Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Junior May Have Learned in School Today
The Morning Paper | 03/02/06 | vanity

Posted on 03/02/2006 7:49:21 AM PST by genefromjersey

What Junior May Have Learned in School Today

Taped in a Denver – area classroom by a concerned student –the day after the State of the Union Address, this transcript details how a teacher named Jay Bennish instructed this class in World Geography at Overland HS.

Bennish: [tape begins with class already underway. Bennish completing an unintelligble statement about Venezuelan leader Hugo Chavez.] Why do we have troops in Colombia fighting in their civil war for over 30 years. Most Americans don't even know this. For over 30 years, America has had soldiers fighting in Colombia in a civil war. Why are we fumigating coca crops in Bolivia and Peru if we're not trying to control other parts of the world. Who buys cocaine? Not Bolivians. Not Peruvians. Americans! Ok. Why are we destroying the farmers' lives when we're the ones that consume that good.

Can you imagine? What is the world's number one single cause of death by a drug? What drug is responsible for the most deaths in the world? Cigarettes! Who is the world's largest producer of cigarettes and tobacco? The United States!

What part of our country grows all our tobacco? Anyone know what states in particular? Mostly what's called North Carolina. Alright. That's where all the cigarette capitals are. That's where a lot of them are located from. Now if we have the right to fly to Bolivia or Peru and drop chemical weapons on top of farmers' fields because we're afraid they might be growing coca and that could be turned into cocaine and sold to us, well then don't the Peruvians and the Iranians and the Chinese have the right to invade America and drop chemical weapons over North Carolina to destroy the tobacco plants that are killing millions and millions of people in their countries every year and causing them billions of dollars in health care costs?

Make sure you get these definitions down.

Capitalism: If you don't understand the economic system of capitalism, you don't understand the world in which we live. Ok. Economic system in which all or most of the means of production, etc., are owned privately and operated in a somewhat competitive environment for the purpose of producing PROFIT!

Of course, you can shorten these definitions down. Make sure you get the gist of it. Do you see how when, you know, when you're looking at this definition, where does it say anything about capitalism is an economic system that will provide everyone in the world with the basic needs that they need? Is that a part of this system? Do you see how this economic system is at odds with humanity? At odds with caring and compassion? It's at odds with human rights.

Anytime you have a system that is designed to procure profit, when profit is the bottom motive -- money -- that means money is going to become more important potentially than what? Safety, human lives, etc.

Why did we invade Iraq?! How do we know that the invasion of Iraq for weapons of mass destruction-- even if weapons had been found, how would you have known, how could you prove--that that was not a real reason for us to go there.

There are dozens upon dozens of countries that have weapons of mass destruction. Iraq is one of dozens. There are plenty of countries that are controlled by dictators, where people have no freedom, where they have weapons of mass destruction and they could be potentially threatening to America. We're not invading any of those countries!

[Pause.]

I'll give you guys another minute or two to get some of these [definitions] down. I agree with Joey. Try to condense these a little bit. I took these straight out of the dictionary.

Anyone in here watch any of Mr. Bush's [State of the Union] speech last night? I'm gonna talk a little about some of things he had to say.

...One of things that I'll bring up now, since some of you are still writing, is, you know, Condoleezza Rice said this the other day and George Bush reiterated it last night. And the implication was that the solution to the violence in the Middle East is democratization.

And the implication through his language was that democracies don't go to war. Democracies aren't violent. Democracies won't want weapons of mass destruction. This is called blind, naive faith in democracy!

Who is probably the single most violent nation on the face of planet Earth?!

Unidentified student interjects: We are.

The United States of America! And we're a democracy. Quote-unquote.

Who has the most weapons of mass destruction in the world? The United States.

Who's continuing to develop new weapons of mass destruction as we speak?! The United States.

So, why does Mr. Bush think that other countries that are democracies won't wanna be like us? Why does he think they'll just wanna be at peace with each other?

What makes him think that when the Palestinians get their own state that they won't wanna preemptively invade Israel to eliminate a potential threat to their security just like we supposedly did in Iraq?

Do you see the dangerous precedent that we have set by illegally invading another country and violating their sovereignty in the name of protecting us against a potential future--sorry--attack?

Why doesn't Mexico invade Guatemala? Maybe they're scared of being attacked. Ok. Why doesn't North Korea invade South Korea?! They might be afraid of being attacked. Or maybe Iran and North Korea and Saudi Arabia and what else did he add to the list last night - and Zimbabwe - maybe they're all gonna team up and try and invade us because they're afraid we might invade them. I mean, where does this cycle of violence end? You know?

(Sources of this report were the Rocky Mountain News and Michelle Malkin’s column.The teacher in question was suspended after a tape of his lecture surfaced on the Web and was seen by a school board member.)

I can’t help but wonder whether this is an isolated event, or whether such classroom political indoctrination attempts are commonplace.

Judging by some of what I’ve seen expressed on the Internet, I suspect Mr. Bennish has had a LOT of company over the years –probably to the great distress of the truly dedicated teachers who have to work with such people.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: academicbias; ideology; indoctrination; leftist; searchwillya; students
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: conservative physics
LOL, indoctrination works fine, just look at the Oprah audience, and the NYT bathhouse boy's editorial page.

Their power, along with their other allies in communication, ie, Hollywood, network "news", and academia, influence an enormous amount of the voting public.

Which is why conservatives and libertarians are rare in public office.

They are destroyed by a left-wing media that colludes with left-wing liberal and moderate candidates of both parties.
21 posted on 03/02/2006 9:49:25 AM PST by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone
"A loosing theory explained by a looser"

NO, it's a LOSING theory explained by a LOSER.

22 posted on 03/02/2006 10:17:23 AM PST by jackibutterfly (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: genefromjersey
Apparently they give teaching certificates to ignoramuses. Not only should this clown be fired for being too dumb to teach, but the teacher's college that certified him should be investigated.
23 posted on 03/02/2006 10:36:41 AM PST by The Great RJ ("Mir wölle bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wbill
The silence was deafening. Needless to say, I'm not all that popular with the wife's friends. I'm not losing much sleep over it....

We the unwashed are too simple minded to understand the theories of the intellectual elite.

Just damn!! ;0)

24 posted on 03/02/2006 10:53:52 AM PST by River_Wrangler (Nothing difficult is ever easy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: River_Wrangler
We the unwashed are too simple minded to understand the theories of the intellectual elite.

Absolutely. In fact, I'm not sure how I ever managed to articulate a cogent thought. Usually, I just grunt and point.

25 posted on 03/02/2006 1:15:10 PM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: genefromjersey
What Junior May Have Learned in School Today

I, for one, never knew that you could get cocaine from cocoa plants.

26 posted on 03/02/2006 1:37:00 PM PST by steve-b (A desire not to butt into other people's business is eighty percent of all human wisdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson