Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Evidence for Universe Expansion Found
Yahoo (AP) ^ | 3/16/2006 | MATT CRENSON

Posted on 03/16/2006 11:31:54 AM PST by The_Victor

Physicists announced Thursday that they now have the smoking gun that shows the universe went through extremely rapid expansion in the moments after the big bang, growing from the size of a marble to a volume larger than all of observable space in less than a trillion-trillionth of a second.

The discovery — which involves an analysis of variations in the brightness of microwave radiation — is the first direct evidence to support the two-decade-old theory that the universe went through what is called inflation.

It also helps explain how matter eventually clumped together into planets, stars and galaxies in a universe that began as a remarkably smooth, superhot soup.

"It's giving us our first clues about how inflation took place," said Michael Turner, assistant director for mathematics and physical sciences at the National Science Foundation. "This is absolutely amazing."

Brian Greene, a Columbia University physicist, said: "The observations are spectacular and the conclusions are stunning."

Researchers found the evidence for inflation by looking at a faint glow that permeates the universe. That glow, known as the cosmic microwave background, was produced when the universe was about 300,000 years old — long after inflation had done its work.

But just as a fossil tells a paleontologist about long-extinct life, the pattern of light in the cosmic microwave background offers clues about what came before it. Of specific interest to physicists are subtle brightness variations that give images of the microwave background a lumpy appearance.

Physicists presented new measurements of those variations during a news conference at Princeton University. The measurements were made by a spaceborne instrument called the Wilkinson Microwave Anistropy Probe, or WMAP, launched by NASA in 2001.

Earlier studies of WMAP data have determined that the universe is 13.7 billion years old, give or take a few hundred thousand years. WMAP also measured variations in the cosmic microwave background so huge that they stretch across the entire sky. Those earlier observations are strong indicators of inflation, but no smoking gun, said Turner, who was not involved in the research.

The new analysis looked at variations in the microwave background over smaller patches of sky — only billions of light-years across, instead of hundreds of billions.

Without inflation, the brightness variations over small patches of the sky would be the same as those observed over larger areas of the heavens. But the researchers found considerable differences in the brightness variations.

"The data favors inflation," said Charles Bennett, a Johns Hopkins University physicist who announced the discovery. He was joined by two Princeton colleagues, Lyman Page and David Spergel, who also contributed to the research.

Bennett added: "It amazes me that we can say anything at all about what transpired in the first trillionth of a second of the universe."

The physicists said small lumps in the microwave background began during inflation. Those lumps eventually coalesced into stars, galaxies and planets.

The measurements are scheduled to be published in a future issue of the Astrophysical Journal.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cosmology; crevolist; expansion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 841-851 next last
To: MineralMan
Hah! Space is just the training wheels. Time is for midshipmen. Space-time is ...

Well, I still have trouble with that one.

81 posted on 03/16/2006 12:27:45 PM PST by VadeRetro (I have the updated "Your brain on creationism" on my homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: beezdotcom

......your attention, please.........Elvis has left the Universe..........


82 posted on 03/16/2006 12:28:13 PM PST by Red Badger (And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty
Doesn't that violate the law that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light?

No. Space is expanding, but the objects (mass) in space do not move.

83 posted on 03/16/2006 12:28:29 PM PST by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

No, momentum is defined as equal to sqrt(E^2-m^2*c^4)/c where m is the rest mass, E is the energy and c is the speed of light. Note that you can get a momentum out of something if m equals 0 and E does not equal 0.


84 posted on 03/16/2006 12:28:29 PM PST by Netheron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
"Physicists announced Thursday that they now have the smoking gun that shows the universe went through extremely rapid expansion in the moments after the big bang, growing from the size of a marble to a volume larger than all of observable space in less than a trillion-trillionth of a second."

The visible universe is more than 1 light year large (to put it mildly). Moving more than 1 light year in less time than 1 year would put a damper on every scientist who claims day in and day out that you can't accelerate mass faster than the Speed of Light.

85 posted on 03/16/2006 12:28:52 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker; Red Badger; ahayes; Physicist
What is it expanding into?..........

The correct answer is: We don't know what, if anything, and can't even begin to venture much of an educated guess. String theory, however, would seem to suggest that our universe can be imagined as one of many, like bubbles in a froth, and as each expands (or contracts) it 'merely' inflates or conflates the froth. Now, if that's true, what, if anything, the bubbly froth is expanding into is a whole 'nother topic!

86 posted on 03/16/2006 12:30:18 PM PST by AntiGuv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

It is faster than the speed of light--which is why "expansion" is controversial.

Some physicists speculate that the speed of light has been slowing down since the Big Bang.


87 posted on 03/16/2006 12:30:39 PM PST by DJtex (;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

It's pumped down to a rather lousy vacuum (about 10-100mTorr I'm guessing). The mean free path of the molecules is on the order of the bulb size, but they are still in there.


88 posted on 03/16/2006 12:30:53 PM PST by Netheron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro

Space is the absence of gravity. Gravity is the absence of space. Time is the absence of?................vacations......


89 posted on 03/16/2006 12:31:35 PM PST by Red Badger (And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

Whip inflation now!

90 posted on 03/16/2006 12:31:57 PM PST by isthisnickcool (Jack Bauer: "By the time I'm finished with you you're going to wish you felt this good again".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
[ It's a Hindu thing. You wouldn't understand. ]

You mean Buddhist..

91 posted on 03/16/2006 12:32:04 PM PST by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Hayzo

It is not expanding into anything because as far as we know there is nothing other than the universe.

It is simply expanding to a bigger universe.


92 posted on 03/16/2006 12:32:30 PM PST by Mikey_1962 (I grew up in a slum, when I got to college it had become a "ghetto".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

What was it when it was the size of a marble?


93 posted on 03/16/2006 12:32:31 PM PST by tom paine 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Netheron
http://online.cctt.org/physicslab/content/PhyAPB/lessonnotes/dualnature/Compton.asp

p = h/l

94 posted on 03/16/2006 12:33:43 PM PST by VadeRetro (I have the updated "Your brain on creationism" on my homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

Crooke's Radiometer

95 posted on 03/16/2006 12:34:14 PM PST by guitar4jesus (Black Conservative . . . I think, I vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: tom paine 2

Very crowded...........


96 posted on 03/16/2006 12:34:22 PM PST by Red Badger (And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
"No, it's really the space expanding."

That raisins in taffy theory of physics doesn't explain why "inflation" stopped (or slowed), much less why the universe is still expanding at ever-faster rates, much less why different laws of physics existed back then (e.g. accelerating large masses vastly faster than the speed of light C).

Which is to say, it's a bunch of hooey.

97 posted on 03/16/2006 12:34:24 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
growing from the size of a marble to a volume larger than all of observable space in less than a trillion-trillionth of a second.

So this means that "C" has not always been the universal speed limit.

98 posted on 03/16/2006 12:35:23 PM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (Crime cannot be tolerated. Criminals thrive on the indulgences of society's understanding.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: guitar4jesus; Netheron; The_Victor
Wikipedia article on the radiometer
99 posted on 03/16/2006 12:36:32 PM PST by Virginia-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Southack
As usual, your Nobel awaits if only you would publish in a peer-reviewed journal so the house of cards which is non-Southack science would know to collapse.
100 posted on 03/16/2006 12:36:39 PM PST by VadeRetro (I have the updated "Your brain on creationism" on my homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 841-851 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson