Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China to create Aircraft Carrier fleet: Report
India Defence ^

Posted on 03/14/2006 1:43:37 AM PST by Dyaus Pitar

Hong Kong: The Chinese military is currently planning to build an aircraft carrier, a pro-Beijing daily in Hong Kong reported Friday.

"The Chinese army will conduct research and build an aircraft carrier and develop our own aircraft carrier fleet," People’s Liberation Army Lt. Gen. Wang Zhiyuan was quoted as saying in the Chinese-language Wen Wei Po.

"An aircraft carrier is a very important tool for big countries defending their interests in the sea. China is a big country with a long shoreline. An aircraft carrier is necessary to defend our interests in the sea," he said.

It would be China's first aircraft carrier and would likely be deployed to join other warships currently in the South China Sea, the newspaper said.

(Excerpt) Read more at india-defence.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aircrafcarrier; armsbuildup; china; chinesemilitary; submarinechow; target
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last
To: nunoste
not to mention their advances in astrology, weaponry, fine clothing, war tactics etc. The Chinese made ships that would embarrass anything the Western world was capable of making for centuries. Their political culture isn't particularly suited for a modern world, which is why they have done so poorly in the last few centuries, but as someone else said, these folks have been around as a cohesive society for thousands of years. A few hundred years of playing second fiddle to a Western upstart, such as the United States, is but a blip on their radar screen.

They built a Great Wall...but was that to keep others out or keep their own people in?

21 posted on 03/14/2006 3:10:41 AM PST by FDNYRHEROES (Always bring a liberal to a gunfight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Dyaus Pitar

Hopefully they do it about as well as france.
Can't do any worse.


22 posted on 03/14/2006 3:23:47 AM PST by Joe Boucher (an enemy of islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ronin

China already has an aircraft carrier, it bought the Varyig from the russian commies. Oh wait, it was just sitting there rusting since the chicoms couldnt figure out how to make it work, so they turned it into a hotel iirc. On a serious note, it took a Briton who invented the steam catapult to finally allow the USA to make its dominant carrier fleet of today. Point being that building a modern carrier requires the confluence of many industries and chicoms are not there yet. All this aside, carriers are actually a quickly fading asset in relation to tomorrows conflicts. We simply will not send one into the strait of hormuz out of fear of losing one. They are good and still extremely usefull, but their time is coming to an end.


23 posted on 03/14/2006 3:23:53 AM PST by son of caesar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Einigkeit_Recht_Freiheit
One doesn't just build an aircraft carrier, one builds a carrier group.

Actually, they'd have to build 3 carrier groups if they wanted to have one available constantly. Pretty darn expensive. At best (worst), that doesn't look to be happening before 2020 or so.

24 posted on 03/14/2006 3:30:53 AM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dyaus Pitar

Right now, the LAST thing we need to face is a Chinese navy filled with aircraft carriers bought and paid for by Americans courtesy of "globalization".

A lot of folks here are scoffing at the notion of Chinese carriers - I wouldn't. We could well be seeing the beginnings of the next "Cold War".

It will be more dangerous with the Chinese than the last one was with the Soviets.


25 posted on 03/14/2006 3:54:06 AM PST by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment

I don't really buy the argument that the Chinese will be more dangerous than the Soviets, at least not yet. They have a long way to go before that becomes a possibilty and the Chinese government isn't likely to retain its current form given the societal changes that are required for it to compete against the US.

Time will tell though.


26 posted on 03/14/2006 4:16:04 AM PST by nunoste
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: King Prout

In the current age, a carrier without an effective missile defense is simply a future barrier reef.


27 posted on 03/14/2006 4:32:35 AM PST by thoughtomator (Nobody would have cared if the UAE wanted to buy Macy's...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dyaus Pitar

We should sell 'em a demilitarized Enterprise. The Chicoms will go broke trying to make it work, and creating an air group for it.


28 posted on 03/14/2006 10:57:32 AM PST by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment
A lot of folks here are scoffing at the notion of Chinese carriers - I wouldn't. We could well be seeing the beginnings of the next "Cold War".

I agree. That said, they are a good 15-20 years off before they could field anything on the order of one of our carried battle groups. They could put something out there that looks like what we've got, but in terms of acquiring the human experience and expertise, they've got a long road ahead of them.

Best to keep an eye on them for now and keep upgrading our own stuff.
29 posted on 03/14/2006 11:05:27 AM PST by Antoninus (The only reason you're alive today is because your parents were pro-life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Dyaus Pitar

And of course the carrier will be outfitted with a stolen American Aegis battle management system. So much of the tech for a carrier group will likely be stolen from the US, you might as well just paint a freaking American flag on the thing.


30 posted on 03/14/2006 11:05:56 AM PST by domenad (In all things, in all ways, at all times, let honor guide me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thud

A Chi com carrier is just two tomahawks away from being an attraction for scuba divers.


31 posted on 03/14/2006 11:08:13 AM PST by Armedanddangerous (Master of Sinanju (Emeritus))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Dyaus Pitar

Someone tell me again that story about how free countries never go to war. Something about China and free do not seem to me to ever belong in the same sentence.


32 posted on 03/14/2006 11:08:35 AM PST by jeremiah (How much did we get for that rope?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dyaus Pitar

33 posted on 03/14/2006 11:10:30 AM PST by bondjamesbond (RICE '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ronin

I've seen their battleship.

34 posted on 03/14/2006 11:13:24 AM PST by azhenfud (He who always is looking up seldom finds others' lost change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dyaus Pitar

Click on the Logo above for info on how Red China is rapidly growing its modern navy.

35 posted on 03/14/2006 11:13:58 AM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carumba
"Nobody gets in an inner tube and paddles like crazy to get to a communist country."

Though I'd pay good money to see Ward Churchill and Cindy Sheehan dogpaddle to Cuba.
36 posted on 03/14/2006 11:14:05 AM PST by GAB-1955 (being dragged, kicking and screaming, into the Kingdom of Heaven....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Dyaus Pitar

Now, I'm far from an expert in modern military affairs, but it seems to me that he who has the most, and most accurate guided missles, rules the roost.

Even as a thousand Communist Chinese Sunburns and Yakhonts can blow our carriers out of the Taiwan Straits, surely we'll always have enough missles to sink all their ships, right down to the clunkiest little junk.


37 posted on 03/14/2006 11:14:43 AM PST by warchild9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American in Israel
This aircraft carrier is to protect the invasion fleet.

If the near-term objective is to unify with Taiwan, land-based aircraft are the cheaper way to go and would do the job nicely. An aircraft carrier would be a huge investment to risk losing when it only marginally contributes to the invasion operations.

Now, if we're talking about dominating the South China Sea -- that's a different ballgame.

38 posted on 03/14/2006 11:15:29 AM PST by Tallguy (When it's a bet between reality and delusion, bet on reality -- Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: GAB-1955
Though I'd pay good money to see Ward Churchill and Cindy Sheehan dogpaddle to Cuba.

I volunteer to man the chum bucket on the escort boat...

39 posted on 03/14/2006 11:19:49 AM PST by Tallguy (When it's a bet between reality and delusion, bet on reality -- Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy
I don't know what this is, or even if it is real. The web page was in Chinese, and I don't read Chinese.

But, there you go.

40 posted on 03/14/2006 11:23:15 AM PST by bondjamesbond (RICE '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson