Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran has enough uranium gas to produce 10 bombs - IAEA
AFP via Babelfish translation | March 8, 2006

Posted on 03/08/2006 2:45:39 AM PST by HAL9000

ALARM - Iran has enough uranium gas to produce 10 bombs

VIENNA - the United States estimates that Iran has enough uranium gas to manufacture after enrichment ten nuclear bombs, and they claim new inspections, indicated a diplomat at the IAEA Wednesday to AFP.



TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ahmadinejad; byebyeiran; elbaradeiisthebest; elbaradeilovesallah; elbaradeionthejob; habituallinkomitter; iaea; iran; irannukes; missinglink; mushroomcloud; nuclearweapons
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last

1 posted on 03/08/2006 2:45:41 AM PST by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Agence France-Presse -

US says Iran has enough uranium gas to make 10 nuclear weapons

The United States has alleged that Iran has enough uranium gas to make 10 nuclear weapons and has called for new inspections in the Islamic Republic, a diplomat in Vienna told AFP Wednesday.

A senior US official made the allegations at a closed-door meeting in Vienna of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the United Nations' nuclear watchdog, the diplomat said.


2 posted on 03/08/2006 2:47:43 AM PST by HAL9000 (Get a Mac - The Ultimate FReeping Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000; All
In other news:

Shahab 6

The Shahab-6 is expected to have a range of 5,470-5,500 and 5,632-6,200 kilometers with a 1,000-750-500 kilogram warhead. This range capability will depend on the number of stages used in the launch vehicle and their performance. December 1996 news reports claimed that Iran is developing a 3,500-mile (5,632 kilometers) range missile called Shahab-6 that would be capable of reaching Europe.
 

Tehran to...

Paris: 2624 miles (4223 km) (2280 nautical miles)

London: 2739 miles (4408 km) (2380 nautical miles)

Moscow: 1529 miles (2461 km) (1329 nautical miles)

Beijing: 3482 miles (5603 km) (3026 nautical miles)

Tokyo: 4766 miles (7671 km) (4142 nautical miles)

Mason City, Iowa: 6565 miles (10565 km) (5705 nautical miles)

Sydney: 8019 miles (12905 km) (6968 nautical miles)

Jerusalem: 974 miles (1568 km) (847 nautical miles)

Tel Aviv: 988miles (1590 km) (858 nautical miles)

Honolulu, Hawaii 8064 miles (12979 km) (7008 nautical miles)


3 posted on 03/08/2006 2:52:59 AM PST by backhoe (-30-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

The thread title should say 'US' instead of 'IAEA'


4 posted on 03/08/2006 2:54:19 AM PST by HAL9000 (Get a Mac - The Ultimate FReeping Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

Are the Euroweenies worried yet? How about George Clooney and Cindy Chavez? All Iran needs to do is set off one nuke with considerable human carnage. They'll then have the bona fides that they'll kill anyone who looks at them cross-eyed -- at which point, they'll move on to oil blackmail and handing out nukes to any towel-headed terrorist who comes knocking, and it's Armageddon.


5 posted on 03/08/2006 3:03:31 AM PST by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

How quickly will those theoretical elites get average Joe and Jane to demand something be done, because they are so tired of hearing about Iran??


6 posted on 03/08/2006 3:24:23 AM PST by Quanah Parker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hershey
" Are the Euroweenies worried yet? "

They won't allow themselves to believe it, until it unfortunately, literally FLASHES before their eyes.

They are incapable of believing their feel good approach of appeasement ( read Cowardice) will fail

7 posted on 03/08/2006 3:29:29 AM PST by Kakaze (I'm now a single issue voter.....exterminate Al Quaida)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: backhoe

Mason City? Hmmm, do you think it's a prime target?


8 posted on 03/08/2006 3:34:54 AM PST by elhombrelibre (Sexual inadequacy leads to liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre
Mason City? Hmmm, do you think it's a prime target?

Only if they can extend the range of the last warhead dispensed... glide bomb, anyone?

Seriously, I copied that handy list from Little Green Footballs, and I kind of doubt Honolulu has much to worry about either- but if I were in Europe, I'd be getting a bit jittery, now.

9 posted on 03/08/2006 3:39:51 AM PST by backhoe (-30-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
after enrichment

Ah, but there lies the rub.

