Posted on 03/12/2006 3:41:52 PM PST by mr_hammer
In a break from his past, President Bush now embraces the idea of globalization and speaks against the dangers of isolationism... Developing...
Who argues 'America only'? We've always had trade. It hasn't been 'fair or free' for awhile, though.
Hmm? What now? He's going to send all our factories to China, all our jobs to India, and cede our land to Mexico?
Oh, that's right. He's already done all that.
When was the last empire, excepting those gained for a few years through military action?
Facts have no place here. ;-)
Good Buchanites have their propaganda down, but exposing facts that contradict the propaganda is too much to ask them to reconcile.
But, you are deadly accurate in the last one. Can't imagine how a true "Globalist" could have screwed up so royally in selecting two Justices that reject foreign law. Once could be a mistake. But twice? :-)
As well that pesky Bolton he even circumvented Congress and Voinovich's weeping out there to give us a voice. Must have been an off day for the "Globalist".
GITMO is still up and running, despite the world's opinions...
He left the U.N. out when he "unilaterally" decided how to get help to the Tsunami victims quickly, only a few pals invited in there. A real Globalist really should have let people die until the WORLD was onboard.
Geez, Bush is giving his "globalist" image a bad rep with these actions and more.
It's Sunday night. Drudge has nothing better to do.
How did you slip through the cracks? Turn yourself in.
It has been tried by us before. It didn't work out too well that time either!
LLS
To paraphrase Patton - ''That's what happens when you stop being an American and start being a globalist.''
bttt
W's style is not Globalization European style. It is Capitalistic Style Globalization. A very big difference for now and the future!
I would certainly hope Bush embraces globalization -- along with anyone else who has even the slightest grasp on economics.
I forgot about that one :-)
Why does it have to be either or?
Free trade is essential to our economic health.
Free tradin' away our technology, wealth, and production to "developing countries" for ideological and "cheap" labor purposes suck.
Yep. You are bang-on the gong right.
Doesn't suck at all especially in comparison to the future wake-up smack Americans are going to get when they realize there is no SOCIAL SECURITY net. The Ponzi Scheme, formerly called, Social Security is right on track to run out while everyone's screamin' and hollerin' about the evils of "globalization".
And President Bush has done an outstanding job of standing for American sovereignty. We don't have to surrender to UN one-world socialists in order to compete in the world's markets. In fact, that would be stupid.
"Hmm? What now? He's going to send all our factories to China, all our jobs to India, and cede our land to Mexico?"
I have to say that I expected Bush to correct more of this non-sense... but it has been going on long before he got into office. Where we really lack true leadership is in the houses of congress.
I don't think you have a full picture on your story line analysis.
Huh!!? What is Drudge going to report next? Water is now wet!!?
President Bush has always been a globalist.
Both of them!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.