Posted on 03/11/2006 12:30:59 PM PST by Stoat
Fury at Churchill statue |
|||||
|
|||||
By JOHN TROUP THE family of war hero Winston Churchill yesterday slammed a statue of him in a STRAITJACKET. MP Nicholas Soames his grandson said: Its not only insulting, its pathetic. Churchill is known to have suffered periods of depression which he called his black dog. And the charity Rethink put the lifesize statue on display in Norwich yesterday to symbolise how the mentally ill are stigmatised by society. But Mr Soames said: This is probably a good cause in search of publicity and they have let some idiot ruin their case. It is grossly offensive to Sir Winston and his millions of admirers. And World War II veteran Captain John Nunnely MBE, 83, said: I am appalled to think that the 20th centurys greatest leader is being treated like this. Churchills family objected to the statue when it was planned. But the charity went ahead anyway. A spokeswoman said: Churchill was a great leader and this is an illustration of what people with mental illness can achieve. But one visitor to Norwichs Forum centre said: Its wrong. Winston was a great man, whatever his mental problems were. |
They're sick in the head.
We don't have a monopoly on historical idiots.
A "Mohammed in a straitjacket" statue would of course be a delightful addition to the cultural and civic landscape, and one that I would be proud to support in a pecuniary sense. Not only would it be a far more accurate depiction of it's subject than the hideous insult that is the subject of this thread but it would also show the Religion of Peace in all it's glory. The massive riots, destruction and mass-murder that would be unleashed from the "Islamic World" would make the Cartoon Jihad look like child's play. Anyone still not convinced of the utterly dysfunctional nature of Islam at it's core would be quickly educated.
I would be delighted to assist with the legal procurement of such a vehicle...civic renovation in this context is a truly worthy cause that I would be proud to support.
I see your point but I would suggest that it could also be argued that there was simply an interest in protecting his dignity and his privacy in the matter of Roosevelt's very real condition.
In this case, they are taking what was most likely a comparatively minor affliction of a man far more deserving of respect than most others in the entire 20th century and magnifying it beyond anything even vaguely resembling the truth....they are fabricating a lie that will be looked upon by schoolchildren and those not familiar with history as a truthful depiction of how Churchill really was..
It is a crime against Sir Winston's memory, his family, the entire Nation of Great Britain and all of Western culture, as we are all perpetually indebted to Sir Winston Churchill.
They're sick in the head.
And they insist that everyone else in the world be insulted by their sickness.
Art ping.
Let Sam Cree, Woofie, or me know if you want on or off this art ping list.
I think this is a travesty and a lie. It is an example of the left twisting the truth for political benefit, something that is happening more and more in this world. What is appalling is that the left doesn't even realize the lie.
It would be one thing if Churchill had ever been so restrained in a strait jacket. This is one case of destroying art that I might even favor.
The most annoying thing about dadaism, is that it works.
Sometimes, I wish I knew how to "modify" certain sites.
My definition of Dada is irrational art from WWI. Maybe you have a different definition. This work of Churchill is just another way to "decontexturalize" (to dethrone and mock) a great hero.
Melt it down.
exactly like this statue.
Interesting word: Da·da or da·da
n : A European artistic and literary movement (1916-1923) that flouted conventional aesthetic and cultural values by producing works marked by nonsense, travesty, and incongruity.
n : a nihilistic art movement (especially in painting) that flourished in Europe early in the 20th century; based on irrationality and negation of the accepted laws of beauty
Sir Winston was, for a public figure, a very private man. I am wondering if the organizers ever thought that they were exploiting him in a way that would have humiliated him (and frankly if they put up a statue of me in a straight-jacket, it would humiliate me.)
McVey
This is also pointing to what the left is willing to do to advance an agenda. If someone is useful, even if by distortation and by violating the most basic sense of common decency, they use them.
McVey
Once we turn individuals into tools, we have returned to ages far darker than we have ever known.
Until this moment I never really gauged the left's cruelty or recklessness. They have done enough. Have they no sense of decency?
A paraphrase of course.
McVey
"Just don't say anything against muslims, jews or arabs and you are fine." I ask again...Explain what you mean...And why do you address me with this question...Don't recoil...Back it up with a response please. You don't know me and I don't know you,PLEASE BE BIG ENOUGH TO EXPLAIN YOUR STATEMENT.Drive by comment shootings are so childish...
Well, it appears that one popular method is to get a giant, industrial-sized backhoe and attach a huge iron ball to it via a chain. Raising the backhoe's bucket causes the ball to rise above the ground, and thereby becomes a delightfully effective instrument of semi-controlled mayhem, suitable for all manner of civic renovation including the removal of insulting statues.
I'm certain that your local neighborhood backhoe dealer can put you in touch with the appropriate licensing and certification agencies that will get you squared away as a legal wrecking ball operator in no time. :-)
Apparently the so called "Brains" in this nutty operation are suffering greatly from some sort of terrible mental illness themselves.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.