I have a swimming pool with enough heavy water for a small nuclear reactor - but it is still mixed with regular water.
10 posted on 03/08/2006 3:43:16 AM PST by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - IT'S ISLAM, STUPID! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backhoe

I'm sure the point is that the US isn't immediately threatened, like the other countries and cities shown are.
Even China might want to think again the idea or a nuclear Iran.


11 posted on 03/08/2006 3:46:14 AM PST by elhombrelibre (Sexual inadequacy leads to liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Well, this can't be. According to the NY Slimes, March 5:

". . .interviews with many of the world's leading nuclear analysts and a review of technical assessments show that Iran continues to wrestle with serious problems that have slowed its nuclear ambitions for more than two decades."

"Obstacles, the experts say, remain at every step. . .the most significant, they say, involve the two most technically challenging aspects of the process -- converting uranium ore to a toxic gas and, especially, spinning that gas into enriched atomic fuel.  According to the analysts, the Iranians need to do repairs and build new machines at a prototype plant before they can begin enriching even modest quantities of uranium. . ."

Now, whom may those "experts" and "analysts" quoted by the Gray Lady be?

"American intelligence agencies say it will take five to 10 years for Iran to manufacture the fuel for its first atomic bomb."

Ah, but Langley typically covers its rear end:

"Most forecasters acknowledge that secret Iranian advances or black market purchases could produce a technological surprise."

And whose responsibility is it to ferret out those "secret Iranian advances?"  Why, the same people who are downplaying the Iranian threat.  Cool.

Go back to sleep, America -- the Slimes and Langley have it all under control.

12 posted on 03/08/2006 3:49:06 AM PST by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre
Even China might want to think again the idea or a nuclear Iran.

Yes... let me see if I can find a map... it's a poor one, for older missiles, but gives an idea of the area, and number of countries under the gun:



13 posted on 03/08/2006 3:51:17 AM PST by backhoe (-30-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide

Anyone know what the intelligence is on the number of operational centrifuges the Iranians have?

Having enough uranium hexaflouride to make 10 bombs doesn't mean anything if you can't do the next steps - enriching the uranium - separating the U235 isotopes - and then making a bomb out of it.

But then, there is no point having that much uranium gas unless you are enriching it to nuclear power plant grade or weapons grade. And if the IAEA cannot inspect what they are doing with it, one has to assume they are enriching it to weapons grade.


14 posted on 03/08/2006 3:54:41 AM PST by JustDoItAlways
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
"... has enough uranium gas to manufacture after enrichment ten nuclear bombs..."

deceptive article title?

15 posted on 03/08/2006 3:57:26 AM PST by 1234 (Border Control or IMPEACHMENT NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backhoe

The map should be named "the kill zone."


16 posted on 03/08/2006 3:57:51 AM PST by elhombrelibre (Sexual inadequacy leads to liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre

Add another zone for fall-out.


17 posted on 03/08/2006 4:13:12 AM PST by S0122017 (My sister is a communist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
- but if I were in Europe, I'd be getting a bit jittery, now.

Wonder if Chirc already knew about this when he threaten to nuke anyone that tried to nuke France

Geez .. what a mess this is

18 posted on 03/08/2006 4:29:55 AM PST by Mo1 (Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists.. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Wonder if Chirc already knew about this when he threaten to nuke anyone that tried to nuke France Geez .. what a mess this is

That it is. France has always been a wild card in the nuclear "club"-- military people I knew back in the Cold War told me the old USSR was scared to death the French would do something wacky, like blast them unilaterally.

In this situation, that might not be such a bad thing.

19 posted on 03/08/2006 4:35:22 AM PST by backhoe (-30-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

"Geez .. what a mess this is"

The main thing is, we keep talking about it, our government keeps talking about "dreadful consequences", iran keeps making bombs, iran's leader keeps discussing that the holocast was a fable, and keeps discussing wiping israel off the map. Sounds like now they have the means to do it. Anyway...have they solved that murder down in Aruba yet? I was sure that dutch boy did it. Oh! Who do you think is going to be in the Final Four? Man, I've got to go hit Sam's tonight. I heard there is a special on bulk pork rinds. :)


20 posted on 03/08/2006 4:40:19 AM PST by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson