Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

V: For Vendetta (Debbie Schlussel Updated Review Alert)
Debbie Schlussel.com ^ | 03/08/06 | Debbie Schlussel

Posted on 03/08/2006 7:18:00 AM PST by goldstategop

[Note: You may perceive some of this column as a "spoiler".]

If you liked the politics of last weekend's Oscar nominees, you'll love "V for Vendetta."

It's an exciting, quality Bin Laden film.

But if you're like the rest of mainstream America--you support our troops, believe in firmly responding to terrorists on our own shores, and/or respect Christianity--then, don't waste your time at this piece of garbage masquerading as a superhero movie. It is anything but.

If most other Hollywood films subtly whisper of an agenda, "V" clocks you over the head with it with a still sizzling, iron frying pan of extreme leftism. It doesn't arrive in theaters until March 17, but already the mainstream (ie. liberal) movie critics and entertainment media are raving about this egregious attack on our war on terror.

"V for Vendetta"
Natalie Portman, Guy Fawkes Mask-wearing "V" Are Terrorist Heroes Based on the graphic novel series of the same name, "V" comes complete with all the bogeymen the far left loves to hate: NSA spying and wiretaps; government renditions and torture complete with Abu Ghraib hood fashions; lecherous, elderly Christian clerics in collars raping young girls; Islam, gay rights, and free speech under attack; and even a Bill O'Reilly-esque evil cable talk show host/wicked pharmaceutical billionaire/heinous military officer combo rolled into one character.

Oh, and by the way, the hero of the movie: He's a terrorist in a Guy Fawkes mask, who blows up important government buildings. Sound familiar? His mask might as well be a kefiyeh wrapped around his head in a Nick Berg video.

The movie takes place in futuristic England, and there is only one American star (Natalie Portman). But it's quite clear to whom the "commentary" is directed: Joe and Jane American. When this movie takes place, "the United States of America" doesn't exist anymore. America is in the midst of a civil war.

And America and the war on Iraq are the enemies--along with Christians and the right--in this movie. We are treated to newscasts about how "America's War [on terror] spread to England." One character--a gay, British Jay Leno type who hosts a latenight show--keeps a secret vault of prohibited items, including a giant poster of "the Coalition of the Willing," depicting the American and British flags surrounding a swastika. Think about our troops fighting and dying in Iraq, before you decide to give your dollars to this film. Do you really think they are Nazis?

Also in the secret vault of sacred prohibited items: a Koran. Portman, whose Evie is the "heroine" of "V," asks, why the Koran? "Are you a Muslim?" she asks the late-night host. "No, but its [the Koran's] images are beautiful." Then he comments about how he can be executed for possessing the Koran. (Not a peep in this film about the thousands who've been executed in the name of the Koran and "its beautiful images.")

Puh-leeze. If anything, both Britain and the U.S. have bent over backwards not only for the Koran, but for its extremist Muslim followers. Where Christian displays are absolutely forbidden in any schools, despite so-called "freedom of speech"; where Ten Commandments are removed from the Alabama Supreme Court, despite their being the basis for our legal system; children are required to learn about Islam, read from the Koran, and behave as Muslims in elementary schools, in the name of "tolerance" and "education."

In "V", while Islam and the Koran are treasured but prohibited, Christianity is pure evil. Nice juxtaposition, when in real life, the 19 hijackers, the '93 WTC, U.S. Embassy, U.S.S. Cole, and British subway bombers were hardly Christians. Hmmm . . . what religion were they? We don't recall Mohammed Taheri-Azar, saying on Friday in his post attempted-murder 911 call, that he tried to use his jeep to kill Americans in the name of Jesus. No, he mentioned someone else's name, another religion . . . which are both nowhere blasphemed in "V."

We've already mentioned the high-ranking Christian priest, who regularly rapes young girls procured for him through an "agency." Before the priesthood, he was an evil military officer at a hospital where politically dissident youth had experiments conducted on them for the government (complete with Abu Ghraib-style hoods).

Then, there's the government. It's run by a religious Christian zealot. But not just any Christian zealot.

No. Chancellor Sutler is the supreme evil Christian. In order to get elected, he and the Bill O'Reilly-esque character (remember, before he became a cable host, he was a pharmaceutical CEO and made billions) arranged for hundreds of Brits to die from chemically poisoned water. The government said that terrorists did it, a story which became accepted fact and the conventional wisdom in media coverage. The fear that ensued garnered Sutler the chance to rule England, along with the Marshal law powers the English parliament gave him.

