Skip to comments.
Ethanol Industry Sets Record in 2005
RenewableEnergyAccess.com ^
| March 6, 2006
| staff
Posted on 03/06/2006 11:00:00 AM PST by kellynla
Washington, DC [RenewableEnergyAccess.com] The Renewable Fuels Association (RFA) announced that the U.S. ethanol industry set annual production records in 2005, producing just less than 4 billion gallons (3.904 billion gallons) and averaging nearly 255,000 barrels of ethanol production daily, according to data released by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA).
"These figures represent not only the tremendous growth our industry is experiencing, but also the future growth that will occur," said RFA President Bob Dinneen.
"Demand for ethanol will only continue to grow as refiners remove MTBE from the marketplace and more Americans switch to this clean burning, renewable fuel," said Dinneen. "The U.S. ethanol industry, with 2.1 billion gallons of capacity currently under construction, will continue to expand to meet this soaring demand."
Currently, 95 ethanol plants have a combined production capacity of more than 4.3 billion gallons a year.
(Excerpt) Read more at renewableenergyaccess.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: 2005review; energy; ethanol
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-258 next last
"There are 34 ethanol plants and nine expansions under construction with a combined annual capacity of more than 2.1 billion gallons."
Whatever the cost, it's cheaper than the life of one Marine!
1
posted on
03/06/2006 11:00:03 AM PST
by
kellynla
To: kellynla
Whatever the cost, it's cheaper than the life of one Marine!
And it's only going to get cheaper.
2
posted on
03/06/2006 11:05:25 AM PST
by
cripplecreek
(Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
To: kellynla
Whatever the cost, it's cheaper than the life of one Marine! Unfortunately, they use more oil than they save.
3
posted on
03/06/2006 11:06:32 AM PST
by
Toddsterpatriot
(A.Pole "I escaped Communism, but think we need more of it in America. Because Communism works")
To: Toddsterpatriot
The use more "Energy" than they save.
4
posted on
03/06/2006 11:09:54 AM PST
by
Forrestfire
(("To educate a man in mind and not in morals is to educate a menace to society." Theodore Roosevelt))
To: Forrestfire
And the difference is..........
5
posted on
03/06/2006 11:11:37 AM PST
by
Toddsterpatriot
(A.Pole "I escaped Communism, but think we need more of it in America. Because Communism works")
To: Toddsterpatriot
"Unfortunately, they use more oil than they save."
yea right...LMAO
if you're gonna break wind, do it on somebody else's thread will ya...
World Bank estimates that Brazil produces ethanol for a buck a gallon...compared to the international cost of gasoline which is a buck and a half!
6
posted on
03/06/2006 11:14:44 AM PST
by
kellynla
(Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots. Semper Fi!)
To: kellynla
World Bank estimates that Brazil produces ethanol for a buck a gallon...compared to the international cost of gasoline which is a buck and a half! If only we could also grow sugar cane near the equator it might make sense. Maybe if we could import Brazil's cheap sugar or their cheap ethanol.
7
posted on
03/06/2006 11:18:09 AM PST
by
Toddsterpatriot
(A.Pole "I escaped Communism, but think we need more of it in America. Because Communism works")
To: Toddsterpatriot
"Unfortunately, they use more oil than they save."
That's not true. It was debunked a long time ago. Granted, its not a very efficient process, but its still in the plus column, not the negative in terms of energy production.
8
posted on
03/06/2006 11:18:36 AM PST
by
Pessimist
To: kellynla
Does anybody have a handle on how much farm tractor, truck, train fuel is expended to get a gallon of ethanol into someones gas tank?
To: Pessimist
It was debunked a long time ago. Source?
Granted, its not a very efficient process, but its still in the plus column, not the negative in terms of energy production.
I wonder if it'd be cheaper if we just fermented the $$$ instead of throwing it at the corn farmers?
10
posted on
03/06/2006 11:20:04 AM PST
by
Toddsterpatriot
(A.Pole "I escaped Communism, but think we need more of it in America. Because Communism works")
To: Toddsterpatriot
The energy used to produce it can come from many sources ie solar, wind, natural gas or hydro. In any case it requires more energy (btu's) to produce than it yields. Not arguing your point, just the source of energy.
11
posted on
03/06/2006 11:21:07 AM PST
by
Forrestfire
(("To educate a man in mind and not in morals is to educate a menace to society." Theodore Roosevelt))
To: Forrestfire
Gotcha. Yes, much of the ethanol waste is of natural gas to produce fertilizer. Of course if we build more nuke plants we can use them to make H2 directly.
12
posted on
03/06/2006 11:24:17 AM PST
by
Toddsterpatriot
(A.Pole "I escaped Communism, but think we need more of it in America. Because Communism works")
To: kellynla
Ethanol Industry Sets Record in 2005Of course it has. It has bought off more politicians than ever in an effort to mandate the use of its product.
13
posted on
03/06/2006 11:25:48 AM PST
by
brewcrew
To: Toddsterpatriot
"Source?"
Do you actually read the articles & posts???
I already told you on post #6 that the World Bank estimates that Brazil produces ethanol for a buck a gallon!
Now either start reading the articles and the posts or go sober up elsewhere!
gezzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
14
posted on
03/06/2006 11:27:40 AM PST
by
kellynla
(Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots. Semper Fi!)
To: Toddsterpatriot
Do you have a source for this claim or does merely repeating it every chance you get make it so?
To: brewcrew
if you're not gonna believe any documentation then why bother to show up?
there is plenty of info out there on the success Brazil has had with ethanol production...
do your own research before you embarrass yourself on my threads any further!
16
posted on
03/06/2006 11:31:07 AM PST
by
kellynla
(Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots. Semper Fi!)
To: kellynla
Ethanol, more Alaska drilling (needed), Hybrids, more nuclear power, switch more things that are gas to electric (where possible), more bio diesel.... We will rapidly decrease our dependency on foreign oil. We import a lot less than is assumed and talked about in the MSM anyway, since most of those bogus stats don't take off shore drilling into account even if it's right off our boarder. We import roughly 1/3 of our oil but even that is to much.
17
posted on
03/06/2006 11:31:26 AM PST
by
Red6
To: kellynla
I already told you on post #6 that the World Bank estimates that Brazil produces ethanol for a buck a gallon! Great, we should buy their ethanol then. Sounds much cheaper than much less efficiently making our own.
18
posted on
03/06/2006 11:32:00 AM PST
by
Toddsterpatriot
(A.Pole "I escaped Communism, but think we need more of it in America. Because Communism works")
To: brainstem223
"Does anybody have a handle on how much farm tractor, truck, train fuel is expended to get a gallon of ethanol into someones gas tank?"
read post #6
Brazil produces ethanol for a buck a gallon.
And Brazil no longer IMPORTS ANY FOREIGN OIL!
19
posted on
03/06/2006 11:34:14 AM PST
by
kellynla
(Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots. Semper Fi!)
To: kellynla
Good. If America could just cut 10% of OPEC oil in the coming months it would have an impact on their terrorist supporting butts. It's only unfortunate that we will have to pay more because we can't supplement with ANWR.
20
posted on
03/06/2006 11:34:55 AM PST
by
Wasanother
(Terrorist come in many forms but all are RATS.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-258 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson