Posted on 03/01/2006 12:14:27 PM PST by Dane
Didn't see any live thread started to day for Hannity's show.
Hannity's "points" today. He agrees with Corzine's lawsuit, that got shot down today and also pushing the Israel angle, while he is silent that a official arm of the UK Govt. the Church of England synod, has also called for a boycott of Israel.
If I am not mistaken, the producer is his bro in law. Not likely there will be any criticism of the 'man'.
I'm just KIDDING ........ but.........
****
Hannity talks with:
Henry Kissinger...about Sean's book
William Bennett...about Sean's book
Venus Williams and Venus Flytrap...about Sean's book
The widow of Dr. Atkins and Chet Atkins...about Sean's book
Bush detractors...about Sean's book
Bush supporters...about Sean's book
Billy and Hilly Clinton ... about Sean's book. Some Shiek from goatville...about Sean's book
Schmuckie Schumer...about Sean's book
FR unknown FReeper wrote this.
****
Sean's on fire today. That is good. He may just be correct on this matter. It is way to complicated for me to be certain on the issue.
No matter how many times he resorts to calling people "Kool-Aid Drinkers", as he just did once again, Sean is still somewhat quite average.
You're right. 43 days. And I'll bet you, lots of leaks. Drip. Drip. Drip.
The arguments that we can't allow Dubai Ports World to manage some port terminals because UAE doesn't recognize Israel or because two terrible people were born there are equally unfair.
maybe todays talking points said to speak up against talking points? Rove is pretty clever ya know.
Sean mentioned that the UAE banks wired money to a hijacker to a bank here in Cincinnati. Uh oh, no more visiting my son in Cincinnati!!!!
Yes, he's a very nice guy and extremely respectful of people, but his analytical abilities leave a lot to be desired. If he gets caught off guard, he has a hard time thinking on his feet and you just shouldn't be in that kinda job if you're not quick-witted. Fortunately for the right, Alan is much slower.
I used to "have lunch" with Soupy! Wish he was still on TV.
Yes, but the point you're obviously trying to make is to infer some kind of equivalence between the anti-Israel sentiment in the two countries. That's just wrong. You don't need to stoop to that to try to defend the ports deal.
ex-friends? Hardly...it may suit your post but I suspect that it's pretty far from the truth.
Careful! You'll get a pie in the face!.........
Could be, I didn't catch Tony this morning.
I'm about to change my station, but I'll give it awhile longer. It's slim pickins at this hour of the day.
So I just jumped in.....he seems to be in a bad mood a lot these days...........
Dave is actually a money guy. He is very good, sound advise, and pretty funny! You can check him out at WTKG . That is the local station he is on right now.
Becki
Both General Tommy Franks and Colonel Oliver North insist that the UAE is a very strong allie of ours in the War on Terror...unlike Vannity, they won't turn their backs on real allies for ratings.
1. "UAE is anti-Israel"
As is every country in the Arab world, as is much of Africa, as is much of the European left, etc., etc. Have the UAE participated in any pogroms lately? If not, then they pass my smell test. Its not like they will have power to stop Israeli exports to the U.S.
2. DPL will "control the ports"
NO THEY WILL NOT! They will manage a terminal, just as COSCO (China) does at Long Beach and Hanjin does in Tacoma. Hey Sean, is there ANY terminal NOT managed by a foreign country? (crickets)
The ports will remain under control of their respective port authorities, ie organizations chartered by local U.S. governments. Let's also throw our brains out the window and deny the existence of the Coast Guard and U.S. Customs.
Oh, and now for some photos of the repressive theocracy that is Dubai. I went there last year. Oh the horror!:
I see you have been paid off by the UAE. (sic)
Just pointing out that the synod of the state religion of the UK is anti-Israel.
Why do wish to leave the UK off the hook.
If we were to round up every person suspected of being illegal......the jails would be full. Every person would be entitled to legal representation to be sure they were illegal. Their children would be where??????????
We would be caring for them in prison for endless periods of time.
The logistics of rounding up people and imprisoning them is so antithetical to our way of life.
There is no practical way, other than to get our borders more secure. To be sure that anyone caught committing a crime would be immediately deported and ceasing immediately this business of in state tuition and other amenities that many Americans cannot afford.
Rounding up millions of people is not going to happen.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.