolous and spurious rights to appease the “victim” tribes. In turn, these constructed rights need to be administered by an ever-growing body of intrusive and repressive laws and regulations. In this manner our true and inalienable rights, such as freedom of speech, become diminished, redefined and eventually lost.
Among the many counterfeit rights, all of which have proven themselves socially destructive are: choice, privacy, obscenity, sodomy, and the ''right'' to make and use pornography--even child pornography.
The genesis for the hedonism, sexually oriented tribes and likewise many of the fraudulent rights is found within an address made by the Hon. A. S. Herlong, Jr. of Florida to the House of Representatives, Jan. 10, 1963, entitled “Current Communist Goals.”
24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them ''censorship'' and a violation of free speech and free press
25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity
26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as ''normal, natural, healthy''
(Source: Congressional Record—Appendix, pp A34-A35, Jan 10, 1963 “Current Communist Goals” Hon. A.S. Herlong, Jr.)
Concerning ''right to privacy,'' Rich Lowry wrote: “Privacy (has) functioned as a euphemism for immunity from…public morals laws deemed by…justices to reflect benighted moral views,” wrote scholars Robert P. George and David L. Tubbs. From a right…to obtain contraceptives, it has evolved into a constitutional right of homosexuals to engage in sodomy and then the right of ‘gays’ to marry in a 2003 Massachusetts Supreme Court decision.” (Rich Lowry, “Out of Nothing at All: the Myth of a Right to Privacy” www.nationalreview.com 2005)
It was the infamous Lawrence v. Texas ruling which ''liberated'' people from morality-induced shame in order that they could give into the dark impulses of sodomy. The damage did not stop there though, for this ruling was based on references to the European Court of Human Rights and other foreign examples of ''emerging awareness'' about sex. Thus leftist activist judges on the United States Supreme Court did an end-run around America’s constitutional processes thereby cobbling our nation to an ever-growing matrix of emerging universal procedures, which is the goal of the left.
Likewise insightful is the fact that Lambda Legal, the counterfeit civil rights group that represented the ''gay'' plaintiffs in the Lawrence case is a communist front group. They can be found on the Communist Party USA website at: www.cpusa.org Click on ''weblinks,'' then on the category ''civil rights.'' You will see Lambda Legal along with the ACLU and other names familiar to you.
These factors: gross ignorance, self-absorption, multiculturalism, hedonism, and political correctness have allowed the left to entangle the United States in an ever-growing network of international treaties, global laws, and other institutions. If this socially destructive process is not stopped, it will have the same debilitating effect upon America’s sovereignty, Rule of Law, and Constitution as multicultural tribalism, hate laws, and political correctness have upon our inalienable rights.
Former president Bill Clinton once boasted to the United Nations that he was forcing the United States into a “web of institutions and arrangements” for “the emerging international system.”
Chief among the ''institutions'' is UNESCO. It’s obvious from a cursory reading of UNESCO’s ''Declaration of Principles on Tolerance'' that its definition of ''tolerance'' motivates the left’s increasingly virulent accusations of hate, which they level constantly against conservatives. UNESCO’s new global standard clearly calls for a politically correct sort of tolerance. Just as clearly, it permits no tolerance for Christian-Judeo moral principles and absolutes. By UNESCO’s standards, our founders would be charged with hateful intolerance.
The following are some excerpts:
Tolerance is respect, acceptance and appreciation of the…diversity of our world’s cultures…it is not only a moral duty, it is…a political and legal requirement. (Note: read “The Marquis de Sade: Left’s Man of Diverse Sexual Orientations” for a clear understanding of what we will be duty bound to tolerate and appreciate) Tolerance involves the rejection of dogmatism and absolutism. (code for Christianity and Orthodox Judaism)
Tolerance…means that one’s views are not to be imposed on others. (code for: not only may you not make moral judgments, but neither may you possess a conscience) Intolerance…is a global threat. (Source: www.unesco.org/tolerance/declaeng )
So what’s the true “global threat?” It’s dissent against the left’s new global standards. Only in the darkened hearts and minds of Promethean Leftists will the new world system be a heaven-on-earth utopia. For the rest of mankind it will be nothing less than a totalitarian hell-on-earth.
About the Writer: Linda Kimball is a writer and author of numerous articles and essays on culture, politics, and world view. Linda receives e-mail at LindyKimball@msn.com.
"leftists were able to introduce communist multiculturalism and political correctness into America’s culture, politics, academia, entertainment, and information dissemination venues."
This is so telling, and as true as anything I have read on the subject. No person can read the communist manifesto and not see the gains communism has made in this country, as well as the projection they use to make it appear otherwise. American needs to take back it's country, before it's too late.
AKA "the big plan",that I often refer to........and that people are coming to understand nowdays!!
October 17, 1997--Buenos Aires
There - fixed the typo.
Yep, and keep an eye on the UN and EU.
Yes, that is the next step after hedonistic anarchy - totalitarianism.
Absolutely.
*
IMO, the article is quite right in pointing out that things like drug use, free love, homosexuality, etc. have been maliciously promoted by the Left. 'Course this was not done by them through any love of hedonism or individual freedoms, but in an effort to damage the basic building block of our civilization, the American family.
Those things are in no way truly leftist values, though, they are only being used by the Left as tools. The main suckers are those who call themselves liberals. They would not likely be tolerated very long in a completely socialist society, which would be totalitarian by nature.
However, I'd like to respectfully point out that such basic things as the freedom of choice and the right to privacy from government intrusion, which were disparaged by the author, are intrinsic not only to libertarian philosophy, but to the American ideal of freedom.
The words "choice" and "privacy" are used by liberals/leftists as code words that really mean something else to them.
"Choice" means "killing unborn babies" and "privacy" means "promotion of sodomy" or even "sodomy on the street/in the park/at the beach/in the public toilet".
Real choice and privacy - within legal and philosophical limits as delineated in the Constitution - is vital. But leftists don't mean real choice or real privacy. They're just codewords to them.
It's a diversion, divide and conquer. The internet really has the powers that be spooked, because you don't have to be a billionaire to get a big following or launch a big movement. It hasn't happened yet but it's bound to when things get bad enough.
You are correct, the culprits in misusing the terms are the leftists; I must be in a dense mood tonight, of course "pro choice" means pro abortion - not much choice for the baby (whose body, through fantastic mental contortion, is considered to be a part of a woman's body) is there?
I actually have strong libertarian feelings and ideals, but also am a respecter of traditions since most exist for good reason (such as preservation of family), so I tend to have mixed feelings on some of these issues.
I'm not too sure that the Constitution delineates privacy or choice, except through its negative nature, which does not give central authority over such things to government.
If the fedgov did not overstep its actual authority, we wouldn't have much of the problems we have today.
Thanks for the reply. I agree.
Unfortunately, I think it's a lost cause, barring some kind of unforseen intervention.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.