It's no coincidence that the symbol used for his government is some sort of Cross-come-Swastika combo. Not offended yet?

Under religious Christian zealot Sutler, gays are rounded up, imprisoned, tortured, and executed. Ditto for any dissidents, any left-wing activists, anyone who dares speak out against or flout the Chancellor's actions. Tell that to the ACLU, which seems to be running legal policy in our country, these days, and its partner in crime, the Southern Poverty Law Center, the wealthiest "public interest" group in the U.S., to the tune of hundreds of millions. We don't see any prospect of them being rounded up by the government anytime soon, unfortunately.

Under the religious Christian Chancellor, "unjust" Gitmo-style military tribunals and absurd NSA-style wiretapping is going on at every corner. Throughout the movie, we are shown vans of law enforcement personnel listening in to every home. As if that's what NSA wiretapping was about. It isn't, but "V" drills it into you the way the ACLU wants you to see it: every conversation in every kitchen, etc., secretly being listened in on and laughed at by guys in sweaty, rumpled shirts and ties.

The evil government law enforcement chief, Creedy, runs a meticulously ubiquitous surveillance program nationwide. If only our FBI's Robert Mueller were so competent, we'd be safe. Instead, he's cavorting with extremist Muslims and testified in depositions to ignorance of the most basic newspaper facts about Al-Qaeda.

Overall, the most outrageous thing about "V" is the ending. Instead of vanquishing terror, all of Britain sides with the terrorist hero of this movie. They celebrate his murder of all the top officials in government, his blowing up of the Houses of Parliament and other government buildings.

Terrorists and terrorism are the heroes, the government fighting them and trying to keep us safe are the enemy.

This is the glorious revolution? Osama Bin Laden must be very proud.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: amerikka; beautifulmuslims; bushhitler; conservativefascists; dystopia; evilchristians; farleft; moonbats; moviereview; pc; politicalcorrectness; uk; vforvendetta
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-126 next last
Hollywood's moonbat view of the War On Terror, on Bush's America, on evil Christians and on those conservative fascists cracking down on beautiful Muslims. A movie only Osama Bin Laden could love. This is what the Far Left thinks of the future: terrorists good, America (with the futuristic dystopian UK as an allegorical stand-in for Bush's America) bad. Skip it.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

1 posted on 03/08/2006 7:18:05 AM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

I'm not sure why anyone is surprised- the graphic novel was written in the early 80's by a leftist who feared that Ronald Reagan would start a nuclear war and that Maggie Thatcher would turn England into a fascist dictatorship.

That being said, V for Vendetta is one of the best-written graphic novels I have ever read. I roll my eyes at is politics, but it's a heck of a story. If the movie adaptation is half as good, it is certainly worth watching, politics aside.


2 posted on 03/08/2006 7:23:06 AM PST by Potowmack ("Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Potowmack
In view of your comments, I'm not really surprised Hollywood made it. It fits their current view of America. To the Left, America IS the enemy.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

3 posted on 03/08/2006 7:25:35 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

This has Academy Award written all over it.

Defund Hollywood, if you must see or listen to their trash, download it.


4 posted on 03/08/2006 7:25:56 AM PST by BadAndy (I miss the days when people didn't celebrate their perversions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Here we go again into "Farenheit 9/11" mode...In the movie "The Devil's Advocate" Satan played by Al Pacino came to earth in the form of a lawyer...very appropriate...but he could have easily been a Hollywood Director/Producer...
5 posted on 03/08/2006 7:27:03 AM PST by frogjerk (LIBERALISM: The perpetual insulting of common sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Potowmack

I think it looks promising. If it's a good movie, I can tolerate blatant propaganda. One of my favorite movies is Alexander Nevsky (of course, the film isn't contemporary in impact, nor does it target my viewpoints).


6 posted on 03/08/2006 7:28:06 AM PST by Cyclopean Squid (History is a work in progress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
The fear that ensued garnered Sutler the chance to rule England, along with the Marshal law powers the English parliament gave him.

I think that should be martial law, Debbie.

7 posted on 03/08/2006 7:29:06 AM PST by The G Man (The Red States ... the world's only hope for survival.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BadAndy
And this phobia about Christians? Tsk. Christians are portrayed in our movies in a negative light while Islam is either whitewashed or ignored. The reality about the religions are exactly the reverse but you won't know it from watching "V: For Vendetta" or any of the other Hollywood movies in which Christians are presented as a perpetual menance to all that is great and free in America.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

8 posted on 03/08/2006 7:29:59 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

Speaking of "The Devil's Advocate", what did you think of it?

I enjoyed it immensely. I loved the scenes of dialogue between Pacino and Keanu Reeves.


9 posted on 03/08/2006 7:30:49 AM PST by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
In view of your comments, I'm not really surprised Hollywood made it. It fits their current view of America. To the Left, America IS the enemy.

The funny thing is, in the graphic novel the US wasn't even mentioned. There was a vague reference to a nuclear war, but all of the settings and all of the characters were British.

10 posted on 03/08/2006 7:30:59 AM PST by Potowmack ("Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Potowmack
If the movie adaptation is half as good, it is certainly worth watching, politics aside.

Sure why not?

Give the producers your money so they can more of this crap

After all its only a movie, movies don't have ANY culturally influence do they?

11 posted on 03/08/2006 7:31:58 AM PST by apackof2 (You can stand me up at the gates of hell, I'll stand my ground and I won't back down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cyclopean Squid
The only people the Left lives in abject terror of are conservatives. I'm so pleased I'm thinking of getting a Guy Fawkes mask to scare the living daylights out of the moonbats!

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

12 posted on 03/08/2006 7:32:03 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Potowmack

Was 1984 a left-wing screed too?

The total-surveillance state that Orwell predicted is coming about only a couple of decades behind schedule in England. Guns and any other means of self-defense is banned, cars are tracked by satellite, and cameras blanket the streets.

George Washington observed that "government is not reason, it is not eloquence, it is force; like fire, a troublesome servant and a fearful master."

We as patriotic Americans should not be allowed to be stampeded into enslaving ourselves to government for the sake of the illusion of "keeping us safe."


13 posted on 03/08/2006 7:32:13 AM PST by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: apackof2

Give the producers your money so they can MAKE more of this crap


14 posted on 03/08/2006 7:32:57 AM PST by apackof2 (You can stand me up at the gates of hell, I'll stand my ground and I won't back down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cyclopean Squid
I think it looks promising. If it's a good movie, I can tolerate blatant propaganda.

Agreed. My complaint with Fahrenheit 9/11 wasn't that it was blatant propaganda. It just wasn't a very good movie (I hesitate to use the term 'documentary').

'Reds' is a movie worth watching, for example.

15 posted on 03/08/2006 7:32:59 AM PST by Potowmack ("Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve
Speaking of "The Devil's Advocate", what did you think of it?

Compared to some of the partners from large NY law firms I've met during my practice, Pacino's character was a fuzzy bunny.

16 posted on 03/08/2006 7:34:14 AM PST by Potowmack ("Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Someone needs to tell this "reviewer" that it's based on a comic book. a pretty decent one actually. The movie probably won't be any good, however.


17 posted on 03/08/2006 7:34:42 AM PST by neutrality
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Potowmack
That's true but they needed a way to blame America so what the next best thing to do than to blame our ally? Tony Blair is a good whipping boy for the Left's screwed-up mindset in which the Anglosphere's actions against Islamic Terror is making the entire planet go to pot. For the life of me, I can't figure out what the hell is wrong with those people. Its like they live in a parallel universe.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

18 posted on 03/08/2006 7:35:15 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: neutrality

Oh, and it was published in 1982


19 posted on 03/08/2006 7:35:24 AM PST by neutrality
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
BWHAHAHA!!! It didn't take long did it? I expect more 'conservatives' to come out against this Hollywood 'garbage' as the release date gets closer. It's all about Bush and Republicans, it has to be!!

Unfortunately the work this movie is based upon was released as a comic book in Great Britain in the early 1980s. The author even addresses the concerns, 20 years ago, of surveillance equipment (cameras) on the streets of London. And what do we have in some cities overseas today? And what do cities here in the US advocate? It doesn't have a damn thing to do specifically with Bush. What it does have to do with is an intrusive government that takes away the freedoms of the citizens in order to protect them.

Conservatives shouldn't have any problem with this movie. Republicans in their partisan beliefs may though

20 posted on 03/08/2006 7:36:22 AM PST by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-126 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson