Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

22 ports in Arab deal, not just 6 as reported (From Maine to the Gulf)
World Net Daily ^ | 2-24-06 | Jerome R. Corsi, Ph.D.

Posted on 02/24/2006 2:37:07 PM PST by bildabare

Dubai Ports World is scheduled to take over operations at 22 U.S. ports, not six as previously reported by most major media.

According to the website of P&O Ports, the port-operations subsidiary of the London-based Peninsular & Oriental Steam Navigation Co. (P&O), DPW will pick up stevedore services at 12 East Coast

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: corsi; iamatroll; jeromecorsi; ports; swiftboatvets; uae; unfitforcommand
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-158 next last
To: Doe Eyes

LOL. The same dock workers will be there smartass. The only thing different will be the signature on their paychecks.

Dubai already operates terminals overseas that send shipments here. If they were smuggling a nuke, they could of done it A LOOOOONG TIME AGO.

Also.. The threat of a "Suitcase Nuke" has been HIGHLY overhyped by the media. It's very very likely that absolutely ZERO of these such things exist.


61 posted on 02/24/2006 4:31:35 PM PST by Stoooopendous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
UAE companies have been operating facilities at our ports for at least 16 years now.

Thank you for your reply. Like I said, it takes a lot of investigation to get to the bottom of all this and that's one thing I find disturbing.

Another thing I worry about--how solid is the UAE's support? Could their alliance shift?

I guess I remain worried but am open (and would be glad) to see that my concerns are unfounded.

62 posted on 02/24/2006 4:39:06 PM PST by proud American in Canada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
UAE companies have been operating facilities at our ports for at least 16 years now.

Which companies, which ports?

63 posted on 02/24/2006 5:03:03 PM PST by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: proud American in Canada

One of the side effects of globalism is that it makes war less likely. When you're heavily invested in another country, you're going to do everything you can do ensure cooperation, stability, and peaceful resolutions to potential conflicts.

For example, China is not going to nuke our west coast. They might as well as nuke their own coast, because the effect would be the same. We frankly have more to fear from Russia since neither of the two countries have extensive economic ties with the other.

We have no encomic ties with Iran or North Korea. We had none with Iraq.

You won't bomb your customer. You might bomb your supplier if you think you can take over, but not your customer. The USA is the world's biggest customer and it took something like al-Qaida, which has no business ties to the US, to attack us. The UAE won't. They'd be cutting off their own nose.

Having them operating in our ports probably ensures that they will remain friendly indefinitely.


64 posted on 02/24/2006 5:04:15 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Stoooopendous
Also.. The threat of a "Suitcase Nuke" has been HIGHLY overhyped by the media. It's very very likely that absolutely ZERO of these such things exist.

Do you realize you can smuggle really big nukes in a container ship?

65 posted on 02/24/2006 5:05:47 PM PST by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes
UAE-based firms have operated in Houston for years and their presence hasn't raised any misgivings about port security

66 posted on 02/24/2006 5:06:58 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes

You do realize that trying to smuggled a nuke in in a cargo container would be very dumb...it would be quickly detected.


67 posted on 02/24/2006 5:10:48 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Its not like they're running port operations. For all I can tell from the article, they operate the local convenience store.
68 posted on 02/24/2006 5:13:26 PM PST by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: tomahawk

"They are knee deep in supporting terrorist groups."

They are indeed. If it weren't so pathetic it would be humorous watching all the so-called conservatives on this site falling all over themselves trying to rationalize how this is a good thing.


69 posted on 02/24/2006 5:15:13 PM PST by be-baw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes
Yep, you're right. Sounds like they run the QuickieMart:

"Inchcape Shipping Services is a global organization that works with over 2,000 owners and charterers through our network of 200 offices in 53 countries around the world providing them ... services to help improve the commercial performance of their voyage or trade," according to a statement by its London office.

70 posted on 02/24/2006 5:20:11 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: bildabare

What part of "COME CLEAN" does the administration not understand????? The real American People are fed up with all this.


71 posted on 02/24/2006 5:21:42 PM PST by winker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
You do realize that trying to smuggled a nuke in in a cargo container would be very dumb...it would be quickly detected.

Unless, of course, those who operated the ports had been bought off or shared the destructive ideology of the bombers...

Which is kinda the point of this whole thing.

72 posted on 02/24/2006 5:23:03 PM PST by EternalVigilance (www.usbordersecurity.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
That statement says nothing about what Inchcape Shipping Services does in Houston.
73 posted on 02/24/2006 5:24:15 PM PST by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
"Unless, of course, those who operated the ports had been bought off or shared the destructive ideology of the bombers..."

Since you don't know the technology involved in radiological detection, and you're not going to either, or the people involved in those operations...that's a pretty lame comment to make.

I'll just add it to your tally.

74 posted on 02/24/2006 5:25:00 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

It would all depend on where your wonderful radiological detection equipment was deployed, wouldn't it...

Nice to have those nursed on Wahabbism privy to such deployments, eh?


75 posted on 02/24/2006 5:28:26 PM PST by EternalVigilance (www.usbordersecurity.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

As I said, you have no clue about those operations...just like port operations in general.


76 posted on 02/24/2006 5:32:33 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

So, we should just take the word of our betters, eh?


77 posted on 02/24/2006 5:36:10 PM PST by EternalVigilance (www.usbordersecurity.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
No, you should continue to march in lockstep with your brethren.
78 posted on 02/24/2006 5:38:43 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

As you march lockstep with whatever the administration position might be.

If they changed tomorrow, you'd change right along with 'em.


79 posted on 02/24/2006 5:41:13 PM PST by EternalVigilance (www.usbordersecurity.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

At least try to take some of the word of those who are experts in the field.


80 posted on 02/24/2006 5:41:15 PM PST by maica (We are fighting the War for the Free World. Democrats and the media are not on our side.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-158 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson