Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What killed Dana Reeve?
THE AGE ^ | 03-08-2006 | THE AGE

Posted on 03/07/2006 10:12:12 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist

Did years of singing in smoky nightclubs kill Dana Reeve, the widow of paralysed Superman actor Christopher Reeve?

She died yesterday of lung cancer even though she was not a smoker.

"Ten to 15 per cent of people who develop lung cancer are thought to be non-smokers. It was said that she had, in the course of being an entertainer, spent a lot of time in pubs, in nightclubs, in which there is a lot of cigarette smoke," said Dr James Mulshine from Rush University Medical Centre in Chicago.

Reeve, 44, won worldwide admiration for her devotion to her husband through his decade of near total paralysis.

He died 15 months ago and late last year she appeared at a gala for the Christopher Reeve Foundation and appeared to be responding well to treatment.

In the US more women die of lung cancer than breast cancer, and one in five American women diagnosed with the disease have never lit a cigarette.

"We know that 90 per cent of lung cancer is linked to direct smoking, the other 10 per cent is tied to occupational exposures, radon and secondhand smoke," said Pat McKone, a senior director of tobacco control with the American Lung Association.

"Dana Reeve was not a smoker, but she did spend many years of her singing career in smoke filled nightclubs."

Her death comes amid a worldwide debate on the danger of passive smoking and attempts to ban smoking from bars, clubs and eateries.

For instance today in New Jersey a coalition of bars, restaurants and bowling alley operators sued the state claiming its ban on smoking law is unconstitutional.

Meanwhile tributes have poured in for Reeve who was best known for standing by her husband through his courageous decade-long battle with paralysis caused by a fall from a horse.

"The brightest light has gone out," said comedian Robin Williams, one of the couple's closest friends. "We will forever celebrate her loving spirit."

Reeve's death came as a shock because she seemed to have the upper hand on the deadly disease since telling the world about her diagnosis last year, only two days after the death of American ABC TV newsman Peter Jennings.

"I'm beating the odds and defying every statistic the doctors can throw at me," Reeve said just a few months ago.

Reeve said she had learned from her late husband's struggle.

"I was married to a man who never gave up," she said.

Her death sparked an outpouring from the Reeves' many friends and admirers in Hollywood and Washington, where she was a vocal backer of stem cell research.

Former president Bill Clinton and Senator Hillary Clinton described Reeve as "a model of tenacity and grace".

"Chris was America's superhero, and Dana became our hero, too," added former presidential candidate Senator John Kerry, a close family friend.

Dana Reeve is survived by her 13-year-old son Will and two adult stepchildren, Matthew and Alexandra.

Dana Reeve, who lived in Pound Ridge, New York, had appeared in Broadway and Off-Broadway productions and on the TV shows Law & Order, Oz and All My Children.

She married Reeve in 1992 and abandoned her acting career to care for him after he was paralysed when he fell from a horse in 1995.

Christopher Reeve died on October 10, 2004.

In his autobiography, Still Me, Reeve wrote that he suggested early on to his wife, "Maybe we should let me go."

She responded, "I'll be with you for the long haul, no matter what. You're still you and I love you."

Those were "the words that saved my life", he wrote.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: danareeve; denial; reeve; tobaccoaddicts
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-165 next last
To: alpo
...as it is heavier than air, like chlorine and carbon dioxide.

These both must be lighter than air. They get up where the ozone layer exists and cause Global Warming and deplete the ozone which causes skin cancer.

121 posted on 03/08/2006 9:22:30 AM PST by Dan(9698)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: metesky
My brother-in-law is the oncological pharmacist at a major hospital. He smokes and so do most of the doctors that he works with<

I don't think I know of one single doctor that smokes

122 posted on 03/08/2006 9:31:53 AM PST by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: paul51
Lucky you.

A few years ago, while I was remodeling the home of a local brain surgeon (for real), I was taken aback when the doc danndled his three month old son on his knee while smoking up a storm.

Maybe he had read the WHO report and knew that early exposure to SHS seems to build an immunity to asthma and other diseases later in life.

123 posted on 03/08/2006 9:37:27 AM PST by metesky ("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: metesky

nope, automatic transmissions is my game, LOL


124 posted on 03/08/2006 9:44:03 AM PST by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: metesky

Even though I disagreed with this woman on a number of issues, I will appreciate the fact that she stood by here husband through thick and thin. I admire her for that. As you state, her passing is not of great consequence. It is however unfortunate for their child(ren) to have lost both parents.

As for the topic on this thread, yes it has gone off target. I appreciate what you have said and don't disagree with much of it. Take care.


125 posted on 03/08/2006 11:02:47 AM PST by DoughtyOne (If you don't want to be lumped in with those who commit violence in your name, take steps to end it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Dick Vomer

And just how do you know their body isn't on fire hugh? LOL


126 posted on 03/08/2006 11:03:46 AM PST by DoughtyOne (If you don't want to be lumped in with those who commit violence in your name, take steps to end it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation
This is a good start: Epidemiology 101

Pretty straight forward. Not being snotty, I'm a wood butcher myself which is a lot less complicated than tranny work.

:O)

127 posted on 03/08/2006 2:18:19 PM PST by metesky ("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Dana Reeve, regardless of the lack of evidence or proof or ability to prove, her lung cancer was caused by second hand smoke, will become a cause-celeb for the anti-smoking nazi's.
128 posted on 03/08/2006 2:22:55 PM PST by TAdams8591 (Small is the key!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metesky

Dana's death will be be blamed on second hand smoke no matter what. The SHS is dangerous crowd, now have their poster child.


129 posted on 03/08/2006 2:25:14 PM PST by TAdams8591 (Small is the key!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Almost no smokers will say that smoking over time, doesn't cause diseases in SOME people which end in death.

Some of us object to the single minded hysteria regarding smoking, when there are other habits far more dangerous.

Second hand smoke studies, are however, bogus and have been proven so. They were conducted by anti-smokers to give them greater leverage to ban smoking. It's served them well.

130 posted on 03/08/2006 2:32:15 PM PST by TAdams8591 (Small is the key!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon
I'm surprised that liberals aren't saying that she could have grown new lungs with embryonic stem cells.

Just give 'em time. Then they'll all be saying "Bush killed Superman AND his wife!"

131 posted on 03/08/2006 2:34:29 PM PST by CFC__VRWC ("Anytime a liberal squeals in outrage, an angel gets its wings!" - gidget7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: N. Theknow
"People who use the death of someone to promote a cause, no matter how noble, are beneath contempt."

Wholeheartedly agreed. But that fact won't stop them.

132 posted on 03/08/2006 2:34:52 PM PST by TAdams8591 (Small is the key!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Final Authority
Then we have reasonable people, making reasonable observations, coming to the reasonable conclusion that one should not be forced to work and live in environments that are detrimental to ones health.

The problem with this statement is in your definition of "forced." No one is forced to work or live anywhere.

Unless, of course, you've been convicted of a felony. :-)

133 posted on 03/08/2006 2:35:31 PM PST by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: em2vn

Liberal rounding. Pun intended.


134 posted on 03/08/2006 2:37:00 PM PST by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

I admit it. I did it. I smoke, and I was 500 miles away, so, ipso facto, I did it. Sue me


135 posted on 03/08/2006 2:41:24 PM PST by Cyber Liberty (© 2006, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TAdams8591

Look, in a number of ways I agree with your comments. I'm not convinced some studies weren't rigged to show desired outcomes. I'm also fairly sure no studies seem to prove a cause and effect with second-hand smoke. Still, as you say, some people are and some people are not suseptible to problems from smoke. Is it irrefutable that second-hand smoke will not cause problems. I don't think so.

I've seen how bad it can get in a room with smokers. I'm glad that I don't have to face that. Is that an inconvenience for smokers. Yes it is.

Some of the new smoking plan ideas are just plain nuts as far as I am concerned, and if the powers that be continue to push, I'm going to join smokers against them. Enough is enough.


136 posted on 03/08/2006 2:53:41 PM PST by DoughtyOne (If you don't want to be lumped in with those who commit violence in your name, take steps to end it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
I don't believe second hand smoke causes life threatening disease like cancer and emphysema or even ANY disease.

I do think it can aggravate asthma, allergies or other such maladies. To most non-smokers SHS is an annoyance, albeit sometimes a very annoying annoyance. : ).

137 posted on 03/08/2006 2:58:58 PM PST by TAdams8591 (Small is the key!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Many smokers don't like being in smoke-filled rooms either. : )


138 posted on 03/08/2006 3:00:38 PM PST by TAdams8591 (Small is the key!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: metesky
My brother-in-law is the oncological pharmacist at a major hospital. He smokes and so do most of the doctors that he works with.

What hospital is this? lol

Please tell everyone, they need to stay clear of those medical geniuses!

139 posted on 03/08/2006 3:01:18 PM PST by SunnyUsa (No man really becomes a fool until he stops asking questions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
My only question is "why did Halliburton want her dead?"

LOL! :)

140 posted on 03/08/2006 3:01:26 PM PST by proud American in Canada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-165 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson