Skip to comments.
Wall seen as ominous U.S. symbol (Miami Herald)
Miami Herald ^
| 02/26/2006
| HECTOR TOBAR
Posted on 02/27/2006 8:57:03 AM PST by devane617
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-123 next last
To: devane617
61
posted on
02/27/2006 9:47:30 AM PST
by
houeto
(Mr. President, close our borders now!)
To: Cvengr
To which side does the flag face? It appears that to many here in the U.S. they have forgotten what it looks like and what it stands for.
62
posted on
02/27/2006 9:55:35 AM PST
by
raybbr
(ANWR is a barren, frozen wasteland - like the mind of a democrat!)
To: HiJinx
The ominous symbol will hopefully become an ominous reality. Build the wall NOW!
63
posted on
02/27/2006 9:57:39 AM PST
by
afnamvet
(CONGRESS.SYS corrupted; Reformat WASH_DC (Y/N)?)
To: Jeremiah2911
64
posted on
02/27/2006 9:58:23 AM PST
by
raybbr
(ANWR is a barren, frozen wasteland - like the mind of a democrat!)
To: Boston Blackie
65
posted on
02/27/2006 10:03:09 AM PST
by
N3WBI3
(If SCO wants to go fishing they should buy a permit and find a lake like the rest of us..)
To: Psycho_Bunny
My, you have a way with letters.
Hyperbolic in front of M.F. is hysterical--thanks....
66
posted on
02/27/2006 10:05:04 AM PST
by
exit82
(Congressional Democrats---treasonously stuck on stupid.)
To: devane617
''It seems to us a real affront that a government that calls itself a friend and regional partner only wants our money and our products . . . treats our people as if they were a plague,'' Stein said. That's because the people (and I use the term very loosely) who come here illegally ARE a plague.
67
posted on
02/27/2006 10:05:54 AM PST
by
John O
(God Save America (Please))
To: devane617
These writing idiots ought to study history before they make historical comparisons to the Berlin Wall. Man, these people are ignorant! The Berlin Wall was basically a prison wall--trying to keep you from LEAVING Berlin!
To: conservative physics
I've often thought that's what we should do... but then we would have to give all the conquered mexicans welfare.
Screw that. We'll deport the residents of the territory we conquer. I've long said that there's no reason we should have to use our land to build a border fence.
69
posted on
02/27/2006 10:09:20 AM PST
by
furquhart
(Time for a New Crusade - Deus lo Volt!)
To: raybbr
Yikes! So illegals get a nice, comfy (re: Autobahn) ride before they cross over.
To: devane617
The president of Mexico's National Commission for Human Rights, Jose Luis Soberanes, called the proposal an act of ``idiocy.'' You don't suppose there's some shame in the background of all this, that so many latinos would rather be here than in their own countries? That millions feel driven to come here for jobs and medical care?
Naw.
71
posted on
02/27/2006 10:11:28 AM PST
by
Max in Utah
(At least we had it, at one time.)
To: devane617
The president of Mexico's National Commission for Human Rights, Jose Luis Soberanes, called the proposal an act of ``idiocy.''
No, you moron - the idiocy is allowing millions upon millions of illegal aliens into your country in what amounts to a defacto invasion.
72
posted on
02/27/2006 10:11:56 AM PST
by
reagan_fanatic
(Darwinism is a belief in the meaninglessness of existence - R. Kirk)
To: shuckmaster
Why invade? Offer jobs, welfare and Medicare and a majority would be willing to be annexed. But why stop at the Guatemalan border? Let's get that canal we built back.
73
posted on
02/27/2006 10:13:42 AM PST
by
BJClinton
(I'm on my 7th pot of coffee in 36 hours.)
To: devane617; All
To: devane617
..... ominous new symbol of America's unchecked power.
75
posted on
02/27/2006 10:16:27 AM PST
by
Ron H.
(Tancredo has been Right all along on securing American borders!)
To: Jeremiah2911
Yikes! So illegals get a nice, comfy (re: Autobahn) ride before they cross over.Illegals? You mean "new Americans" don't you?
We are now one of the largest Spanish-speaking nations in the world. We're a major source of Latin music, journalism and culture.
Just go to Miami, or San Antonio, Los Angeles, Chicago or West New York, New Jersey ... and close your eyes and listen. You could just as easily be in Santo Domingo or Santiago, or San Miguel de Allende.
For years our nation has debated this change -- some have praised it and others have resented it. By nominating me, my party has made a choice to welcome the new America.
As I speak, we are celebrating the success of democracy in Mexico. George Bush from a campaign speech in Miami, August 2000. |
You can read the speech here.
Here is an excerpt of a good critique of that speech:
In equating our intimate historic bonds to our mother country and to Canada with our ties to Mexico, W. shows a staggering ignorance of the civilizational facts of life. The reason we are so close to Britain and Canada is that we share with them a common historical culture, language, literature, and legal system, as well as similar standards of behavior, expectations of public officials, and so on. My Bush Epiphany By Lawrence Auster
76
posted on
02/27/2006 10:16:29 AM PST
by
raybbr
(ANWR is a barren, frozen wasteland - like the mind of a democrat!)
To: devane617
''The wall'' does not yet exist, and it might never be built, but already its 700 miles of fencing and electric sensors loom like a new Berlin Wall in the Latin American imagination.
Hey Hector The Berlin wall was built to keep people in. The proposed Mexican border wall is intended to keep people out.
Big difference.
77
posted on
02/27/2006 10:16:43 AM PST
by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
To: raybbr
2 lane 2-lift, 4" asphalt over 12" scarified and 8" aggregate base highway on unimproved real estate runs about $1 million in 2000 without land acquisition cost. Today that might be $2 million. Tack on another million for bureacracy and a million for real estate and the $31 mil still reads at about an order of magnitude greater than actual cost.
78
posted on
02/27/2006 10:17:02 AM PST
by
Cvengr
(<;^))
To: Cvengr
2 lane 2-lift, 4" asphalt over 12" scarified and 8" aggregate base highway on unimproved real estate runs about $1 million in 2000 without land acquisition cost. Today that might be $2 million. Tack on another million for bureacracy and a million for real estate and the $31 mil still reads at about an order of magnitude greater than actual cost.It's a lot bigger than that. Five lanes each way and three rail lines in the middle. However, it seems a bit ridiculous unless they plan to close our ports and ship every single container to the U.S. via mexico.
The article doesn't make it clear who will pay for it. It is clear that Americans will lose jobs due to it.
79
posted on
02/27/2006 10:20:50 AM PST
by
raybbr
(ANWR is a barren, frozen wasteland - like the mind of a democrat!)
To: devane617
''It seems to us a real affront that a government that calls itself a friend and regional partner only wants our money and our products . . . treats our people as if they were a plague,'' Stein said.You're absolutely right, we don't deserve you guys. Teach us a lesson by shunning us and not coming here.
80
posted on
02/27/2006 10:25:53 AM PST
by
John Jorsett
(scam never sleeps)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-123 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson