Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New photo resparks 'Noah's Ark mania'
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | March 10, 2006 1:00 a.m. Eastern | Joe Kovacs

Posted on 03/09/2006 11:30:41 PM PST by Tim Long

Digital image of 'Ararat Anomaly' has researchers taking closer look

A new, high-resolution digital image of what has become known as the "Ararat Anomaly" is reigniting interest in the hunt for Noah's Ark.

Satellite image of 'Ararat Anomaly,' taken by DigitalGlobe's QuickBird Satellite in 2003 and now made public for the first time (courtesy: DigitalGlobe)

The location of the anomaly on the northwest corner of Mt. Ararat in eastern Turkey has been under investigation from afar by ark hunters for years, but it has remained unexplored, with the government of Turkey not granting any scientific expedition permission to explore on site.

But the detail revealed by the new photo from DigitalGlobe's QuickBird satellite has a man at the helm of the probe excited once again.

"I've got new found optimism ... as far as my continuing push to have the intelligence community declassify some of the more definitive-type imagery," Porcher Taylor, an associate professor in paralegal studies at the University of Richmond, told Space.com.

For more than three decades, Taylor has been a national security analyst, and has also served as a senior associate for five years at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) in Washington, D.C.

"I'm calling this my satellite archaeology project," Taylor said.

Space.com reports the project has been combining the photographic resources of QuickBird with GeoEye's Ikonos spacecraft, Canada's Radarsat 1, as well as declassified aerial and satellite images snapped by U.S. intelligence agencies.

While it's quite possible the item of interest could simply be a natural ridge of rock, snow and ice, Taylor says there's also a chance it could be something manmade.

"I had no preconceived notions or agendas when I began this in 1993 as to what I was looking for," he said. "I maintain that if it is the remains of something manmade and potentially nautical, then it's potentially something of biblical proportions."

The anomaly remains ensconced in glacial ice at an altitude of 15,300 feet, and Taylor says the photos suggest it's length-to-width ratio is close to 6:1, as indicated in the Book of Genesis.

The U.S. Air Force took the first photographs of the Mt. Ararat site in 1949. The images allegedly revealed what seemed to be a structure covered by ice, but were held for years in a confidential file labeled "Ararat Anomaly."

The new image was actually taken in 2003, but has never been revealed to the public until now.

Arking up the wrong tree?

Meanwhile, there are others who believe Noah's Ark has already been found, and tourists can actually visit it on a mountain next to Ararat.

Some believe this is Noah's Ark, already found on a mountain next to Mt. Ararat (courtesy: wyattmuseum.com)

The late Ron Wyatt, whose Tennessee-based foundation, Wyatt Archaeological Research, purported the ark has already been found at Dogubayazit, Turkey, some 12-15 miles from Ararat, noting Genesis states the ark rested "upon the mountains of Ararat," not mountain.

Is this a hair from a large cat aboard Noah's Ark? (photo: Richard Rives, wyattmuseum.com)

Wyatt's website is filled with on-location photographs and charts promoting its case with physical evidence including radar scans of bulkheads on the alleged vessel, deck timber and iron rivets, large "drogue" stones which are thought to have acted as types of anchors, and even some animal hair inside, possibly from a large cat like a lion or tiger.

A flood of doubt

However, there's been no shortage of critics from both scientific and Christian circles who think the Dogubayazit site is erroneous.

Lorence Collins, a retired geology professor from California State University, Northridge, joined the late David Fasold, a one-time proponent of the Wyatt site, in writing a scientific summary claiming the location is "bogus."

"Evidence from microscopic studies and photo analyses demonstrates that the supposed Ark near Dogubayazit is a completely natural rock formation," said the 1996 paper published in the Journal of Geoscience Education. "It cannot have been Noah's Ark nor even a man-made model. It is understandable why early investigators falsely identified it."

The Answers in Genesis website provides an in-depth report attempting to debunk any validity the Dogubayazit site has, and concludes by stating:

"[A]s Christians we need to always exercise due care when claims are made, no matter who makes them, and any claims must always be subjected to the most rigorous scientific scrutiny. If that had happened here, and particularly if the scientific surveys conducted by highly qualified professionals using sophisticated instruments had been more widely publicized and their results taken note of, then these claims would never have received the widespread credence that they have."

Officials with Wyatt Archaeological Research remain unfazed in the face of such criticism.

"The site ... is actually something that you can look at. Not some made up story that no one is quite able to reach but something that is really there," said president Richard Rives. "It is a 'boat-shaped object' composed of material containing organic carbon, which is what is found in petrified wood. ...

"While there is more research that needs to be done at the site, there is a substantial amount of evidence that would indicate that the Wyatt site is not a natural object. ...

"Today, everyone wants to tell us how to think. We, at Wyatt Archaeological Research, do not do that. We just present the evidence that we have and let each individual make his own decision."

In both the Old and New Testaments, the Bible speaks of Noah and the ark, and Jesus Christ and the apostles Paul and Peter all make reference to Noah's flood as an actual historical event.

'Noah's Ark' by Pennsylvania artist Edward Hicks, 1846

According to Genesis, Noah was a righteous man who was instructed by God to construct a large vessel to hold his family and many species of animals, as a massive deluge was coming to purify the world which had become corrupt.

Genesis 6:5 states: "And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually."

Noah was told by God to take aboard seven pairs of each of the "clean" animals – that is to say, those permissible to eat – and two each of the "unclean" variety. (Gen. 7:2)

Though the Bible says it rained for 40 days and 40 nights, it also mentions "the waters prevailed upon the earth a hundred and fifty days."

The ark then "rested" upon the mountains of Ararat, but it was still months before Noah and his family – his wife, his three sons and the sons' wives – were able to leave the ark and begin replenishing the world.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ararat; archaeology; crevolist; godsgravesglyphs; noah; noahsark; satellite
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-323 next last

1 posted on 03/09/2006 11:30:44 PM PST by Tim Long
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tim Long

It doesn't matter to me whether Noah's Ark is found or not. However, I am left wondering why photos of Mt.Ararat have been classified for so many years. Can anyone say, "information suppression"? Really, what is on Mt.Ararat that would be considered "classified"? The only answer that comes to my mind is that there are scientists and archeologists that do not want Noah's Ark found. I mean, how far would that set them and their theories back? We would see the world's best back pedalers in action.


2 posted on 03/09/2006 11:50:19 PM PST by taxesareforever (Government is running amuck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxesareforever

Scientists who wish to suppress the truth to protect their theories don't deserve the title.


3 posted on 03/09/2006 11:52:13 PM PST by RandallFlagg (Roll your own cigarettes! You'll save $$$ and smoke less!(Magnetic bumper stickers-click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: Tim Long
radar scans of bulkheads on the alleged vessel, deck timber and iron rivets

Iron? Meaning it was built during the Iron Age around 1300 BC.

5 posted on 03/10/2006 12:04:26 AM PST by razorback-bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxesareforever
I am left wondering why photos of Mt.Ararat have been classified for so many years. Can anyone say,

Because the paranoid government drones are afraid of inciting the paranoid tinfoil hat wearing Area 51 crowd...

One begets the other...

6 posted on 03/10/2006 12:06:51 AM PST by antaresequity (PUSH 1 FOR ENGLISH - PUSH 2 TO BE DEPORTED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: taxesareforever
" The only answer that comes to my mind is that there are scientists and archeologists that do not want Noah's Ark found. "

The most likely answer to come to my mind is that the level of detail in the photograph itself was what was classified- our technical ability.

7 posted on 03/10/2006 12:07:04 AM PST by de Buillion (Give us your perverts, pedophiles, and sodomites. San Francisco wants YOU!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tim Long

It's a rock cliff face.

8 posted on 03/10/2006 12:07:37 AM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tim Long
And Noah himself is on Mars, staring back at us...with his dead eyes.
9 posted on 03/10/2006 12:23:34 AM PST by planetesimal (All is flux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: de Buillion

When we continually hear that a license plate can be spotted from a satellite how much more detailed can anything get?


10 posted on 03/10/2006 12:25:57 AM PST by taxesareforever (Government is running amuck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls

That looks like Noah's submarine that was mentioned in one of the Dead Sea scrolls.


11 posted on 03/10/2006 12:28:52 AM PST by opinionator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls

It's a rock cliff face.



It's actually an anomaly of ice build-up in a freezer. That's an old french fry you're looking at.


12 posted on 03/10/2006 12:32:56 AM PST by sully777 (wWBBD: What would Brian Boitano do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: taxesareforever

It doesn't matter to me whether Noah's Ark is found or not. However, I am left wondering why photos of Mt.Ararat have been classified for so many years. Can anyone say, "information suppression"? Really, what is on Mt.Ararat that would be considered "classified"?



Just guessing: Mt Ararat is in Turkey. Spying on an ally may prove embarrassing. There may be military bases, or whatever. Just guessing why things are suppressed in a satellite picture.


13 posted on 03/10/2006 12:37:12 AM PST by sully777 (wWBBD: What would Brian Boitano do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tim Long
In 1990, when I was in Colorado Springs for a Board meeting for Nicky Cruz Outreach, I met Astronaut, Jim Irwin who lived next door to Nicky, and he was working with a group of people who found what they believed was the Ark and from what this sounds like, it was about this same area. I saw satellite pictures of it, and it definitely looks like it could have been a large boat. It's in ice, but you can make out the image. He was so excited to talk about it. The man walked on the moon, but he was more excited about the Ark than the moon. lol A few years later Jim died of a heart attack and I don't know what happened to their project. I guess it could even be some of these people that he was working with. He said the government of Turkey would not let anyone go up the mountain back then, so it sounds like nothing has changed.
14 posted on 03/10/2006 12:47:39 AM PST by NRA2BFree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tim Long

Can't someone just fly a helicopter up there and see what the hell the deal is?


15 posted on 03/10/2006 12:52:32 AM PST by Pro-Bush (The world is full of kings and queens who blind your eyes and steal your dreams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tim Long

The largest climatic disaster in history wasn't caused by global warming, it was caused by global wickedness. When sin is removed from man's nature, so will every problem and disaster we currently deal with.


16 posted on 03/10/2006 1:00:57 AM PST by HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath (My Homeland Security: Isaiah 54:17 No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tim Long
The Yetis know where it is.

But they're not allowed to say.

17 posted on 03/10/2006 1:04:03 AM PST by WestVirginiaRebel (The U.N. is an enabler of all things evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath
One possible source for the Flood story.
18 posted on 03/10/2006 1:12:53 AM PST by WestVirginiaRebel (The U.N. is an enabler of all things evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel
I saw a documentary about the Black Sea flood a few years back, very interesting but not the Biblical Flood.

http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2/4377news9-14-2000.asp

"The Bible says that Noah’s Flood was global, but the Black Sea flood was only local. The Bible says the Flood covered the highest mountains, but the Black Sea flood only rose by a few hundred feet. It didn’t even cover the mountains in the local area. The Bible says that Noah built an Ark, but the Black Sea flood needed no such vessel. The water came up so slowly that the residents would have walked to higher land. The Bible says that everyone outside the Ark drowned, but the Black Sea flood simply displaced the residents. The Bible says that only the animals and birds on the Ark survived, but not so with the local Black Sea flood. The Bible says there was forty days of rain, but the Black Sea flood had no rain. The Bible says that the Flood ended when the waters went down and land was dry. But the waters of the Black Sea flood have not gone down yet. The list could go on. There is absolutely no resemblance whatever between the Black Sea flood and the biblical Flood of Noah."

19 posted on 03/10/2006 2:12:09 AM PST by protest1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: razorback-bert

The IRON AGE has nothing to do with the discovery of Iron, it is called the IRON AGE because of the relationship of what countries are world powers compared to the prophecies in Daniel and what Nebudchannezer's dream was:

Gold = Babylon
Silver = medio-Persia
Bronze = Greece
Iron = Rome


20 posted on 03/10/2006 2:34:16 AM PST by RaceBannon ((Prov 28:1 KJV) The wicked flee when no man pursueth: but the righteous are bold as a lion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-323 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson